Affective Labour and Alienation: Spinoza’s Materialism and the Sad Passions of Post-Fordist Work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Affective Labour and Alienation: Spinoza’s Materialism and the Sad Passions of Post-Fordist Work. / Trott, Ben.
In: Emotion, Space and Society, Vol. 25, 11.2017, p. 119-126.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5945b51e861e4a10bb67f10722348594,
title = "Affective Labour and Alienation: Spinoza{\textquoteright}s Materialism and the Sad Passions of Post-Fordist Work",
abstract = "This paper examines the alienation entailed in contemporary emotional and affective labour and the ways this might be overcome. I identify the shifts in the nature and function of this labour since it first received attention by feminist and other scholars in the 1970s and '80s. And I point towards the emergence of contemporary struggles to limit the emotional intensity of the working day, similar in some ways to those Karl Marx once described around its length. My primary wager is that overcoming the forms of alienation at stake in the putting to work of personality, subjectivity, and self, need not be understood as a largely idealist question of {\textquoteleft}de-alienation{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}de-reification{\textquoteright}. Rather, drawing on Benedict de Spinoza's work on the body, mind, and affects, I suggest it is one of organising material encounters between bodies and their joining together through the construction of {\textquoteleft}common notions{\textquoteright}, reason, and a more {\textquoteleft}real{\textquoteright} understanding of the social world as well as one{\textquoteright}s location within it. I argue that, in approaching such a project, feminist and other methods of {\textquoteleft}consciousness-raising{\textquoteright} may prove of greater use than many traditional approaches to developing and delivering {\textquoteleft}class consciousness{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Gender and Diversity, Philosophy, Politics",
author = "Ben Trott",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.emospa.2016.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "Emotion, Space and Society",
issn = "1755-4586",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective Labour and Alienation

T2 - Spinoza’s Materialism and the Sad Passions of Post-Fordist Work

AU - Trott, Ben

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - This paper examines the alienation entailed in contemporary emotional and affective labour and the ways this might be overcome. I identify the shifts in the nature and function of this labour since it first received attention by feminist and other scholars in the 1970s and '80s. And I point towards the emergence of contemporary struggles to limit the emotional intensity of the working day, similar in some ways to those Karl Marx once described around its length. My primary wager is that overcoming the forms of alienation at stake in the putting to work of personality, subjectivity, and self, need not be understood as a largely idealist question of ‘de-alienation’ or ‘de-reification’. Rather, drawing on Benedict de Spinoza's work on the body, mind, and affects, I suggest it is one of organising material encounters between bodies and their joining together through the construction of ‘common notions’, reason, and a more ‘real’ understanding of the social world as well as one’s location within it. I argue that, in approaching such a project, feminist and other methods of ‘consciousness-raising’ may prove of greater use than many traditional approaches to developing and delivering ‘class consciousness’.

AB - This paper examines the alienation entailed in contemporary emotional and affective labour and the ways this might be overcome. I identify the shifts in the nature and function of this labour since it first received attention by feminist and other scholars in the 1970s and '80s. And I point towards the emergence of contemporary struggles to limit the emotional intensity of the working day, similar in some ways to those Karl Marx once described around its length. My primary wager is that overcoming the forms of alienation at stake in the putting to work of personality, subjectivity, and self, need not be understood as a largely idealist question of ‘de-alienation’ or ‘de-reification’. Rather, drawing on Benedict de Spinoza's work on the body, mind, and affects, I suggest it is one of organising material encounters between bodies and their joining together through the construction of ‘common notions’, reason, and a more ‘real’ understanding of the social world as well as one’s location within it. I argue that, in approaching such a project, feminist and other methods of ‘consciousness-raising’ may prove of greater use than many traditional approaches to developing and delivering ‘class consciousness’.

KW - Gender and Diversity

KW - Philosophy

KW - Politics

U2 - 10.1016/j.emospa.2016.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.emospa.2016.12.003

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 25

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - Emotion, Space and Society

JF - Emotion, Space and Society

SN - 1755-4586

ER -