Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198. / Keller, S.; Chupakhin, S.; Staron, P. et al.
In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 255, 01.05.2018, p. 294-307.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Keller S, Chupakhin S, Staron P, Maawad E, Kashaev N, Klusemann B. Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2018 May 1;255:294-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.023

Bibtex

@article{0d77aa9827174b5fa5b7a07d03e7b143,
title = "Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198",
abstract = "Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue performance of metallic structures by introducing compressive residual stresses. The aim of this paper is the investigation of LSP of the aluminium alloy AA2198. This investigation includes the variation of the laser power density (2.78–25 GW/cm2) and the square laser focus (1 mm × 1 mm and 3 mm × 3 mm). Additionally, two different temper stages (T3 and T8) and thicknesses (3.2 mm and 4.8 mm) of AA2198 are considered. The study of the LSP process is split into two parts; at first, LSP experiments are performed to clarify the influence of the temper stage, the focus size, the laser power density and the thickness of the specimen on the residual stress field. Secondly, a process model based on the finite element method is employed which requires in particular the adjustment of a suitable laser induced pressure pulse. Due to the different yield strength and strain hardening behaviour of the different temper conditions, AA2198-T8 shows a lower penetration depth of compressive residual stresses compared to AA2198-T3. A smaller focus size leads to higher compressive residual stresses near the surface but a lower penetration depth. To investigate possible shock wave reflections, different base layers in the LSP process are investigated considering a free, a clamped and a glued back-side of the specimen. No differences in terms of resulting residual stresses were observed. The experimental study provides some preliminary assumptions which are used to simplify the simulation set-up. Residual stresses are measured by the incremental hole drilling method using electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) as well as synchrotron X-ray diffraction. The calculated residual stresses in the simulation are averaged layer-wise over a sample area for comparison with the measured residual stresses. The model is used to simulate the LSP process for the considered temper stages and focus sizes to predict the resulting residual stresses. Simulated and measured residual stress profiles show for the different cases very good agreement.",
keywords = "AA2198, Finite element analysis, Focus size, Hole drilling, Laser shock peening, Residual stress, Tempering conditions, X-ray diffraction, Engineering",
author = "S. Keller and S. Chupakhin and P. Staron and E. Maawad and N. Kashaev and B. Klusemann",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.023",
language = "English",
volume = "255",
pages = "294--307",
journal = "Journal of Materials Processing Technology",
issn = "0924-0136",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198

AU - Keller, S.

AU - Chupakhin, S.

AU - Staron, P.

AU - Maawad, E.

AU - Kashaev, N.

AU - Klusemann, B.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue performance of metallic structures by introducing compressive residual stresses. The aim of this paper is the investigation of LSP of the aluminium alloy AA2198. This investigation includes the variation of the laser power density (2.78–25 GW/cm2) and the square laser focus (1 mm × 1 mm and 3 mm × 3 mm). Additionally, two different temper stages (T3 and T8) and thicknesses (3.2 mm and 4.8 mm) of AA2198 are considered. The study of the LSP process is split into two parts; at first, LSP experiments are performed to clarify the influence of the temper stage, the focus size, the laser power density and the thickness of the specimen on the residual stress field. Secondly, a process model based on the finite element method is employed which requires in particular the adjustment of a suitable laser induced pressure pulse. Due to the different yield strength and strain hardening behaviour of the different temper conditions, AA2198-T8 shows a lower penetration depth of compressive residual stresses compared to AA2198-T3. A smaller focus size leads to higher compressive residual stresses near the surface but a lower penetration depth. To investigate possible shock wave reflections, different base layers in the LSP process are investigated considering a free, a clamped and a glued back-side of the specimen. No differences in terms of resulting residual stresses were observed. The experimental study provides some preliminary assumptions which are used to simplify the simulation set-up. Residual stresses are measured by the incremental hole drilling method using electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) as well as synchrotron X-ray diffraction. The calculated residual stresses in the simulation are averaged layer-wise over a sample area for comparison with the measured residual stresses. The model is used to simulate the LSP process for the considered temper stages and focus sizes to predict the resulting residual stresses. Simulated and measured residual stress profiles show for the different cases very good agreement.

AB - Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue performance of metallic structures by introducing compressive residual stresses. The aim of this paper is the investigation of LSP of the aluminium alloy AA2198. This investigation includes the variation of the laser power density (2.78–25 GW/cm2) and the square laser focus (1 mm × 1 mm and 3 mm × 3 mm). Additionally, two different temper stages (T3 and T8) and thicknesses (3.2 mm and 4.8 mm) of AA2198 are considered. The study of the LSP process is split into two parts; at first, LSP experiments are performed to clarify the influence of the temper stage, the focus size, the laser power density and the thickness of the specimen on the residual stress field. Secondly, a process model based on the finite element method is employed which requires in particular the adjustment of a suitable laser induced pressure pulse. Due to the different yield strength and strain hardening behaviour of the different temper conditions, AA2198-T8 shows a lower penetration depth of compressive residual stresses compared to AA2198-T3. A smaller focus size leads to higher compressive residual stresses near the surface but a lower penetration depth. To investigate possible shock wave reflections, different base layers in the LSP process are investigated considering a free, a clamped and a glued back-side of the specimen. No differences in terms of resulting residual stresses were observed. The experimental study provides some preliminary assumptions which are used to simplify the simulation set-up. Residual stresses are measured by the incremental hole drilling method using electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) as well as synchrotron X-ray diffraction. The calculated residual stresses in the simulation are averaged layer-wise over a sample area for comparison with the measured residual stresses. The model is used to simulate the LSP process for the considered temper stages and focus sizes to predict the resulting residual stresses. Simulated and measured residual stress profiles show for the different cases very good agreement.

KW - AA2198

KW - Finite element analysis

KW - Focus size

KW - Hole drilling

KW - Laser shock peening

KW - Residual stress

KW - Tempering conditions

KW - X-ray diffraction

KW - Engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038878698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.023

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85038878698

VL - 255

SP - 294

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Materials Processing Technology

JF - Journal of Materials Processing Technology

SN - 0924-0136

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Methods and compositions relating to a vaccine against prostate cancer
  2. Does self-control training improve self-control?
  3. Mindfulness as an intervention to improve self-control
  4. Effect of ECAP Process on the Activation of Deformation Mechanisms During Subsequent Uniaxial Tension of Mg-ZEWK2000 Sheets
  5. Leveraging LLMs in Scholarly Knowledge Graph Question Answering
  6. Assoggettamento/Soggettivazione
  7. Noninteracting force/motion control of defective manipulation systems
  8. Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting - and its Interaction with Eco-Efficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators
  9. On the geometric control of internal forces in power grasps
  10. Article 73 CISG
  11. Transformation in a changing climate
  12. Use of force
  13. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  14. The Connected Classroom
  15. Winning Ugly
  16. Effect of filler materials on the tensile properties and fracture toughness of laser beam welded AA2198 joints under different ageing conditions
  17. Analyis of a Potential Single and Combined Business Model for Stationary Battery Storage Systems
  18. Feature selection for density level-sets
  19. Measuring Variation in Gaze Following Across Communities, Ages, and Individuals
  20. "And in the end my street will not be the same"
  21. Anders als die anderen?
  22. Habitat suitability models in conservation planning – a short introduction
  23. Remotely sensed effectiveness assessments of protected areas lack a common framework
  24. Uncertainty in the river export modelling of pesticides and transformation products
  25. Implementing Environmental Management Accounting
  26. Article 5: Contracts of carriage