1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Embedded, not plugged-in
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. / Robinson, Matthew Ryan.
In: Open Theology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 66-79.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Robinson, MR 2019, 'Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research', Open Theology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0005

APA

Robinson, M. R. (2019). Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. Open Theology, 5(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0005

Vancouver

Robinson MR. Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. Open Theology. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):66-79. doi: 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

Bibtex

@article{4a35a1a7a09f432ba5440be51468b6de,
title = "Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research",
abstract = "The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological {"}reboot{"} in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.",
keywords = "Colonizing knowledge, Digital theology, Systematic theology, Theological method, Theology",
author = "Robinson, {Matthew Ryan}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Matthew Ryan Robinson, published by De Gruyter.",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/opth-2019-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "66--79",
journal = "Open Theology",
issn = "2300-6579",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedded, not plugged-in

T2 - Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research

AU - Robinson, Matthew Ryan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Matthew Ryan Robinson, published by De Gruyter.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological "reboot" in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.

AB - The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological "reboot" in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.

KW - Colonizing knowledge

KW - Digital theology

KW - Systematic theology

KW - Theological method

KW - Theology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068709633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

DO - 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85068709633

VL - 5

SP - 66

EP - 79

JO - Open Theology

JF - Open Theology

SN - 2300-6579

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The importance of understanding the multiple dimensions of power in stakeholder participation for effective biodiversity conservation
  2. An idea and a person whose time had come
  3. A review on the use of calcium chloride in applied thermal engineering
  4. Differential Steering System for Vehicular Yaw Tracking Motion with Help of Sliding Mode Control
  5. From deforestation to blossom
  6. On walks in molecular graphs.
  7. Balanced Scorecard implementations – The case of a city hall
  8. Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research
  9. Effectiveness of error management training
  10. Instructional animation versus static pictures
  11. Modelling scenarios to identify a combined sediment-water management strategy for the large reservoirs of the Tuyamuyun hydro-complex
  12. Calendar
  13. Efficient control of formation flying spacecraft
  14. How students’ self-control and smartphone-use explain their academic performance
  15. Is Calluna vulgaris a suitable bio-monitor of management-mediated nutrient pools in heathland ecosystems?
  16. Risk management with management control systems
  17. Shared mobility business models
  18. A group-level theory of helping and altruism within and across group boundaries
  19. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options
  20. Towards a Real-world Laboratory
  21. Does participatory governance help address long-term environmental problems?
  22. Understanding Environmental Posts
  23. Learning pragmatic routines during study abroad
  24. Kafka pfeift auf den Ursprung des Kunstwerkes.
  25. Using LLMs in sensory service research
  26. New incremental methods for springback compensation by stress superposition
  27. Exploring the Use of the Pronoun I in German Academic Texts with Machine Learning
  28. Public Value
  29. European and national law in history and future
  30. Transformation archetypes in global food systems
  31. LiteraturGesellschaft DDR
  32. Emotional reactivity and interoceptive sensitivity
  33. BERT for stock market sentiment analysis
  34. Foraging loads of stingless bees and utilisation of stored nectar for pollen harvesting
  35. Bestimmbare Unbestimmtheiten
  36. Different ways lead to ambidexterity
  37. Approaching bolt load retention behaviour of AS41 through compliance and creep deformation
  38. Web-based occupational stress prevention in German micro- and small-sized enterprises – process evaluation results of an implementation study
  39. A meta-analytic reliability generalization of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ)