Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity. / Klusemann, Benjamin; Svendsen, Bob; Bargmann, Swantje.
In: GAMM Mitteilungen, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2013, p. 219-238.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b637687431a84911bacc18dc5e8b49d5,
title = "Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity",
abstract = "The purpose of the current work is the formulation and comparison of two finite element algorithms for a dislocation density based crystal plasticity model. We study multiscale inelastic materials whose behavior is influenced by the evolution of inelastic microstructure and the corresponding material or internal lengthscales. The work is an extension of the first investigation in Klusemann et al. [1] which was limited to a one-dimensional bar. In the γ -algorithm, the displacement u and glide system slips γα are global unknowns and determined via weak field relations. The non-dimensional densities of geometrically necessary dislocations {\=ρ}α are local quantities and solved for via a strong field relation. In the Q -algorithm, both the displacement uand dislocation densities {\=ρ}α are modeled as global, and the glide system slips γα as local. As it turns out, both algorithms generally predict the same microstructural behavior on a single crystal level. However, for a polycrystal the two solution strategies predict different material behaviors due to the formulation-dependent representation of the boundary conditions. The introduction of a boundary layer in the model leads to good agreement between both algorithms for single and polycrystal simulations.",
keywords = "Engineering, algorithmic variational, boundary element, dislocation density, dual mixed, gradient crystal plasticity",
author = "Benjamin Klusemann and Bob Svendsen and Swantje Bargmann",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/gamm.201310013",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "219--238",
journal = "GAMM Mitteilungen",
issn = "0936-7195",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity

AU - Klusemann, Benjamin

AU - Svendsen, Bob

AU - Bargmann, Swantje

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The purpose of the current work is the formulation and comparison of two finite element algorithms for a dislocation density based crystal plasticity model. We study multiscale inelastic materials whose behavior is influenced by the evolution of inelastic microstructure and the corresponding material or internal lengthscales. The work is an extension of the first investigation in Klusemann et al. [1] which was limited to a one-dimensional bar. In the γ -algorithm, the displacement u and glide system slips γα are global unknowns and determined via weak field relations. The non-dimensional densities of geometrically necessary dislocations ρ̄α are local quantities and solved for via a strong field relation. In the Q -algorithm, both the displacement uand dislocation densities ρ̄α are modeled as global, and the glide system slips γα as local. As it turns out, both algorithms generally predict the same microstructural behavior on a single crystal level. However, for a polycrystal the two solution strategies predict different material behaviors due to the formulation-dependent representation of the boundary conditions. The introduction of a boundary layer in the model leads to good agreement between both algorithms for single and polycrystal simulations.

AB - The purpose of the current work is the formulation and comparison of two finite element algorithms for a dislocation density based crystal plasticity model. We study multiscale inelastic materials whose behavior is influenced by the evolution of inelastic microstructure and the corresponding material or internal lengthscales. The work is an extension of the first investigation in Klusemann et al. [1] which was limited to a one-dimensional bar. In the γ -algorithm, the displacement u and glide system slips γα are global unknowns and determined via weak field relations. The non-dimensional densities of geometrically necessary dislocations ρ̄α are local quantities and solved for via a strong field relation. In the Q -algorithm, both the displacement uand dislocation densities ρ̄α are modeled as global, and the glide system slips γα as local. As it turns out, both algorithms generally predict the same microstructural behavior on a single crystal level. However, for a polycrystal the two solution strategies predict different material behaviors due to the formulation-dependent representation of the boundary conditions. The introduction of a boundary layer in the model leads to good agreement between both algorithms for single and polycrystal simulations.

KW - Engineering

KW - algorithmic variational

KW - boundary element

KW - dislocation density

KW - dual mixed

KW - gradient crystal plasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900538080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/385ccfe6-1450-3b9a-997f-7c53cfa42157/

U2 - 10.1002/gamm.201310013

DO - 10.1002/gamm.201310013

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84900538080

VL - 36

SP - 219

EP - 238

JO - GAMM Mitteilungen

JF - GAMM Mitteilungen

SN - 0936-7195

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Enabling Leadership for Transformational Teaching and Learning for sustainable development (ELTT) Workshop
  2. Symposium "Creating Effects"
  3. Comparative Perspectives on Social Values and Modernization - 2011
  4. Towards a New Aesthetic Paradigm
  5. On the structurual Richness of Art Historical Discourse
  6. Universität Wien
  7. Academy of Management (Externe Organisation)
  8. Benefits of the Bottom Line and Beyond: Corporate Volunteering in Germany
  9. Life cycle engineering (LCE) of pharmaceuticals: systematic optimization for use as well as the environment.
  10. 'Can you play a new CD,please?' Speech act representation in EFL textbooks: An interlanguage pragmatic appraisal (Universität Gießen, invited talk)
  11. Establishing real-life laboratories: a transdisciplinary approach.
  12. The Sustainability of Local Living Economies. Exploratory evaluative transition research using Rough Set Analysis.
  13. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  14. Results of the German Subtask D Activities.
  15. Qualitative Methodology in Contemporary History and Related Fields - 2009
  16. Research on Cytotoxics in the Environment.
  17. Academy of Management (Externe Organisation)
  18. Optimization of solid phase extraction of Beta-blockers from hospital effluent by Response Surface Methodology
  19. Cambridge University Press (Verlag)
  20. Global Studies Quarterly (Fachzeitschrift)
  21. “Human Impacts & Exploring Sanctions Termination”
  22. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  23. ARL-Kongress 2012
  24. International Journal of Business Environment (Zeitschrift)
  25. Vortrag: "Another World is Possible. Ökotopia und die Aufgabe der Geisteswissenschaften."
  26. Journal of European Public Policy (Fachzeitschrift)

Press / Media

  1. In Gottes Namen, A(t)men