Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. / Drazkiewicz, Anna; Challies, Ed; Newig, Jens.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 46, 01.07.2015, S. 211-222.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{45d5193be1db477abbbcb809c1da2135,
title = "Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany",
abstract = "Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of {\textquoteleft}what happened{\textquoteright}, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to {\textquoteleft}what would have happened{\textquoteright} under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, Conflict resolution, Environmental governance, Germany, Participation, Urban planning, Water resources planning",
author = "Anna Drazkiewicz and Ed Challies and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "211--222",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation and local environmental planning

T2 - Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

AU - Drazkiewicz, Anna

AU - Challies, Ed

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

AB - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Germany

KW - Participation

KW - Urban planning

KW - Water resources planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924235239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 46

SP - 211

EP - 222

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Marktorientierte Markenbewertung
  2. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds
  3. Germany's trade in goods
  4. Emotional Human-Machine Interaction
  5. 'Freiwurf Hamburg': Qualitative Evaluation of an Inclusive Sports Project
  6. Menschen im Gründungsprozess
  7. Wenn man immer was Böses tut, kann Gott auch nicht immer zugucken
  8. Integrative entrepreneurship research-bridging the gap between sociological and economic perspectives
  9. Comparative Children's Literature
  10. Der Landschaftsbegriff in der Geographie
  11. Fälligkeit der Forderung aus einer zur Abwendung der Sicherungsvollstreckung geleisteten Prozessbürgschaft - Anmerkung zu BGH, Urt. v. 11. November 2014 (XI ZR 265/13)
  12. Bindung und Bildung
  13. Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism
  14. Procedural aspects of investor-state dispute settlement
  15. In terms of desire: Mary Parker Follett und der Diskurs der Organisationstheorie
  16. Zwischen Lebensrisiken und Klagen
  17. Fast Food Rap
  18. Seuse, Heinrich (lat. Suso)
  19. Microeconomic Consequences of Exemptions from Value Added Taxation – The Case of Deutsche Post
  20. What is sustainability economics?
  21. Scenarios for the Implementation of EU Waste Legislation at National Level and their Consequences for Emissions from Municipal Waste Incineration
  22. Programme der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention im Setting Schule
  23. Views on antecedents and outcomes of post-retirement work in a German aerospace company
  24. Claimed Legitimacy: Appreciating the Diversity of Regional Organizations
  25. Scholtz, Christopher P.: Alltag mit künstlichen Lebewesen, Göttingen 2008
  26. Wie effektiv ist Sprachförderung?
  27. Personality measures in personnel selection
  28. Product-Service Systems as Enabler for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation
  29. 8. Workshop Umweltinformatik zwischen Nachhaltigkeit und Wandel (UINW 2020)
  30. International Survey of Principals Concerning Emotional and Mental Health and Well-Being.
  31. § 351 Unteilbarkeit des Rücktrittsrechts
  32. Das heterarchische Unternehmen
  33. Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19
  34. The Impact of R&D Activities on Exports of German Business Services Enterprises
  35. Selbsttätigkeit und Freiheit bei Johann Georg Walch
  36. Exportaktivitäten und Rendite in niedersächsischen Industrieunternehmen
  37. Swissness als Erfolgsfaktor
  38. Politikberatung in der Wissensgesellschaft
  39. Den Wandel begreifen
  40. A leverage points perspective on institutions for food security in a smallholder-dominated landscape in southwestern Ethiopia
  41. Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT)