Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Some recent experimental papers have claimed that contribution decisions in a public goods game (PGG) are more likely to be cooperative if based on intuition rather than reflection. In light of conflicting findings, this paper (i) reinvestigates the behavioral impact of so-called cognitive style in the PGG; and (ii) connects it with an earlier literature on the role of cognitive failure (confusion). This is motivated by the possibility that the method of time pressure, commonly used to identify cognitive style, invites confusion as a confounding factor. Two channels for such confounds are identified and experimentally tested: A heterogeneous treatment effect of time pressure depending on subjects’ confusion status and a direct impact of time pressure on subjects’ likelihood of being confused. Our reinvestigation of the behavioral impact of time pressure confirms that cognitive style matters, but that deliberation rather than intuition drives cooperation. The confounding effect of confusion is not found to be direct, but to operate through a heterogeneous treatment effect. Time pressure selectively reduces average contributions among those subjects whose contributions can confidently be interpreted as cooperative rather than confused.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume107
Pages (from-to)185-203
Number of pages19
ISSN0014-2921
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the German Ministry for Education and Research under grant OIUV1012. They are furthermore thankful for helpful comments by seminar participants at the ESA Zurich, the HSC New York, the ZEW Mannheim, the University of Chicago, the University of Sterling, the IMEBESS Oxford and the SBRCC workshop in Kiel.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.

    Research areas

  • Confusion, Cooperation, Experiment, Public goods games, Time pressure
  • Economics

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Herkunftsnachweise und verpflichtende Direktvermarktung
  2. Forschendes Lernen in der angewandten Sozialpsychologie
  3. Klimabedingte Änderungen im Wirtschaftssektor Tourismus
  4. Kommunale Abwasserbehandlung - Antibiotika in der Umwelt
  5. Having Too Many Options Can Make You a Worse Negotiator
  6. Environmental effects of sustainability management tools
  7. An economic analysis of payment for health care services
  8. The liquidity regulation and savings banks' liquid assets
  9. Evaluating the effectiveness of a human factors training
  10. International Sustainability Standards and Certification
  11. Smartphone = Smart Learning? Englischlernen per App und Co.
  12. Kollaborative Wissensnetzwerke in "Lernenden Verwaltungen"
  13. Medienwandel im Industrie- und Massenzeitalter (1830 - 1900)
  14. Zeig mir deine Clique, und ich sag dir, wie gern du liest ...
  15. Ecosystem services between sustainability and efficiency
  16. Predicting the Individual Mood Level based on Diary Data
  17. Environmental Regulation and Sustainable Competitiveness
  18. Nachhaltige Raumentwicklung und Geschlechterverhältnisse
  19. Nachhaltigkeit kommunizieren: eine konzeptionelle Rahmung
  20. Personalmanagement arbeitsmarktpolitischer Dienstleister
  21. Die Evaluierung des Bildungswesens in historischer Sicht
  22. Ecotoxicological evaluation of selected anticancer drugs
  23. "The people" and resistance against international business
  24. Rezension im erweiterten Forschungskontext: Macht & Medien
  25. Schreib-Lese-Prozesse, Lehrprozesse und Unterrichtsprozesse
  26. EMA Links with Management Systems and Other Stakeholders
  27. The concept of joint production and ecological economics
  28. Ästhetische Operationen in der kunstpädagogischen Praxis
  29. Corporate Environmental Management and Practices of SMEs
  30. Wörter im Gebrauch lernen: Fachwortschatz Sachunterricht.
  31. Alle Kinder für eine Schule – eine Schule für alle Kinder?