Participation in protected area governance: A systematic case survey of the evidence on ecological and social outcomes

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Protected areas are considered key to conserving ecosystems and safeguarding biodiversity worldwide. Local stakeholders’ involvement in decision-making in area-based conservation approaches may help to mitigate environmental inequalities and to improve social and ecological outcomes. However, sound and in-depth evidence on the relationship between participation and protected area outcomes is piecemeal. To synthesize the available knowledge, we provide evidence from a systematic literature review of 52 empirical case studies from the scientific literature examining the social and ecological outcomes of protected-area-related decision-making processes in which local stakeholders participated. In a first step, we defined factors that are linked to social and ecological protected area outcomes as success. Based on these factors, we then categorized success indicators which we quantitatively linked to features of participation. Our review provides evidence of the relationship between protected area successes and the following four features of participation: 1. Genuine devolution of power to the local level; 2. Involvement of diverse actors and multiple perspectives through fair and inclusive processes; 3. Long-term external support; 4. Devolution of rights. Even though the degree and form of participation require adjustment to specific local contexts, this overview of features provides sound evidence based on the relation between participatory decision-making and social and ecological effectiveness in protected areas. These insights can be used to design more effective participatory conservation interventions that meet both biodiversity conservation and human well-being.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117593
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume336
ISSN0301-4797
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.06.2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Marlene Mader

Publications

  1. How many Persistent Organic Pollutants should we expect?
  2. The strength of vertical linkages
  3. On the micro-structure of the German export boom
  4. “Normality” Revisited: Fieldwork and Family
  5. On the micro-structure of the German export boom
  6. Semi-polar root exudates in natural grassland communities
  7. Minimum return guarantees, investment caps, and investment flexibility
  8. The persistent decline in unionization in western and eastern Germany, 1980 - 2004
  9. Abiotic and biotic drivers of tree trait effects on soil microbial biomass and soil carbon concentration
  10. Analysis of ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurries by an empirical model
  11. Up, up and away: An update on the UK's latest plans for space activities
  12. § 394
  13. The influence of landscape change on multiple dimensions of human–nature connectedness
  14. Activities in retirement
  15. Akademisches Schreiben
  16. Organizational Restructuring as a Self-Reinforcing Process
  17. Egozentrierte Netzwerkanalysen
  18. Economies of scope in European railways
  19. Building a bridge between school and university
  20. Konsolidierung oder Emergenz?
  21. Patterns of entrepreneurial career development
  22. Primary source regions of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) measured in the Arctic
  23. (Inhibiting) Factors for (Un)Sustainable Behaviour in Relation to the Effects of Education for Sustainable Development
  24. Tackling the knowledge-action gap in sustainable consumption
  25. § 328
  26. Wolke 7
  27. Bank management of the net interest margin
  28. Introduction
  29. The pandemic as challenge for intercultural and interreligious relations
  30. (Re)Produktivität
  31. Inmitten der Extreme
  32. Meta-custom and the court