Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. / Drazkiewicz, Anna; Challies, Ed; Newig, Jens.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 46, 01.07.2015, p. 211-222.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{45d5193be1db477abbbcb809c1da2135,
title = "Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany",
abstract = "Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of {\textquoteleft}what happened{\textquoteright}, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to {\textquoteleft}what would have happened{\textquoteright} under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, Conflict resolution, Environmental governance, Germany, Participation, Urban planning, Water resources planning",
author = "Anna Drazkiewicz and Ed Challies and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "211--222",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation and local environmental planning

T2 - Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

AU - Drazkiewicz, Anna

AU - Challies, Ed

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

AB - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Germany

KW - Participation

KW - Urban planning

KW - Water resources planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924235239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 46

SP - 211

EP - 222

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. International sojourn experience and personality development
  2. IGLU - Ergebnisse im internationalen und nationalen Vergleich
  3. Vector Fields Autonomous Control for Assistive Mobile Robots
  4. Zur interaktion koordinativer und propriozeptiver leistungen
  5. Zur Auswirkung der Höranstrengung auf das Arbeitsgedächtnis
  6. Die Förderung selbständigen Lernens im Mathematikunterricht
  7. Foreign ownership and firm performance in the German services
  8. Adaptive Lehrerinterventionen beim mathematischen Modellieren
  9. The use of knowledge in inter-organisational knowledge-networks
  10. Transductive support vector machines for structured variables
  11. Linguistically Responsive Teaching in Multilingual Classrooms
  12. Exports, R&D and productivity in German business services firms
  13. Short run comovement, persistent shocks and the business cycle
  14. Multifractality of overlapping non-uniform self-similar measures
  15. Using haar wavelets for fault detection in technical processes
  16. Temporary exports and characteristics of destination countries
  17. Toward spatial fit in the governance of global commodity flows
  18. Simulation based comparison of safety-stock calculation methods
  19. The impact of soft-skills training for entrepreneurs in Jamaica
  20. Opportunities and Drawbacks of Mobile Flood Protection Systems
  21. Sustainability-Related Innovation and Sustainability Management
  22. Using Fuzzy PD Controllers for Soft Motions in a Car-like Robot
  23. Compound forging of hot-extruded steel-reinforced aluminum parts
  24. On inhomogeneous Bernoulli convolutions and random power series
  25. Improving Mathematical Modelling by Fostering Measurement Sense
  26. Die Dioxide und Trioxide des Tropilidens, Synthesen – Thermolysen.
  27. U-model-based dynamic inversion control for quadrotor UAV systems