Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government. / Scheel, Stephan.
in: European Journal of Social Theory, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 4, 01.11.2020, S. 571-590.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f8aa04caa53d47e19dbfc35506be1018,
title = "Biopolitical bordering: Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government",
abstract = "Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.",
keywords = "Biopolitics, governmentality, performativity, politics of method, statistics, Sociology",
author = "Stephan Scheel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1368431019900096",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "571--590",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biopolitical bordering

T2 - Enacting populations as intelligible objects of government

AU - Scheel, Stephan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.

AB - Since Foucault introduced the notion of biopolitics, it has been fiercely debated—usually in highly generalized terms—how to interpret and use this concept. This article argues that these discussions need to be situated, as biopolitics have features that do not travel from one site to the next. This becomes apparent if we attend to an aspect of biopolitics that has only received scant attention so far: the knowledge practices required to constitute populations as intelligible objects of government. To illustrate this point, the article focuses on processes of biopolitical bordering: the delineation of the target population that is to be known via statistical practices. Drawing on the example of Estonia I show that methodological decisions involved in this work have important biopolitical implications as they affect the size and composition of the population, thus shaping the design of programmes of government aiming at its regulation.

KW - Biopolitics

KW - governmentality

KW - performativity

KW - politics of method

KW - statistics

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078402438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368431019900096

DO - 10.1177/1368431019900096

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85078402438

VL - 23

SP - 571

EP - 590

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Geschicktes Geben
  2. Ecosystem services tradeoffs arising from non-native tree plantation expansion in southern Chile
  3. Eliten in Deutschland
  4. Außervertragliche Haftung der EG, zuständiges Gericht
  5. Transformation von Schule durch inklusiven Nawi-Unterricht
  6. Worauf soll man beim Vortrag achten? sprecherisch-rhetorische Grundqualifikationen zur Verbesserung der Präsentationsleistung
  7. Do women benefit from competitive markets?
  8. Die Germanistin Agathe Lasch (1879-1942)
  9. From trade-offs to synergies in food security and biodiversity conservation
  10. Beschäftigungstrends Niedersachsen 2006
  11. Through the Lens of Kara Walker’s Artwork
  12. The Forgotten Pioneer Movement
  13. Rauchen und passivrauchen am arbeitsplatz
  14. Mentoring und Coaching an der Universität
  15. Recht auf das Vergessenwerden im Digitalzeitalter
  16. Der letzte Wille einer Showgröße
  17. Assessing difficulties in career decision making among Swiss adolescents with the German My Vocational Situation Scale
  18. Zur Krahl-Rezeption in Frankreich
  19. Enrichment of mutated K-RAS from human stool DNA by a combined magnetic capture hybridization and PCR-RFLP assay.
  20. Koloniale Spuren in Oldenburg
  21. Leiblichkeit und Personalität
  22. Acoustic textures in distance perception
  23. Dramaturgies of Theatrical Imagination
  24. Termineinhaltung versus Bestände - Positionierung mit einem Estscheidungsmodell
  25. Deal or No Deal? Modelling the Impact of Brexit Uncertainty on UK Private Equity Activity
  26. Verkehrswissenschaftliche Arbeiten 12
  27. Kommunikation zwischen Anwalt und Mandant
  28. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system
  29. Nonverbale Kommunikation