TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication Assumptions in Consumer Research

T2 - An Alternative Socio-Cognitive Approach

AU - Ringberg, Torsten

AU - Reihlen, Markus

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Although communication appears natural to most people, the successful act of transferring meaning relies on an alignment of intricate interpretive processes between the sender and receiver. Yet the full range of these intricate processes is often oversimplified, homogenized, and molded according to each paradigm's narrow epistemological assumptions, leading to contradictory representations across paradigms. For example, within cognitivist and structuralist research the communicative act is portrayed as unproblematic as it engages objectified meaning structures embedded in the structures of texts, symbols, and social practices, which remain independent of (i.e., disembodied from) the interpreting mind. In contrast, in postmodernist research, communication is regarded as implausible as meaning is uniquely created by the receiver (regardless of what is intended by the sender). Although each major perspective provides some insights to the communicative act, the elegance of each camp's reasoning is undone by it not addressing the full complexity of communication as it actually exists. To provide a more comprehensive and internally consistent understanding of meaning transfer (i.e., communication) we introduce a socio-cognitive model that accounts for apparent objectivist and subjectivist outcomes. This framework situates meaning production within the mind, driven by the interaction between mental (private and/or cultural) models, cognitive (reflective and/or categorical) processing, and environmental feedback mechanisms.

AB - Although communication appears natural to most people, the successful act of transferring meaning relies on an alignment of intricate interpretive processes between the sender and receiver. Yet the full range of these intricate processes is often oversimplified, homogenized, and molded according to each paradigm's narrow epistemological assumptions, leading to contradictory representations across paradigms. For example, within cognitivist and structuralist research the communicative act is portrayed as unproblematic as it engages objectified meaning structures embedded in the structures of texts, symbols, and social practices, which remain independent of (i.e., disembodied from) the interpreting mind. In contrast, in postmodernist research, communication is regarded as implausible as meaning is uniquely created by the receiver (regardless of what is intended by the sender). Although each major perspective provides some insights to the communicative act, the elegance of each camp's reasoning is undone by it not addressing the full complexity of communication as it actually exists. To provide a more comprehensive and internally consistent understanding of meaning transfer (i.e., communication) we introduce a socio-cognitive model that accounts for apparent objectivist and subjectivist outcomes. This framework situates meaning production within the mind, driven by the interaction between mental (private and/or cultural) models, cognitive (reflective and/or categorical) processing, and environmental feedback mechanisms.

KW - Management studies

KW - communication theory

KW - cognitivist

KW - culturalist

KW - socio-cognitive

KW - private/cultural models

KW - reflective/categorical thinking

KW - communication theory

KW - cognitivist

KW - culturalist

KW - socio-cognitive

KW - private/cultural models

KW - reflective/categorical thinking

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/afbee9a2-7d4c-3b26-84ac-ec6286db0c64/

U2 - 10.1080/10253860802190512

DO - 10.1080/10253860802190512

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 11

SP - 173

EP - 189

JO - Consumption Markets & Culture

JF - Consumption Markets & Culture

SN - 1025-3866

IS - 3

ER -