Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows. / Koellner, Thomas; Bonn, Aletta; Arnhold, Sebastian et al.
In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 105, 10.2019, p. 92-106.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Koellner, T, Bonn, A, Arnhold, S, Bagstad, KJ, Fridman, D, Guerra, CA, Kastner, T, Kissinger, M, Kleemann, J, Kuhlicke, C, Liu, J, López-Hoffman, L, Marques, A, Martín-López, B, Schulp, CJE, Wolff, S & Schröter, M 2019, 'Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows', Ecological Indicators, vol. 105, pp. 92-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046

APA

Koellner, T., Bonn, A., Arnhold, S., Bagstad, K. J., Fridman, D., Guerra, C. A., Kastner, T., Kissinger, M., Kleemann, J., Kuhlicke, C., Liu, J., López-Hoffman, L., Marques, A., Martín-López, B., Schulp, C. J. E., Wolff, S., & Schröter, M. (2019). Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows. Ecological Indicators, 105, 92-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046

Vancouver

Koellner T, Bonn A, Arnhold S, Bagstad KJ, Fridman D, Guerra CA et al. Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows. Ecological Indicators. 2019 Oct;105:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046

Bibtex

@article{bf4bef3490ee4246bd9195e90b79d309,
title = "Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows",
abstract = "Ecosystem services (ES) assessments commonly focus on a specific biophysical region or nation and take its geographic borders as the system boundary. Most geographical regions are, however, not closed systems but are open and telecoupled with other regions, such that the use of ES in one location is dependent on ecosystem processes and ecological management in other locations. Interregional ES flows often affect national economies and may trigger issues of national security and global equity. To date, however, methodologies for assessing interregional flows of ES have been published in dispersed literature. This paper provides a three-step guidance for how to assess four different types of interregional ES flows (traded goods, passive biophysical flows, species migration and dispersal as well as information flows). This guidance is intended to complement national and regional ecosystem assessments. The three steps are to (i) define the goal and scope of interregional ES flow assessments, (ii) quantify the interregional ES flows using a tiered approach and (iii) interpret results in terms of uncertainties, consequences and governance options. We compile different indicators for assessing interregional ES flows and evaluate their suitability for national and regional ES assessments. Finally, to assess the implications of interregional ES flows for environmental sustainability and human well-being, we relate our flow indicators to the Sustainable Development Goals. This guidance towards systematic assessment of interregional ES flows provides a first step to measure and quantify externalised environmental costs and can contribute to the development of indicators to address interregional imbalances in trade, foreign policy and beyond.",
keywords = "Ecosystem services flows, National ecosystem assessment, Interregional, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Thomas Koellner and Aletta Bonn and Sebastian Arnhold and Bagstad, {Kenneth J.} and Dor Fridman and Guerra, {Carlos A.} and Thomas Kastner and Meidad Kissinger and Janina Kleemann and Christian Kuhlicke and Jianguo Liu and Laura L{\'o}pez-Hoffman and Alexandra Marques and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Schulp, {Catharina J.E.} and Sarah Wolff and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "92--106",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows

AU - Koellner, Thomas

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Arnhold, Sebastian

AU - Bagstad, Kenneth J.

AU - Fridman, Dor

AU - Guerra, Carlos A.

AU - Kastner, Thomas

AU - Kissinger, Meidad

AU - Kleemann, Janina

AU - Kuhlicke, Christian

AU - Liu, Jianguo

AU - López-Hoffman, Laura

AU - Marques, Alexandra

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Schulp, Catharina J.E.

AU - Wolff, Sarah

AU - Schröter, Matthias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Ecosystem services (ES) assessments commonly focus on a specific biophysical region or nation and take its geographic borders as the system boundary. Most geographical regions are, however, not closed systems but are open and telecoupled with other regions, such that the use of ES in one location is dependent on ecosystem processes and ecological management in other locations. Interregional ES flows often affect national economies and may trigger issues of national security and global equity. To date, however, methodologies for assessing interregional flows of ES have been published in dispersed literature. This paper provides a three-step guidance for how to assess four different types of interregional ES flows (traded goods, passive biophysical flows, species migration and dispersal as well as information flows). This guidance is intended to complement national and regional ecosystem assessments. The three steps are to (i) define the goal and scope of interregional ES flow assessments, (ii) quantify the interregional ES flows using a tiered approach and (iii) interpret results in terms of uncertainties, consequences and governance options. We compile different indicators for assessing interregional ES flows and evaluate their suitability for national and regional ES assessments. Finally, to assess the implications of interregional ES flows for environmental sustainability and human well-being, we relate our flow indicators to the Sustainable Development Goals. This guidance towards systematic assessment of interregional ES flows provides a first step to measure and quantify externalised environmental costs and can contribute to the development of indicators to address interregional imbalances in trade, foreign policy and beyond.

AB - Ecosystem services (ES) assessments commonly focus on a specific biophysical region or nation and take its geographic borders as the system boundary. Most geographical regions are, however, not closed systems but are open and telecoupled with other regions, such that the use of ES in one location is dependent on ecosystem processes and ecological management in other locations. Interregional ES flows often affect national economies and may trigger issues of national security and global equity. To date, however, methodologies for assessing interregional flows of ES have been published in dispersed literature. This paper provides a three-step guidance for how to assess four different types of interregional ES flows (traded goods, passive biophysical flows, species migration and dispersal as well as information flows). This guidance is intended to complement national and regional ecosystem assessments. The three steps are to (i) define the goal and scope of interregional ES flow assessments, (ii) quantify the interregional ES flows using a tiered approach and (iii) interpret results in terms of uncertainties, consequences and governance options. We compile different indicators for assessing interregional ES flows and evaluate their suitability for national and regional ES assessments. Finally, to assess the implications of interregional ES flows for environmental sustainability and human well-being, we relate our flow indicators to the Sustainable Development Goals. This guidance towards systematic assessment of interregional ES flows provides a first step to measure and quantify externalised environmental costs and can contribute to the development of indicators to address interregional imbalances in trade, foreign policy and beyond.

KW - Ecosystem services flows

KW - National ecosystem assessment

KW - Interregional

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066285965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0df3f387-113d-364e-9fa6-da3458fa3a94/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 105

SP - 92

EP - 106

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -

Recently viewed

Projects

  1. Care4Care

Publications

  1. A Elbphilharmonie em discussão: vozes críticas desde Hamburgo. Um breve insight sobre o atual debate local
  2. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Mg–15Dy–1.5Zn Alloy with LPSO Phase
  3. Collaborative innovation online
  4. Identity construction and representation in education - centred internet memes
  5. Crime does pay (at least when it's violent)!
  6. Spielt es nur eine Rolle "was" gepromptet wird oder auch "wann" gepromptet wird.
  7. Einleitung
  8. Woanders Zuhause
  9. Effects of biodiversity strengthen over time as ecosystem functioning declines at low and increases at high biodiversity
  10. Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation
  11. Vibration training in Rehabilitation
  12. Lean management in hospitals
  13. The influence of teacher-trainings on in-service teachers’ expertise: a teacher-training-study on formative assessment in competency-oriented mathematics
  14. Modeling approach for the determination of material flow and welding conditions in porthole die extrusion with gas pocket formation
  15. Dynamische Modellierung der Sorption von Substanzen in einem hydrologischen Einzugsgebietsmodell anhand des Beispiels Phosphor
  16. Verkleben
  17. A meta-analytic reliability generalization of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ)
  18. Grain refinements of magnesium alloys inoculated by additions of external SiC particles
  19. Measuring at all scales: sourcing data for more flexible restoration references
  20. Web-based support for daily functioning of people with mild intellectual disabilities or chronic psychiatric disorders
  21. Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity
  22. Crowdfunding the Commons?
  23. Do Women on board of directors have an impact on corporate governance quality and firm performance?