Bridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Bridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting. / Cabin, Robert J.; Clewell, Andre; Ingram, Mrill et al.
In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 783-788.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{68345235f2224acda5cceec9fa1d5dd7,
title = "Bridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting",
abstract = "Developing and strengthening a more mutualistic relationship between the science of restoration ecology and the practice of ecological restoration has been a central but elusive goal of SERI since its inaugural meeting in 1989. We surveyed the delegates to the 2009 SERI World Conference to learn more about their perceptions of and ideas for improving restoration science, practice, and scientist/practitioner relationships. The respondents' assessments of restoration practice were less optimistic than their assessments of restoration science. Only 26% believed that scientist/practitioner relationships were {"}generally mutually beneficial and supportive of each other,{"} and the {"}science-practice gap{"} was the second and third most frequently cited category of factors limiting the science and practice of restoration, respectively ({"}insufficient funding{"} was first in both cases). Although few faulted practitioners for ignoring available science, many criticized scientists for ignoring the pressing needs of practitioners and/or failing to effectively communicate their work to nonscientists. Most of the suggestions for bridging the gap between restoration science and practice focused on (1) developing the necessary political support for more funding of restoration science, practice, and outreach; and (2) creating alternative research paradigms to both facilitate on-the-ground projects and promote more mutualistic exchanges between scientists and practitioners. We suggest that one way to implement these recommendations is to create a {"}Restoration Extension Service{"} modeled after the United States Department of Agriculture's Cooperative Extension Service. We also recommend more events that bring together a fuller spectrum of restoration scientists, practitioners, and relevant stakeholders.",
keywords = "Alternative research paradigms, Practical relevance, Restoration extension service, Science-practice gap, SERI survey, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Cabin, {Robert J.} and Andre Clewell and Mrill Ingram and Tein McDonald and Vicky Temperton",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "783--788",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging Restoration Science and Practice

T2 - Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting

AU - Cabin, Robert J.

AU - Clewell, Andre

AU - Ingram, Mrill

AU - McDonald, Tein

AU - Temperton, Vicky

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Developing and strengthening a more mutualistic relationship between the science of restoration ecology and the practice of ecological restoration has been a central but elusive goal of SERI since its inaugural meeting in 1989. We surveyed the delegates to the 2009 SERI World Conference to learn more about their perceptions of and ideas for improving restoration science, practice, and scientist/practitioner relationships. The respondents' assessments of restoration practice were less optimistic than their assessments of restoration science. Only 26% believed that scientist/practitioner relationships were "generally mutually beneficial and supportive of each other," and the "science-practice gap" was the second and third most frequently cited category of factors limiting the science and practice of restoration, respectively ("insufficient funding" was first in both cases). Although few faulted practitioners for ignoring available science, many criticized scientists for ignoring the pressing needs of practitioners and/or failing to effectively communicate their work to nonscientists. Most of the suggestions for bridging the gap between restoration science and practice focused on (1) developing the necessary political support for more funding of restoration science, practice, and outreach; and (2) creating alternative research paradigms to both facilitate on-the-ground projects and promote more mutualistic exchanges between scientists and practitioners. We suggest that one way to implement these recommendations is to create a "Restoration Extension Service" modeled after the United States Department of Agriculture's Cooperative Extension Service. We also recommend more events that bring together a fuller spectrum of restoration scientists, practitioners, and relevant stakeholders.

AB - Developing and strengthening a more mutualistic relationship between the science of restoration ecology and the practice of ecological restoration has been a central but elusive goal of SERI since its inaugural meeting in 1989. We surveyed the delegates to the 2009 SERI World Conference to learn more about their perceptions of and ideas for improving restoration science, practice, and scientist/practitioner relationships. The respondents' assessments of restoration practice were less optimistic than their assessments of restoration science. Only 26% believed that scientist/practitioner relationships were "generally mutually beneficial and supportive of each other," and the "science-practice gap" was the second and third most frequently cited category of factors limiting the science and practice of restoration, respectively ("insufficient funding" was first in both cases). Although few faulted practitioners for ignoring available science, many criticized scientists for ignoring the pressing needs of practitioners and/or failing to effectively communicate their work to nonscientists. Most of the suggestions for bridging the gap between restoration science and practice focused on (1) developing the necessary political support for more funding of restoration science, practice, and outreach; and (2) creating alternative research paradigms to both facilitate on-the-ground projects and promote more mutualistic exchanges between scientists and practitioners. We suggest that one way to implement these recommendations is to create a "Restoration Extension Service" modeled after the United States Department of Agriculture's Cooperative Extension Service. We also recommend more events that bring together a fuller spectrum of restoration scientists, practitioners, and relevant stakeholders.

KW - Alternative research paradigms

KW - Practical relevance

KW - Restoration extension service

KW - Science-practice gap

KW - SERI survey

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049462545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:78049462545

VL - 18

SP - 783

EP - 788

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Humanentwicklung, Systemwettbewerb und Demokratie
  2. Vehicle routing planning with joint distribution
  3. CDS spreads, systemic risk and interconnectedness
  4. „Wie wäre es, an psychische Krankheiten zu glauben?“
  5. Öffentliche Räume für Frauen im ländlichen Raum
  6. The role of solutes for grain refinement by (SiC)P
  7. Der Sound und sein soziotechnischer Resonanzraum
  8. Die bilanzielle Behandlung von Handy-Subventionen
  9. Methoden zur Erfolgsmessung im Regionalmarketing
  10. Organisationsentwicklung als Personalentwicklung
  11. Human development and the "explosion" of democracy
  12. Technology Development and Stakeholder Influence
  13. Kooperationen von Managementberatungsunternehmen
  14. Innovations for enabling urban climate governance
  15. Aufbau und Organisation von Entwicklungsprojekten
  16. Geschlechtsspezifische Wirkung von Anreizsystemen?
  17. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  18. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook
  19. Politikberatung in den USA: Ein Vorbild für Europa?
  20. Frauen und Führung- auf das Management kommt es an
  21. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  22. Die Hälfte des Himmels, nicht die Hälfte des Mülls
  23. Geschlechterdemokratie als Maßnahme gegen Gewalt
  24. Tactical and strategic choices in business models
  25. Optimizing price levels in e-commerce applications
  26. Analyse regionaler Marktstrukturen im Kreditwesen
  27. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  28. § 4 Grundzüge des materiellen Fusionskontrollrechts
  29. Extrusion of profiles with variable wall thickness
  30. Dispatching rule selection with Gaussian processes
  31. Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung und Diffusion
  32. Microstructure and thermal response of Mg-Sn alloys
  33. Repräsentation und Partizipation in Organisationen
  34. Political Parties, Elections and Ethnicity in Kenya
  35. Die betriebsratsfreie Zone aus ökonomischer Sicht
  36. Mit "gesunder" Mischung zu Stabilität und Integration?
  37. Automotive applications of magnesium and its alloys
  38. Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies:
  39. The Power Politics of International Tax Cooperation
  40. Weiterentwicklung der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  41. Technological governance - technological citizenship?
  42. Kopplungsprobleme wissensorientierter Kommunikation
  43. Switching Dispatching Rules with Gaussian Processes
  44. Annäherungen an ein sozial-ökologisches Raumkonzept
  45. Partizipationsforschung und nachhaltige Entwicklung
  46. Basic investigations in incremental profile forming
  47. Neue Formen der Beschäftigung - neue Personalpolitik?
  48. Microstructural approaches of engineering materials
  49. Weiterentwicklung der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  50. Micro and Macro Perspectives in Organization Theory