Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Standard

Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions? / Gottwald, Sarah; Janssen, Ron; Raymond, Christopher.
Modelling Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning. ed. / Neil Sang. Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 305-340 (Modelling Nature-based Solutions).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Harvard

Gottwald, S, Janssen, R & Raymond, C 2020, Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions? in N Sang (ed.), Modelling Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning. Modelling Nature-based Solutions, Cambridge University Press, pp. 305-340. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553827.010

APA

Gottwald, S., Janssen, R., & Raymond, C. (2020). Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions? In N. Sang (Ed.), Modelling Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning (pp. 305-340). (Modelling Nature-based Solutions). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553827.010

Vancouver

Gottwald S, Janssen R, Raymond C. Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions? In Sang N, editor, Modelling Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning. Cambridge University Press. 2020. p. 305-340. (Modelling Nature-based Solutions). doi: 10.1017/9781108553827.010

Bibtex

@inbook{1816923e270743239733140b7124d42b,
title = "Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?",
abstract = "Ecosystem-based approaches are vital to addressing environmental issues and are crucial to buffering human communities against the adverse effects of climate change (Jones et al., 2012). The impacts of ecosystem-based projects have been considered within a range of societal challenge areas, such as wetland management (Max Finlayson et al., 2011), as well as across cross-cutting challenges of biodiversity conservation, public health and well-being (Kloos & Renaud, 2016). In most instances, researchers have drawn upon the ecosystem services framework for assessing the biophysical or economic value of ecosystem-based approaches (Liquete et al., 2015; Green et al., 2016), and for examining the potential for synergies and trade-offs between bundles of ecosystem services (Mouchet et al., 2017).",
keywords = "Environmental planning",
author = "Sarah Gottwald and Ron Janssen and Christopher Raymond",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1017/9781108553827.010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108428934",
series = "Modelling Nature-based Solutions",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
pages = "305--340",
editor = "Neil Sang",
booktitle = "Modelling Nature-based Solutions",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?

AU - Gottwald, Sarah

AU - Janssen, Ron

AU - Raymond, Christopher

PY - 2020/3/13

Y1 - 2020/3/13

N2 - Ecosystem-based approaches are vital to addressing environmental issues and are crucial to buffering human communities against the adverse effects of climate change (Jones et al., 2012). The impacts of ecosystem-based projects have been considered within a range of societal challenge areas, such as wetland management (Max Finlayson et al., 2011), as well as across cross-cutting challenges of biodiversity conservation, public health and well-being (Kloos & Renaud, 2016). In most instances, researchers have drawn upon the ecosystem services framework for assessing the biophysical or economic value of ecosystem-based approaches (Liquete et al., 2015; Green et al., 2016), and for examining the potential for synergies and trade-offs between bundles of ecosystem services (Mouchet et al., 2017).

AB - Ecosystem-based approaches are vital to addressing environmental issues and are crucial to buffering human communities against the adverse effects of climate change (Jones et al., 2012). The impacts of ecosystem-based projects have been considered within a range of societal challenge areas, such as wetland management (Max Finlayson et al., 2011), as well as across cross-cutting challenges of biodiversity conservation, public health and well-being (Kloos & Renaud, 2016). In most instances, researchers have drawn upon the ecosystem services framework for assessing the biophysical or economic value of ecosystem-based approaches (Liquete et al., 2015; Green et al., 2016), and for examining the potential for synergies and trade-offs between bundles of ecosystem services (Mouchet et al., 2017).

KW - Environmental planning

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/06ce1502-737f-30ad-bcbe-13817c05c8d0/

U2 - 10.1017/9781108553827.010

DO - 10.1017/9781108553827.010

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781108428934

T3 - Modelling Nature-based Solutions

SP - 305

EP - 340

BT - Modelling Nature-based Solutions

A2 - Sang, Neil

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -