Energy transitions and national development indicators: A global review of nuclear energy production

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Energy transitions and national development indicators: A global review of nuclear energy production. / Gralla, Fabienne; Abson, David J.; Møller, Anders P. et al.
In: Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews, Vol. 70, 04.2017, p. 1251-1265.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{213e4d04b9b5436caccb5ae01c557aab,
title = "Energy transitions and national development indicators: A global review of nuclear energy production",
abstract = "Energy use plays a vital role for human well-being. However, human well-being can also be affected by socio-economic and environmental impacts associated with the use of different primary energy sources. Nuclear energy production is perceived as one means of satisfying national energy demand while contributing to a potentially sustainable energy transition. The objective of this study is to further understand socio-economic, environmental and technological factors that characterize countries that choose nuclear energy production. Hence, this exploratory study reviews the socio-economic contexts of nuclear energy producing countries in comparison to countries without nuclear energy use. The study is based on world development indicators published by World Bank for 213 countries between 1960 and 2013 and follows two analytical steps. First, based on a comparison of countries average development indicator values over time, we descriptively explore which socio-economic, environmental and technological factors characterize the spectrum of countries following different 'nuclear energy strategies' (no nuclear production, phase-out, planning to produce, produce nuclear energy). Second we statistically analyze nuclear energy producing countries, exploring if there was significant change in socio-economic, environmental and technological characteristics after the start of nuclear energy production. Characteristics of our four country groups revealed nuclear countries (incl. phase-out) used more energy per capita and showed higher levels of carbon emissions as well as household consumption compared to countries planning to use nuclear energy and countries without nuclear energy use. Adoption of nuclear energy does not appear to reduce fossil fuel use or enable energy independence. Hence, our study did not provide evidence that nuclear energy production can be seen as technological answer to global challenges like climate change or unequal energy distribution. It is therefore unclear if and how nuclear energy contributes to global human well-being as part of sustainable development.",
keywords = "Countries, Energy transitions, Nuclear energy, Sustainability, World development indicators, Sustainability Science",
author = "Fabienne Gralla and Abson, {David J.} and M{\o}ller, {Anders P.} and Lang, {Daniel J.} and {von Wehrden}, Henrik",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.026",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "1251--1265",
journal = "Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy transitions and national development indicators

T2 - A global review of nuclear energy production

AU - Gralla, Fabienne

AU - Abson, David J.

AU - Møller, Anders P.

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Energy use plays a vital role for human well-being. However, human well-being can also be affected by socio-economic and environmental impacts associated with the use of different primary energy sources. Nuclear energy production is perceived as one means of satisfying national energy demand while contributing to a potentially sustainable energy transition. The objective of this study is to further understand socio-economic, environmental and technological factors that characterize countries that choose nuclear energy production. Hence, this exploratory study reviews the socio-economic contexts of nuclear energy producing countries in comparison to countries without nuclear energy use. The study is based on world development indicators published by World Bank for 213 countries between 1960 and 2013 and follows two analytical steps. First, based on a comparison of countries average development indicator values over time, we descriptively explore which socio-economic, environmental and technological factors characterize the spectrum of countries following different 'nuclear energy strategies' (no nuclear production, phase-out, planning to produce, produce nuclear energy). Second we statistically analyze nuclear energy producing countries, exploring if there was significant change in socio-economic, environmental and technological characteristics after the start of nuclear energy production. Characteristics of our four country groups revealed nuclear countries (incl. phase-out) used more energy per capita and showed higher levels of carbon emissions as well as household consumption compared to countries planning to use nuclear energy and countries without nuclear energy use. Adoption of nuclear energy does not appear to reduce fossil fuel use or enable energy independence. Hence, our study did not provide evidence that nuclear energy production can be seen as technological answer to global challenges like climate change or unequal energy distribution. It is therefore unclear if and how nuclear energy contributes to global human well-being as part of sustainable development.

AB - Energy use plays a vital role for human well-being. However, human well-being can also be affected by socio-economic and environmental impacts associated with the use of different primary energy sources. Nuclear energy production is perceived as one means of satisfying national energy demand while contributing to a potentially sustainable energy transition. The objective of this study is to further understand socio-economic, environmental and technological factors that characterize countries that choose nuclear energy production. Hence, this exploratory study reviews the socio-economic contexts of nuclear energy producing countries in comparison to countries without nuclear energy use. The study is based on world development indicators published by World Bank for 213 countries between 1960 and 2013 and follows two analytical steps. First, based on a comparison of countries average development indicator values over time, we descriptively explore which socio-economic, environmental and technological factors characterize the spectrum of countries following different 'nuclear energy strategies' (no nuclear production, phase-out, planning to produce, produce nuclear energy). Second we statistically analyze nuclear energy producing countries, exploring if there was significant change in socio-economic, environmental and technological characteristics after the start of nuclear energy production. Characteristics of our four country groups revealed nuclear countries (incl. phase-out) used more energy per capita and showed higher levels of carbon emissions as well as household consumption compared to countries planning to use nuclear energy and countries without nuclear energy use. Adoption of nuclear energy does not appear to reduce fossil fuel use or enable energy independence. Hence, our study did not provide evidence that nuclear energy production can be seen as technological answer to global challenges like climate change or unequal energy distribution. It is therefore unclear if and how nuclear energy contributes to global human well-being as part of sustainable development.

KW - Countries

KW - Energy transitions

KW - Nuclear energy

KW - Sustainability

KW - World development indicators

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008223819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.026

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.026

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85008223819

VL - 70

SP - 1251

EP - 1265

JO - Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies
  2. Enhancement of strength and hot workability of AZX312 magnesium alloy by disintegrated melt deposition (DMD) processing in contrast to permanent mold casting
  3. Ästhetische Operationen in der kunstpädagogischen Praxis
  4. Digitale Medientechnologien
  5. "There is no alternative"
  6. Does online availability increase citations?
  7. Diagrammatische Visualisierung als ästhetische Information
  8. Einen Systemwandel brauchen wir nicht
  9. Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
  10. Die technologische Bedingung
  11. How General is Trust in "Most People" ?
  12. Enhancing firm performance and innovativeness through error management culture
  13. Der Guattari-Deleuze-Effekt
  14. Sense, seize, reconfigure
  15. Examination of the Biodegradation of the Antineoplastics Cyclophosphamide and Ifosfamide with the Closed Bottle Test (OECD 301 D)
  16. Chemistry and materials science for a sustainable circular polymeric economy
  17. Do Time Poor Individuals Pay More?
  18. On the theoretical concept of the potential natural vegetation and proposals for an up-to-date modification
  19. Climate Change: Implications for Europe's Security and Defence Policy
  20. Die Energiewende in Deutschland
  21. Die Evaluationspraxis an Deutschen Schulen
  22. Interhandel case
  23. Museum visitors and non-visitors in Germany: A representative survey
  24. Exports and firm characteristics
  25. Wider die Erinnerung
  26. Textadäquatheit als Indiz für Schreibkompetenz
  27. The 89ers in East and West Germany
  28. Christopher H. Achen / Larry M. Bartels: Democracy for Realists. Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press 2017
  29. Statutenkollisionslehre