One Group's Pain is another Group's Pleasure: Examining Schadenfreude in Response to Failures of Football Teams during the World Cup 2018

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

One Group's Pain is another Group's Pleasure: Examining Schadenfreude in Response to Failures of Football Teams during the World Cup 2018. / Boecker, Lea.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 56, 101992, 01.09.2021.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8d0e4e83667d496f9e9363ce7718073b,
title = "One Group's Pain is another Group's Pleasure: Examining Schadenfreude in Response to Failures of Football Teams during the World Cup 2018",
abstract = "Objectives: The failures of sport teams evoke strong emotions in spectators ranging from empathetic to unempathetic. The present work investigates how naturally varying group membership of participants (their nationality), disliking, social rank attainment (via dominance or prestige), and deservingness predict schadenfreude (= pleasure in response to another's misfortune) and sympathy in a highly relevant real-life sport event. Design: I employed a quasi-experimental design and used the failure of the German national football team in the World Cup 2018 at group stage (Study 1) and the English team in the semifinals (Study 2) to investigate which variables (disliking, deservingness, dominance, and prestige) predict schadenfreude and mediate the effect of group membership (same versus different nationality as the failing team) on schadenfreude. Results: Between-group comparisons revealed that outgroup members expressed more schadenfreude and less sympathy than ingroup members. Furthermore, disliking, deservingness, and dominance, but not prestige positively predicted schadenfreude. The mediator disliking explained most of the differences in schadenfreude between ingroup and outgroup members in Study 1 (in which a relatively high-ranking team failed already at group stage) as well as in Study 2 (in which a relatively low-ranking team failed only in the semifinals, representing a rather mild failure). Conclusions: The studies document divergent affective reactions of individuals merely differing in their national group membership. Dominance perceptions seem to vary with observers{\textquoteright} group membership. I discuss the relative impact of each variable, the function of intergroup schadenfreude and practical implications.",
keywords = "Disliking, Emotions, Football, Group membership, Schadenfreude, Social rank attainment, Business psychology",
author = "Lea Boecker",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101992",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - One Group's Pain is another Group's Pleasure: Examining Schadenfreude in Response to Failures of Football Teams during the World Cup 2018

AU - Boecker, Lea

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2021/9/1

Y1 - 2021/9/1

N2 - Objectives: The failures of sport teams evoke strong emotions in spectators ranging from empathetic to unempathetic. The present work investigates how naturally varying group membership of participants (their nationality), disliking, social rank attainment (via dominance or prestige), and deservingness predict schadenfreude (= pleasure in response to another's misfortune) and sympathy in a highly relevant real-life sport event. Design: I employed a quasi-experimental design and used the failure of the German national football team in the World Cup 2018 at group stage (Study 1) and the English team in the semifinals (Study 2) to investigate which variables (disliking, deservingness, dominance, and prestige) predict schadenfreude and mediate the effect of group membership (same versus different nationality as the failing team) on schadenfreude. Results: Between-group comparisons revealed that outgroup members expressed more schadenfreude and less sympathy than ingroup members. Furthermore, disliking, deservingness, and dominance, but not prestige positively predicted schadenfreude. The mediator disliking explained most of the differences in schadenfreude between ingroup and outgroup members in Study 1 (in which a relatively high-ranking team failed already at group stage) as well as in Study 2 (in which a relatively low-ranking team failed only in the semifinals, representing a rather mild failure). Conclusions: The studies document divergent affective reactions of individuals merely differing in their national group membership. Dominance perceptions seem to vary with observers’ group membership. I discuss the relative impact of each variable, the function of intergroup schadenfreude and practical implications.

AB - Objectives: The failures of sport teams evoke strong emotions in spectators ranging from empathetic to unempathetic. The present work investigates how naturally varying group membership of participants (their nationality), disliking, social rank attainment (via dominance or prestige), and deservingness predict schadenfreude (= pleasure in response to another's misfortune) and sympathy in a highly relevant real-life sport event. Design: I employed a quasi-experimental design and used the failure of the German national football team in the World Cup 2018 at group stage (Study 1) and the English team in the semifinals (Study 2) to investigate which variables (disliking, deservingness, dominance, and prestige) predict schadenfreude and mediate the effect of group membership (same versus different nationality as the failing team) on schadenfreude. Results: Between-group comparisons revealed that outgroup members expressed more schadenfreude and less sympathy than ingroup members. Furthermore, disliking, deservingness, and dominance, but not prestige positively predicted schadenfreude. The mediator disliking explained most of the differences in schadenfreude between ingroup and outgroup members in Study 1 (in which a relatively high-ranking team failed already at group stage) as well as in Study 2 (in which a relatively low-ranking team failed only in the semifinals, representing a rather mild failure). Conclusions: The studies document divergent affective reactions of individuals merely differing in their national group membership. Dominance perceptions seem to vary with observers’ group membership. I discuss the relative impact of each variable, the function of intergroup schadenfreude and practical implications.

KW - Disliking

KW - Emotions

KW - Football

KW - Group membership

KW - Schadenfreude

KW - Social rank attainment

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111947637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101992

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101992

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 56

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

M1 - 101992

ER -