Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. / Schoeneborn, Dennis; Vásquez, Consuelo; Cornelissen, Joep.
In: Human Relations , Vol. 69, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 915-944.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schoeneborn D, Vásquez C, Cornelissen J. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human Relations . 2016 Apr 1;69(4):915-944. doi: 10.1177/0018726715612899

Bibtex

@article{76ec2a4a83834aeabaae521811e9390e,
title = "Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox",
abstract = "Within organization studies, Morgan{\textquoteright}s seminal book Images of Organization has laid the groundwork for an entire research tradition of studying organizational phenomena through metaphorical lenses. Within Morgan{\textquoteright}s list of images, that of {\textquoteleft}organization as flux and transformation{\textquoteright} stands out in two important regards. First, it has a strong metonymic dimension, as it implies that organizations consist of and are constituted by processes. Second, the image invites scholars to comprehend organizations as a paradoxical relation between organization (an entity) and process (a non-entity). In this article, we build on Morgan{\textquoteright}s work and argue that flux-based images of organization vary in their ability to deal with the process-entity paradox, depending on the degree to which its metaphorical and metonymic dimensions are intertwined. We also examine three offsprings of the flux image: Organization as Becoming, Organization as Practice, and Organization as Communication. We compare these images regarding their metaphor–metonymy dynamics, the directionality of their process of imagination, and their degree of concreteness. We contribute to Morgan{\textquoteright}s work, and to organization studies more generally, by offering an analytical grid for unpacking different processes of imagining organization. Moreover, our grid helps explain why images of organization vary in their ability to comprehend organizations in dialectical and paradoxical ways.",
keywords = "flux image, metaphors, metonymies, organization theory, processes of imagination, process–entity paradox, Management studies",
author = "Dennis Schoeneborn and Consuelo V{\'a}squez and Joep Cornelissen",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726715612899",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "915--944",
journal = "Human Relations ",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy

T2 - Unpacking the process-entity paradox

AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

AU - Vásquez, Consuelo

AU - Cornelissen, Joep

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Within organization studies, Morgan’s seminal book Images of Organization has laid the groundwork for an entire research tradition of studying organizational phenomena through metaphorical lenses. Within Morgan’s list of images, that of ‘organization as flux and transformation’ stands out in two important regards. First, it has a strong metonymic dimension, as it implies that organizations consist of and are constituted by processes. Second, the image invites scholars to comprehend organizations as a paradoxical relation between organization (an entity) and process (a non-entity). In this article, we build on Morgan’s work and argue that flux-based images of organization vary in their ability to deal with the process-entity paradox, depending on the degree to which its metaphorical and metonymic dimensions are intertwined. We also examine three offsprings of the flux image: Organization as Becoming, Organization as Practice, and Organization as Communication. We compare these images regarding their metaphor–metonymy dynamics, the directionality of their process of imagination, and their degree of concreteness. We contribute to Morgan’s work, and to organization studies more generally, by offering an analytical grid for unpacking different processes of imagining organization. Moreover, our grid helps explain why images of organization vary in their ability to comprehend organizations in dialectical and paradoxical ways.

AB - Within organization studies, Morgan’s seminal book Images of Organization has laid the groundwork for an entire research tradition of studying organizational phenomena through metaphorical lenses. Within Morgan’s list of images, that of ‘organization as flux and transformation’ stands out in two important regards. First, it has a strong metonymic dimension, as it implies that organizations consist of and are constituted by processes. Second, the image invites scholars to comprehend organizations as a paradoxical relation between organization (an entity) and process (a non-entity). In this article, we build on Morgan’s work and argue that flux-based images of organization vary in their ability to deal with the process-entity paradox, depending on the degree to which its metaphorical and metonymic dimensions are intertwined. We also examine three offsprings of the flux image: Organization as Becoming, Organization as Practice, and Organization as Communication. We compare these images regarding their metaphor–metonymy dynamics, the directionality of their process of imagination, and their degree of concreteness. We contribute to Morgan’s work, and to organization studies more generally, by offering an analytical grid for unpacking different processes of imagining organization. Moreover, our grid helps explain why images of organization vary in their ability to comprehend organizations in dialectical and paradoxical ways.

KW - flux image

KW - metaphors

KW - metonymies

KW - organization theory

KW - processes of imagination

KW - process–entity paradox

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962640056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726715612899

DO - 10.1177/0018726715612899

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:84962640056

VL - 69

SP - 915

EP - 944

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Marleen Heid

Publications

  1. Erforschung multidiskursiver Organisationen
  2. Legitimation strategies of corporate elites in the field of labor regulation
  3. Healthy Principals - Healthy Schools?
  4. More Foxes in the Boardroom: Systems Thinking in Action
  5. When death is compelling
  6. Wenn der Golfstrom das Drehbuch schreibt
  7. Die Computerspielnutzung Heranwachsender aus Elternsicht unter dem Blickwinkel der Habitustheorie
  8. Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998)
  9. Sag mir, warum du studierst, und ich sag dir, was du studierst
  10. Action anticipation based on an agent's epistemic state in toddlers and adults
  11. Unfair wage perceptions and sleep: Evidence from German survey data
  12. Counting racism
  13. People incorrectly correcting other people: The pragmatics of (re-)corrections and their negotiation in a Facebook group
  14. A Note on Dual Internal Labor Markets and Wages of Temporary Workers
  15. How important is culture to understand political protest?
  16. Recht im Alltag mit Pierre Bourdieu
  17. Fazit und Ausblick
  18. Über die Wahrnehmung und Wirksamkeit des Feedbacks einer mathematikbezogenen Lernplattform
  19. Workshops als Möglichkeit zur Partizipation an der Weiterentwicklung von Studiengängen
  20. Sattelfest beim Sattelfest?
  21. Environmental impact of vehicular traffic in Nigeria
  22. Merkmal und Strukturen
  23. The impact of the 2004 EU enlargement on the performance of service enterprises in Germany's eastern border region
  24. Simulative Souveränität
  25. The Statute of the International Court of Justice
  26. Synthetic biology and biosecurity
  27. Plädoyer für eine bildungstheoretisch begründete nachhaltige Curriculumrevision
  28. Resonanz zwischen Systemtheorie und Kritischer Theorie