In a no-win situation: The employment–health dilemma
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.2023, p. 64-84.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - In a no-win situation
T2 - The employment–health dilemma
AU - Kößler, Franziska J.
AU - Wesche, Jenny S.
AU - Hoppe, Annekatrin
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Applied Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Work and organizational psychology (WOP) research has to date mostly focused on people privileged to have the choice between several attractive job options and less on people who are restricted in their job choice (e.g., due to their qualification or personal contingencies) and have to choose from fewer and often less-than-optimal jobs. Often, the jobs available to the latter are characterized by precarious employment and hazardous working conditions which can put them in the difficult situation of having to choose between a health-threatening job and possible unemployment. Building on interdisciplinary literature, we propose the employment–health dilemma (E-H dilemma) as a framework for analyzing this intrapersonal conflict of having to choose between employment (incurring health threats) and health (incurring economic threats) and discuss potential antecedents and consequences of the E-H dilemma at the societal, organizational, and individual level. We outline the implications of the E-H dilemma and make a case for examining the full spectrum of job choice situations in WOP research. In doing so, we demonstrate what WOP can gain by embracing a more inclusive and multidisciplinary approach: uncovering processes in their entirety (e.g., job choice decisions of all people) and strengthening the role and legitimacy of WOP in society.
AB - Work and organizational psychology (WOP) research has to date mostly focused on people privileged to have the choice between several attractive job options and less on people who are restricted in their job choice (e.g., due to their qualification or personal contingencies) and have to choose from fewer and often less-than-optimal jobs. Often, the jobs available to the latter are characterized by precarious employment and hazardous working conditions which can put them in the difficult situation of having to choose between a health-threatening job and possible unemployment. Building on interdisciplinary literature, we propose the employment–health dilemma (E-H dilemma) as a framework for analyzing this intrapersonal conflict of having to choose between employment (incurring health threats) and health (incurring economic threats) and discuss potential antecedents and consequences of the E-H dilemma at the societal, organizational, and individual level. We outline the implications of the E-H dilemma and make a case for examining the full spectrum of job choice situations in WOP research. In doing so, we demonstrate what WOP can gain by embracing a more inclusive and multidisciplinary approach: uncovering processes in their entirety (e.g., job choice decisions of all people) and strengthening the role and legitimacy of WOP in society.
KW - decision-making
KW - job choice
KW - occupational health psychology
KW - precarious employment
KW - social inequalities
KW - well-being
KW - work and organizational psychology
KW - workplace hazards
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129840599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/apps.12393
DO - 10.1111/apps.12393
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85129840599
VL - 72
SP - 64
EP - 84
JO - Applied Psychology
JF - Applied Psychology
SN - 0269-994X
IS - 1
ER -