Connecting feedback to self-efficacy: Receiving and providing peer feedback in teacher education
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 70, 101062, 01.09.2021.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Connecting feedback to self-efficacy
T2 - Receiving and providing peer feedback in teacher education
AU - Prilop, Christopher Neil
AU - Weber, Kira Elena
AU - Prins, Frans J.
AU - Kleinknecht, Marc
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Feedback can play a vital role in fostering teacher self-efficacy. Social comparisons and feedback valence (positive vs. negative feedback) are assumed to have a large impact on self-efficacy. Therefore, how pre-service teachers perceive social comparisons and feedback valence in peer feedback and the extent to which pre-service teachers (bachelor/master students) and teacher trainers incorporate comments that can have an impact on self-efficacy into their peer feedback merit investigation. Two studies were conducted. The first showed that peer feedback consisting of a social comparison and with positive feedback valence resulted in greater willingness to improve and positive affect. The second study revealed that teacher trainers’ feedback was more specific, whereas bachelor students’ feedback contained more social comparisons than did master students’ and teacher trainers’. Future research and practical implications are discussed.
AB - Feedback can play a vital role in fostering teacher self-efficacy. Social comparisons and feedback valence (positive vs. negative feedback) are assumed to have a large impact on self-efficacy. Therefore, how pre-service teachers perceive social comparisons and feedback valence in peer feedback and the extent to which pre-service teachers (bachelor/master students) and teacher trainers incorporate comments that can have an impact on self-efficacy into their peer feedback merit investigation. Two studies were conducted. The first showed that peer feedback consisting of a social comparison and with positive feedback valence resulted in greater willingness to improve and positive affect. The second study revealed that teacher trainers’ feedback was more specific, whereas bachelor students’ feedback contained more social comparisons than did master students’ and teacher trainers’. Future research and practical implications are discussed.
KW - (Pre-service) teacher education
KW - Classroom video
KW - Content analysis
KW - Peer feedback
KW - Self-efficacy
KW - Educational science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109524049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101062
DO - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101062
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85109524049
VL - 70
JO - Studies in Educational Evaluation
JF - Studies in Educational Evaluation
SN - 0191-491X
M1 - 101062
ER -