Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators. / Woods, Carl T.; Veale, James; Fransen, Job et al.
In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 97 - 103.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Woods CT, Veale J, Fransen J, Robertson S, Collier N. Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2018 Jan 2;36(1):97 - 103. Epub 2017 Jan 26. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1282621

Bibtex

@article{f1980aeb051d4a108308555e328f27ac,
title = "Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators",
abstract = "​In team sport, classifying playing position based on a players{\textquoteright} expressed skill sets can provide a guide to talent identification by enabling the recognition of performance attributes relative to playing position. Here, elite junior Australian football players were a priori classified into 1 of 4 common playing positions; forward, midfield, defence, and ruck. Three analysis approaches were used to assess the extent to which 12 in-game skill performance indicators could classify playing position. These were a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest, and a PART decision list. The LDA produced classification accuracy of 56.8%, with class errors ranging from 19.6% (midfielders) to 75.0% (ruck). The random forest model performed at a slightly worse level (51.62%), with class errors ranging from 27.8% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). The decision list revealed 6 rules capable of classifying playing position at accuracy of 70.1%, with class errors ranging from 14.4% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). Although the PART decision list produced the greatest relative classification accuracy, the technical skill indicators reported were generally unable to accurately classify players according to their position using the 3 analysis approaches. This player homogeneity may complicate recruitment by constraining talent recruiter{\textquoteright}s ability to objectively recognise distinctive positional attributes.",
keywords = "discriminant analysis, machine learning, Performance analysis, random forest, rule induction, Physical education and sports",
author = "Woods, {Carl T.} and James Veale and Job Fransen and Sam Robertson and Neil Collier",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2017.1282621",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "97 -- 103",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators

AU - Woods, Carl T.

AU - Veale, James

AU - Fransen, Job

AU - Robertson, Sam

AU - Collier, Neil

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - ​In team sport, classifying playing position based on a players’ expressed skill sets can provide a guide to talent identification by enabling the recognition of performance attributes relative to playing position. Here, elite junior Australian football players were a priori classified into 1 of 4 common playing positions; forward, midfield, defence, and ruck. Three analysis approaches were used to assess the extent to which 12 in-game skill performance indicators could classify playing position. These were a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest, and a PART decision list. The LDA produced classification accuracy of 56.8%, with class errors ranging from 19.6% (midfielders) to 75.0% (ruck). The random forest model performed at a slightly worse level (51.62%), with class errors ranging from 27.8% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). The decision list revealed 6 rules capable of classifying playing position at accuracy of 70.1%, with class errors ranging from 14.4% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). Although the PART decision list produced the greatest relative classification accuracy, the technical skill indicators reported were generally unable to accurately classify players according to their position using the 3 analysis approaches. This player homogeneity may complicate recruitment by constraining talent recruiter’s ability to objectively recognise distinctive positional attributes.

AB - ​In team sport, classifying playing position based on a players’ expressed skill sets can provide a guide to talent identification by enabling the recognition of performance attributes relative to playing position. Here, elite junior Australian football players were a priori classified into 1 of 4 common playing positions; forward, midfield, defence, and ruck. Three analysis approaches were used to assess the extent to which 12 in-game skill performance indicators could classify playing position. These were a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest, and a PART decision list. The LDA produced classification accuracy of 56.8%, with class errors ranging from 19.6% (midfielders) to 75.0% (ruck). The random forest model performed at a slightly worse level (51.62%), with class errors ranging from 27.8% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). The decision list revealed 6 rules capable of classifying playing position at accuracy of 70.1%, with class errors ranging from 14.4% (midfielders) to 100% (ruck). Although the PART decision list produced the greatest relative classification accuracy, the technical skill indicators reported were generally unable to accurately classify players according to their position using the 3 analysis approaches. This player homogeneity may complicate recruitment by constraining talent recruiter’s ability to objectively recognise distinctive positional attributes.

KW - discriminant analysis

KW - machine learning

KW - Performance analysis

KW - random forest

KW - rule induction

KW - Physical education and sports

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010693229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2017.1282621

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2017.1282621

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28125339

AN - SCOPUS:85010693229

VL - 36

SP - 97

EP - 103

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 1

ER -