Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis. / Van Ballegooijen, Wouter; Cuijpers, Pim; Van Straten, Annemieke et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 7, e100674, 16.07.2014.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Van Ballegooijen, W, Cuijpers, P, Van Straten, A, Karyotaki, E, Andersson, G, Smit, JH & Riper, H 2014, 'Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis', PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 7, e100674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100674

APA

Van Ballegooijen, W., Cuijpers, P., Van Straten, A., Karyotaki, E., Andersson, G., Smit, J. H., & Riper, H. (2014). Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(7), Article e100674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100674

Vancouver

Van Ballegooijen W, Cuijpers P, Van Straten A, Karyotaki E, Andersson G, Smit JH et al. Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e100674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100674

Bibtex

@article{3a33cd43c5fd4198912329b139d87a99,
title = "Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is an effective and acceptable treatment for depression, especially when it includes guidance, but its treatment adherence has not yet been systematically studied. We conducted a meta-analysis, comparing the adherence to guided iCBT with the adherence to individual face-to-face CBT. Methods: Studies were selected from a database of trials that investigate treatment for adult depression (see www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org), updated to January 2013. We identified 24 studies describing 26 treatment conditions (14 face-to-face CBT, 12 guided iCBT), by means of these inclusion criteria: targeting depressed adults, no comorbid somatic disorder or substance abuse, community recruitment, published in the year 2000 or later. The main outcome measure was the percentage of completed sessions. We also coded the percentage of treatment completers (separately coding for 100% or at least 80% of treatment completed). Results: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial that met our inclusion criteria. Face-to-face CBT treatments ranged from 12 to 28 sessions, guided iCBT interventions consisted of 5 to 9 sessions. Participants in face-to-face CBT completed on average 83.9% of their treatment, which did not differ significantly from participants in guided iCBT (80.8%, P = .59). The percentage of completers (total intervention) was significantly higher in face-to-face CBT (84.7%) than in guided iCBT (65.1%, P < .001), as was the percentage of completers of 80% or more of the intervention (face-to-face CBT: 85.2%, guided iCBT: 67.5%, P = .003). Non-completers of face-to-face CBT completed on average 24.5% of their treatment, while non-completers of guided iCBT completed on average 42.1% of their treatment. Conclusion: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial. Adherence to guided iCBT appears to be adequate and could be equal to adherence to face-to-face CBT.",
keywords = "Health sciences, cognitive therapy, depression, cognitive behavioural therapy, self help",
author = "{Van Ballegooijen}, Wouter and Pim Cuijpers and {Van Straten}, Annemieke and Eirini Karyotaki and Gerhard Andersson and Smit, {Jan H.} and Heleen Riper",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0100674",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Van Ballegooijen, Wouter

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Van Straten, Annemieke

AU - Karyotaki, Eirini

AU - Andersson, Gerhard

AU - Smit, Jan H.

AU - Riper, Heleen

PY - 2014/7/16

Y1 - 2014/7/16

N2 - Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is an effective and acceptable treatment for depression, especially when it includes guidance, but its treatment adherence has not yet been systematically studied. We conducted a meta-analysis, comparing the adherence to guided iCBT with the adherence to individual face-to-face CBT. Methods: Studies were selected from a database of trials that investigate treatment for adult depression (see www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org), updated to January 2013. We identified 24 studies describing 26 treatment conditions (14 face-to-face CBT, 12 guided iCBT), by means of these inclusion criteria: targeting depressed adults, no comorbid somatic disorder or substance abuse, community recruitment, published in the year 2000 or later. The main outcome measure was the percentage of completed sessions. We also coded the percentage of treatment completers (separately coding for 100% or at least 80% of treatment completed). Results: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial that met our inclusion criteria. Face-to-face CBT treatments ranged from 12 to 28 sessions, guided iCBT interventions consisted of 5 to 9 sessions. Participants in face-to-face CBT completed on average 83.9% of their treatment, which did not differ significantly from participants in guided iCBT (80.8%, P = .59). The percentage of completers (total intervention) was significantly higher in face-to-face CBT (84.7%) than in guided iCBT (65.1%, P < .001), as was the percentage of completers of 80% or more of the intervention (face-to-face CBT: 85.2%, guided iCBT: 67.5%, P = .003). Non-completers of face-to-face CBT completed on average 24.5% of their treatment, while non-completers of guided iCBT completed on average 42.1% of their treatment. Conclusion: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial. Adherence to guided iCBT appears to be adequate and could be equal to adherence to face-to-face CBT.

AB - Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is an effective and acceptable treatment for depression, especially when it includes guidance, but its treatment adherence has not yet been systematically studied. We conducted a meta-analysis, comparing the adherence to guided iCBT with the adherence to individual face-to-face CBT. Methods: Studies were selected from a database of trials that investigate treatment for adult depression (see www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org), updated to January 2013. We identified 24 studies describing 26 treatment conditions (14 face-to-face CBT, 12 guided iCBT), by means of these inclusion criteria: targeting depressed adults, no comorbid somatic disorder or substance abuse, community recruitment, published in the year 2000 or later. The main outcome measure was the percentage of completed sessions. We also coded the percentage of treatment completers (separately coding for 100% or at least 80% of treatment completed). Results: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial that met our inclusion criteria. Face-to-face CBT treatments ranged from 12 to 28 sessions, guided iCBT interventions consisted of 5 to 9 sessions. Participants in face-to-face CBT completed on average 83.9% of their treatment, which did not differ significantly from participants in guided iCBT (80.8%, P = .59). The percentage of completers (total intervention) was significantly higher in face-to-face CBT (84.7%) than in guided iCBT (65.1%, P < .001), as was the percentage of completers of 80% or more of the intervention (face-to-face CBT: 85.2%, guided iCBT: 67.5%, P = .003). Non-completers of face-to-face CBT completed on average 24.5% of their treatment, while non-completers of guided iCBT completed on average 42.1% of their treatment. Conclusion: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial. Adherence to guided iCBT appears to be adequate and could be equal to adherence to face-to-face CBT.

KW - Health sciences

KW - cognitive therapy

KW - depression

KW - cognitive behavioural therapy

KW - self help

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904349901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/28e1bb75-514e-3bbe-bb72-494e9ef90395/

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0100674

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0100674

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 25029507

AN - SCOPUS:84904349901

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e100674

ER -

Documents

DOI