1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Embedded, not plugged-in
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. / Robinson, Matthew Ryan.
In: Open Theology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 66-79.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Robinson, MR 2019, 'Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research', Open Theology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0005

APA

Robinson, M. R. (2019). Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. Open Theology, 5(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0005

Vancouver

Robinson MR. Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research. Open Theology. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):66-79. doi: 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

Bibtex

@article{4a35a1a7a09f432ba5440be51468b6de,
title = "Embedded, not plugged-in: Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research",
abstract = "The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological {"}reboot{"} in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.",
keywords = "Colonizing knowledge, Digital theology, Systematic theology, Theological method, Theology",
author = "Robinson, {Matthew Ryan}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Matthew Ryan Robinson, published by De Gruyter.",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/opth-2019-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "66--79",
journal = "Open Theology",
issn = "2300-6579",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedded, not plugged-in

T2 - Digital humanities and fair participation in systematic theological research

AU - Robinson, Matthew Ryan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Matthew Ryan Robinson, published by De Gruyter.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological "reboot" in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.

AB - The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research-not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological "reboot" in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.

KW - Colonizing knowledge

KW - Digital theology

KW - Systematic theology

KW - Theological method

KW - Theology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068709633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

DO - 10.1515/opth-2019-0005

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85068709633

VL - 5

SP - 66

EP - 79

JO - Open Theology

JF - Open Theology

SN - 2300-6579

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Springer (Verlag)