Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter
Standard
Modelling Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning. ed. / Neil Sang. Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 305-340 (Modelling Nature-based Solutions).
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?
AU - Gottwald, Sarah
AU - Janssen, Ron
AU - Raymond, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2020/3/13
Y1 - 2020/3/13
N2 - Ecosystem-based approaches are vital to addressing environmental issues and are crucial to buffering human communities against the adverse effects of climate change (Jones et al., 2012). The impacts of ecosystem-based projects have been considered within a range of societal challenge areas, such as wetland management (Max Finlayson et al., 2011), as well as across cross-cutting challenges of biodiversity conservation, public health and well-being (Kloos & Renaud, 2016). In most instances, researchers have drawn upon the ecosystem services framework for assessing the biophysical or economic value of ecosystem-based approaches (Liquete et al., 2015; Green et al., 2016), and for examining the potential for synergies and trade-offs between bundles of ecosystem services (Mouchet et al., 2017).
AB - Ecosystem-based approaches are vital to addressing environmental issues and are crucial to buffering human communities against the adverse effects of climate change (Jones et al., 2012). The impacts of ecosystem-based projects have been considered within a range of societal challenge areas, such as wetland management (Max Finlayson et al., 2011), as well as across cross-cutting challenges of biodiversity conservation, public health and well-being (Kloos & Renaud, 2016). In most instances, researchers have drawn upon the ecosystem services framework for assessing the biophysical or economic value of ecosystem-based approaches (Liquete et al., 2015; Green et al., 2016), and for examining the potential for synergies and trade-offs between bundles of ecosystem services (Mouchet et al., 2017).
KW - Environmental planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109226093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/9781108553827.010
DO - 10.1017/9781108553827.010
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781108428934
T3 - Modelling Nature-based Solutions
SP - 305
EP - 340
BT - Modelling Nature-based Solutions
A2 - Sang, Neil
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -