Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. / Drazkiewicz, Anna; Challies, Ed; Newig, Jens.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 46, 01.07.2015, p. 211-222.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{45d5193be1db477abbbcb809c1da2135,
title = "Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany",
abstract = "Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of {\textquoteleft}what happened{\textquoteright}, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to {\textquoteleft}what would have happened{\textquoteright} under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, Conflict resolution, Environmental governance, Germany, Participation, Urban planning, Water resources planning",
author = "Anna Drazkiewicz and Ed Challies and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "211--222",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation and local environmental planning

T2 - Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

AU - Drazkiewicz, Anna

AU - Challies, Ed

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

AB - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Germany

KW - Participation

KW - Urban planning

KW - Water resources planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924235239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 46

SP - 211

EP - 222

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Institutionen für eine transformative Forschung
  2. Erklär mal!
  3. How school leadership and innovation shape instructional pathways to student achievement across nations
  4. Effects of training on employee suggestions and promotions
  5. Ammonia volatilization after application of biogas slurries in a coastal marsh region of Northern Germany
  6. Verspiegelt
  7. Teleological Judgment between Racism and its Critique
  8. Emanuel - verliebt in die Liebe
  9. Matheomnibus - Mathematik für alle
  10. Erläuterungen. Annotations.
  11. Bildungsreise in digitale Welten
  12. Lesen - Sozialisation - Geschlecht
  13. Exporte und Firmenerfolg
  14. Moralphilosophische Fragen zum "Embryo"
  15. Theorie und Praxis - Skypen macht´s möglich
  16. Der Frisörladen
  17. Spezielle Verfahren IV: Reaktionszeitmessung:
  18. Das transdisziplinäre Lehrforschungsprojekt “Leben 2014”
  19. Assessment of the Stability of the Ethanol Metabolite Ethyl Sulfate in Standardised Degradation Tests
  20. Work-Time Control and Exhaustion
  21. § 45 Reinhaltung von Küstengewässern
  22. Steuerliche Gewinnermittlung bei Unternehmen
  23. The research process of understanding biographical learning processes of sustainability entrepreneurs
  24. Leitpotential kritischer Gegenöffentlichkeiten.
  25. Über das Schreiben sprechen : Peer-Lernen in akademischen Schreibgruppen
  26. Die Kraft der digitalen Ästhetik
  27. Journal of Cleaner Production. Special Volume: The Integration of Corporate Sustainability Assessment, Management Accounting, Control, and Reporting
  28. Studium fundamentale an der Universität St. Gallen
  29. The intention to quit apprenticeships and the role of secondary jobs
  30. Das Subjekt und die Atmosphären, durch die es ist
  31. Der Zusammenhang von Schulleitungshandeln, Unterrichtsgestaltung und Lernerfolg
  32. Inspektionsbasierte Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung
  33. Foreword
  34. Short term effects of sensorimotor training on postural reflexes in parkinson's disease
  35. ‘Kollegah the Boss’
  36. Die Bohlsener Mühle
  37. Notting Hill Gate 4
  38. Theatralisierung des Alltags
  39. A Theoretical Introduction and Legal Perspective on Rule of Law Transfers