Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Public participation and local environmental planning : Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. / Drazkiewicz, Anna; Challies, Ed; Newig, Jens.

in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 46, 01.07.2015, S. 211-222.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{45d5193be1db477abbbcb809c1da2135,
title = "Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany",
abstract = "Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of {\textquoteleft}what happened{\textquoteright}, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to {\textquoteleft}what would have happened{\textquoteright} under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to {\textquoteleft}success{\textquoteright} in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, Conflict resolution, Environmental governance, Germany, Participation, Urban planning, Water resources planning",
author = "Anna Drazkiewicz and Ed Challies and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "211--222",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation and local environmental planning

T2 - Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

AU - Drazkiewicz, Anna

AU - Challies, Ed

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

AB - Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to ‘success’ in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of ‘what happened’, and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to ‘what would have happened’ under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to ‘success’ in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Germany

KW - Participation

KW - Urban planning

KW - Water resources planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924235239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 46

SP - 211

EP - 222

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI