From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

From Open Access to Open Science : The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication. / Heise, Christian; Pearce, Joshua M.

In: SAGE Open, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.04.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8c9b20c9ee5743af96a9fea7dd49dde6,
title = "From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication",
abstract = "Although opening up of research is considered an appropriate and trend-setting model for future scientific communication, it can still be difficult to put open science into practice. How open and transparent can a scientific work be? This article investigates the potential to make all information and the whole work process of a qualification project such as a doctoral thesis comprehensively and freely accessible on the internet with an open free license both in the final form and completely traceable in development. The answer to the initial question, the self-experiment and the associated demand for openness, posed several challenges for a doctoral student, the institution, and the examination regulations, which are still based on the publication of an individually written and completed work that cannot be viewed by the public during the creation process. In the case of data and other documents, publication is usually not planned even after completion. This state of affairs in the use of open science in the humanities will be compared with open science best practices in the physical sciences. The reasons and influencing factors for open developments in science and research are presented, empirically and experimentally tested in the development of the first completely open humanities-based PhD thesis. The results of this two-part study show that it is possible to publish everything related to the doctoral study, qualification, and research process as soon as possible, as comprehensively as possible, and under an open license.",
keywords = "academics, communication, communication studies, communication technologies, cultural communication, education, human communication, information science, information technology, knowledge, libraries, mass communication, media and society, new media, science, science communication, social sciences, sociology, technology, Media and communication studies",
author = "Christian Heise and Pearce, {Joshua M.}",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2158244020915900",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Open Access to Open Science

T2 - The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication

AU - Heise, Christian

AU - Pearce, Joshua M.

PY - 2020/4/1

Y1 - 2020/4/1

N2 - Although opening up of research is considered an appropriate and trend-setting model for future scientific communication, it can still be difficult to put open science into practice. How open and transparent can a scientific work be? This article investigates the potential to make all information and the whole work process of a qualification project such as a doctoral thesis comprehensively and freely accessible on the internet with an open free license both in the final form and completely traceable in development. The answer to the initial question, the self-experiment and the associated demand for openness, posed several challenges for a doctoral student, the institution, and the examination regulations, which are still based on the publication of an individually written and completed work that cannot be viewed by the public during the creation process. In the case of data and other documents, publication is usually not planned even after completion. This state of affairs in the use of open science in the humanities will be compared with open science best practices in the physical sciences. The reasons and influencing factors for open developments in science and research are presented, empirically and experimentally tested in the development of the first completely open humanities-based PhD thesis. The results of this two-part study show that it is possible to publish everything related to the doctoral study, qualification, and research process as soon as possible, as comprehensively as possible, and under an open license.

AB - Although opening up of research is considered an appropriate and trend-setting model for future scientific communication, it can still be difficult to put open science into practice. How open and transparent can a scientific work be? This article investigates the potential to make all information and the whole work process of a qualification project such as a doctoral thesis comprehensively and freely accessible on the internet with an open free license both in the final form and completely traceable in development. The answer to the initial question, the self-experiment and the associated demand for openness, posed several challenges for a doctoral student, the institution, and the examination regulations, which are still based on the publication of an individually written and completed work that cannot be viewed by the public during the creation process. In the case of data and other documents, publication is usually not planned even after completion. This state of affairs in the use of open science in the humanities will be compared with open science best practices in the physical sciences. The reasons and influencing factors for open developments in science and research are presented, empirically and experimentally tested in the development of the first completely open humanities-based PhD thesis. The results of this two-part study show that it is possible to publish everything related to the doctoral study, qualification, and research process as soon as possible, as comprehensively as possible, and under an open license.

KW - academics

KW - communication

KW - communication studies

KW - communication technologies

KW - cultural communication

KW - education

KW - human communication

KW - information science

KW - information technology

KW - knowledge

KW - libraries

KW - mass communication

KW - media and society

KW - new media

KW - science

KW - science communication

KW - social sciences

KW - sociology

KW - technology

KW - Media and communication studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084591392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/71b58450-cc4d-3d3c-a852-159f772453c0/

U2 - 10.1177/2158244020915900

DO - 10.1177/2158244020915900

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084591392

VL - 10

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

IS - 2

ER -

Documents

DOI