When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany. / Koß, Michael.
in: Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 31.01.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{105c085a9c9e42bc8fe452dc06c62431,
title = "When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany",
abstract = "This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.",
keywords = "Politics, case study, donations, germany, ideational policy stabilisation, party funding, process-tracing analysis, qualitative content analysis",
author = "Michael Ko{\ss}",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/ipo.2023.31",
language = "English",
journal = "Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica",
issn = "0048-8402",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When (and how) ideas become arguments

T2 - the regulation of party donations in Germany

AU - Koß, Michael

PY - 2024/1/31

Y1 - 2024/1/31

N2 - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

AB - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

KW - Politics

KW - case study

KW - donations

KW - germany

KW - ideational policy stabilisation

KW - party funding

KW - process-tracing analysis

KW - qualitative content analysis

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica/article/when-and-how-ideas-become-arguments-the-regulation-of-party-donations-in-germany/1FD5F71F7D61FBBF8922BF221706B2EA#article

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/070bad51-49fb-315d-ad32-b0bdf3ba6b49/

U2 - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

DO - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

M3 - Journal articles

JO - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

JF - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

SN - 0048-8402

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Lehrerfortbildung 2013
  2. Politolinguistics as an approach to Populism
  3. Zugang! Kunstprojekte für das französische Minitel-System, 1985
  4. Perk or peril? Making sense of difference at the start of interorganizational collaboration
  5. Kölner Wissenschaftsverlag (Verlag)
  6. Politikberatung
  7. The US Presidential Election 2012
  8. 1621: 400 Jahre Universität Rinteln
  9. 2nd EqUIP Symposium 2016
  10. 10th IFIP TC 9 International Conference on Human Choice and Computers - HCC10 2012
  11. Fachtagung "Automatismen - Selbsttechnologien" 2011
  12. The U.S. Embassy School Election Project - Developing Competences of Democratic Culture in a TBLL Environment
  13. Organization Theory (Fachzeitschrift)
  14. Bedingungen erfolgreicher Implementation von Leseförderkonzepten in der Sekundarstufe I
  15. Doing Social Research with Artists (mit Vera Kockot)
  16. Online- and Video-Based Coaching During a Practicum: Effects on Students' Self-Efficacy and Perceived Competence Support
  17. The construction of national identity in ABC books and picturebooks from the 19th century to the present
  18. Unternehmerische Verantwortung: Engagement mit Strategie?
  19. Repräsentationen des Holocaust. Ein soziologischer Ansatz für eine vergleichende Analyse der Diskurese um das Shoa-Mehnmal in Wien und das Holocaust-Denkmal in Berlin
  20. Colombian coffee production: a local culture in a global market dynamic
  21. Fakultät W allgemein (Organisation)
  22. Ist im Osten alles anders? Parteiensysteme und Regierungsstabilität in den neuen EU-Staaten
  23. Social Entrepreneurship: Status Quo - 2009