Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians. / Stelter, Marleen; Essien, Iniobong; Rohmann, Anette et al.
In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 232, 103820, 01.02.2023.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Stelter M, Essien I, Rohmann A, Degner J, Kemme S. Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians. Acta Psychologica. 2023 Feb 1;232:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103820

Bibtex

@article{29a73b8986164af6a93746a44e79631a,
title = "Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians",
abstract = "The present research assesses potential correlates of discriminatory police behavior, comparing police and civilian participants in a first person shooter task (FPST) as well as on various self-report measures of intergroup contact, intergroup attitudes, and ideological beliefs in three preregistered studies. Study 1 (N = 330), using a FPST with a short response window (630 ms), did not observe shooter biases in reaction times, error rates and signal detection parameters in neither police nor civilian participants. Study 2a (N = 290), using a longer response window (850 ms), observed a shooter bias in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in both civilian and police participants. These shooter biases were largely driven by faster reactions, fewer errors, and more liberal shoot decisions for armed Arab (vs. White) targets. Study 2b (N = 191; 850 ms response window) closely replicated shooter biases in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in a sample of civilian online participants. Across studies, we observed similar results in the shooter task for police and civilian samples. Furthermore, both police and civilian participants expressed anti-Muslim and anti-Arab attitudes across a variety of self-report measures. However, compared to civilians, police participants reported higher levels of anti-Muslim attitudes on some measures as well as higher levels of social dominance orientation, which might pose additional risk factors for discriminatory behavior. Lastly, while we observed reliable individual differences in self-reported intergroup attitudes, ideologies, and intergroup contact, none of these characteristics correlated with shooter biases.",
keywords = "Social Work and Social Pedagogics, Psychology, Police officer's dilemma, First-person shooter task, Shooter bias, Threat stereotypes, Anti-muslim prejudice",
author = "Marleen Stelter and Iniobong Essien and Anette Rohmann and Juliane Degner and Stefanie Kemme",
note = "This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University L{\"u}neburg. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103820",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians

AU - Stelter, Marleen

AU - Essien, Iniobong

AU - Rohmann, Anette

AU - Degner, Juliane

AU - Kemme, Stefanie

N1 - This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2023/2/1

Y1 - 2023/2/1

N2 - The present research assesses potential correlates of discriminatory police behavior, comparing police and civilian participants in a first person shooter task (FPST) as well as on various self-report measures of intergroup contact, intergroup attitudes, and ideological beliefs in three preregistered studies. Study 1 (N = 330), using a FPST with a short response window (630 ms), did not observe shooter biases in reaction times, error rates and signal detection parameters in neither police nor civilian participants. Study 2a (N = 290), using a longer response window (850 ms), observed a shooter bias in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in both civilian and police participants. These shooter biases were largely driven by faster reactions, fewer errors, and more liberal shoot decisions for armed Arab (vs. White) targets. Study 2b (N = 191; 850 ms response window) closely replicated shooter biases in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in a sample of civilian online participants. Across studies, we observed similar results in the shooter task for police and civilian samples. Furthermore, both police and civilian participants expressed anti-Muslim and anti-Arab attitudes across a variety of self-report measures. However, compared to civilians, police participants reported higher levels of anti-Muslim attitudes on some measures as well as higher levels of social dominance orientation, which might pose additional risk factors for discriminatory behavior. Lastly, while we observed reliable individual differences in self-reported intergroup attitudes, ideologies, and intergroup contact, none of these characteristics correlated with shooter biases.

AB - The present research assesses potential correlates of discriminatory police behavior, comparing police and civilian participants in a first person shooter task (FPST) as well as on various self-report measures of intergroup contact, intergroup attitudes, and ideological beliefs in three preregistered studies. Study 1 (N = 330), using a FPST with a short response window (630 ms), did not observe shooter biases in reaction times, error rates and signal detection parameters in neither police nor civilian participants. Study 2a (N = 290), using a longer response window (850 ms), observed a shooter bias in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in both civilian and police participants. These shooter biases were largely driven by faster reactions, fewer errors, and more liberal shoot decisions for armed Arab (vs. White) targets. Study 2b (N = 191; 850 ms response window) closely replicated shooter biases in reaction times, error rates, and response criterion in a sample of civilian online participants. Across studies, we observed similar results in the shooter task for police and civilian samples. Furthermore, both police and civilian participants expressed anti-Muslim and anti-Arab attitudes across a variety of self-report measures. However, compared to civilians, police participants reported higher levels of anti-Muslim attitudes on some measures as well as higher levels of social dominance orientation, which might pose additional risk factors for discriminatory behavior. Lastly, while we observed reliable individual differences in self-reported intergroup attitudes, ideologies, and intergroup contact, none of these characteristics correlated with shooter biases.

KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics

KW - Psychology

KW - Police officer's dilemma

KW - First-person shooter task

KW - Shooter bias

KW - Threat stereotypes

KW - Anti-muslim prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146234256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103820

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103820

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 36571894

VL - 232

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

M1 - 103820

ER -