Degradation of 5-FU by means of advanced (photo)oxidation processes: UV/H2O2, UV/Fe(2+)/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 - Comparison of transformation products, ready biodegradability and toxicity

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The present study investigates the degradation of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by three different advanced photo oxidation processes: UV/H2O2, UV/Fe(2+)/H2O2 and UV/TiO2. Prescreening experiments varying the H2O2 and TiO2 concentrations were performed in order to set the best catalyst concentrations in the UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 experiments, whereas the UV/Fe(2+)/H2O2 process was optimized varying the pH, Fe(2+) and H2O2 concentrations by means of the Box-Behnken design (BBD). 5-FU was quickly removed in all the irradiation experiments. The UV/Fe(2+)/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 processes achieved the highest degree of mineralization, whereas the lowest one resulted from the UV/H2O2 treatment. Six transformation products were formed during the advanced (photo)oxidation processes and identified using low and high resolution mass spectrometry. Most of them were formed and further eliminated during the reactions. The parent compound of 5-FU was not biodegraded, whereas the photolytic mixture formed in the UV/H2O2 treatment after 256min showed a noticeable improvement of the biodegradability in the closed bottle test (CBT) and was nontoxic towards Vibrio fischeri. In silico predictions showed positive alerts for mutagenic and genotoxic effects of 5-FU. In contrast, several of the transformation products (TPs) generated along the processes did not provide indications for mutagenic or genotoxic activity. One exception was TP with m/z 146 with positive alerts in several models of bacterial mutagenicity which could demand further experimental testing. Results demonstrate that advanced treatment can eliminate parent compounds and its toxicity. However, transformation products formed can still be toxic. Therefore toxicity screening after advanced treatment is recommendable.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Science of The Total Environment
Volume527-528
Pages (from-to)232-245
Number of pages14
ISSN0048-9697
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.09.2015

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Representation of Integration Profiles Using an Ontology
  2. Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership
  3. Structuring and advancing solution-oriented research for sustainability
  4. Alltag
  5. Phenotypic Plasticity Explains Response Patterns of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Saplings to Nitrogen Fertilization and Drought Events
  6. Towards a comparative international history of dockers
  7. Reconstructing the “biopiracy” debate from a justice perspective
  8. Sprachliche Heterogenität im gesellschaftswissenschaftlichen Unterricht
  9. Skill learning as a concept in life-span developmental psychology
  10. Tristan Garcia, Form and Object
  11. Why the future is democratic
  12. Analysis of mechanical properties and microstructure of single and double-pass friction stir welded T-joints for aluminium stiffened Panels
  13. Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more
  14. David und Batseba
  15. Responses of an arable crop rotation system to elevated [CO2]
  16. Valuing changes in ecosystem services: scenario analysis
  17. Simulierte Unfälle
  18. Der gefühlte Anspruch in der Haftpflichtversicherung
  19. The opportunity development process of nascent entrepreneurs
  20. Premiering a Mediaopera. On-Site. Online.
  21. Layoff Agency
  22. "Göttersymbole"
  23. Inducing Error Management Culture – Evidence From Experimental Team Studies
  24. Strategies for Reducing the Input of Pharmaceuticals into the Environment
  25. The European Commission’s Expert Groups
  26. Die Rentenreform in der Diskussion
  27. Risikobewusste Planung
  28. An intra-firm perspective on wage profiles and employment of older workers with special reference to human capital and deferred compensation
  29. Hierarchie
  30. Blockchain for the Circular Economy: Analysis of the Research-Practice Gap