Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government. / Scheel, Stephan.
In: European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.11.2020, p. 571-590.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f8aa04caa53d47e19dbfc35506be1018,
title = "Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government",
abstract = "Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.",
keywords = "Biopolitics, governmentality, performativity, politics of method, statistics, Sociology",
author = "Stephan Scheel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1368431019900096",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "571--590",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biopolitical bordering

T2 - Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government

AU - Scheel, Stephan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.

AB - Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.

KW - Biopolitics

KW - governmentality

KW - performativity

KW - politics of method

KW - statistics

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078402438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368431019900096

DO - 10.1177/1368431019900096

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85078402438

VL - 23

SP - 571

EP - 590

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Elena Hohensee

Publications

  1. Otfried Krzyzanowski: "Unser täglich Gift". Gesammelte Werke
  2. Wege in der Philosophie
  3. The legacy of Idealism and the rise of academic aesthetics
  4. Earnings baths by bank CEOs during turnovers
  5. Regierungszentralen und Policy-Integration
  6. Artikel 25 EUV [Handlungsformen]
  7. To Bid or Not To Bid?
  8. Konsum als Modus der Vergesellschaftung
  9. Flächenrevitalisierung in Kaliningrad
  10. Municipal wastewater treatment and biomass accumulation with a wastewater-born and settleable algal-bacterial culture
  11. Gender Equality in Academia
  12. Raumkonsum als Produktion von Orten
  13. Energy Transition in Germany
  14. An Experimental Study of Cultural Identity Goal Striving in German-Turkish Biculturals
  15. Supply Chain Information in Environmental Management Accounting
  16. The Conjoined Twin Sisters Helen and Judith (1701-1723) and Their Pictorial Impact in Later 18th-Century Science
  17. Waldwirtschaft
  18. Sustainable Entrepreneurship as a Research Field?
  19. Big Drama - Small Spaces
  20. § 394 Berichte der Aufsichtsratmitglieder
  21. Re-Formulierung des Privaten
  22. High temperature strength and hot working technology for As-cast Mg-1Zn-1Ca (ZX11) alloy
  23. Sachtexte
  24. Vertragsärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis
  25. Diversitätsbezogene Einstellungen von Lehramtsstudierenden
  26. Störung als Normalfall
  27. Von 1700 bis ins 3. Jahrtausend
  28. THE RADICAL ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN POLITICAL IMAGINATION AND PRODUCTION OF COMMON FUTURE IN BELARUSIAN PROTESTS
  29. San Antonio Statement on brominated and chlorinated flame retardants
  30. Akteur – Individuum – Subjekt
  31. (Dis) integrated valuation