When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany. / Koß, Michael.
In: Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Vol. 55, No. 1, 01.03.2025, p. 25-38.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{105c085a9c9e42bc8fe452dc06c62431,
title = "When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany",
abstract = "This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.",
keywords = "Politics, case study, donations, germany, ideational policy stabilisation, party funding, process-tracing analysis, qualitative content analysis",
author = "Michael Ko{\ss}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2024.",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/ipo.2023.31",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "25--38",
journal = "Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica",
issn = "0048-8402",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When (and how) ideas become arguments

T2 - the regulation of party donations in Germany

AU - Koß, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2024.

PY - 2025/3/1

Y1 - 2025/3/1

N2 - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

AB - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

KW - Politics

KW - case study

KW - donations

KW - germany

KW - ideational policy stabilisation

KW - party funding

KW - process-tracing analysis

KW - qualitative content analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008520472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

DO - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 55

SP - 25

EP - 38

JO - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

JF - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

SN - 0048-8402

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. No matter what the name, we’re all the same? Examining ethnic online discrimination in ridesharing marketplaces
  2. Egozentrierte Netzwerkanalysen
  3. Integration of Material Flow Management into Company Processes within the Automotive Industry
  4. Jazz in Czechoslovakia during the 1950s and 1960s
  5. Über die Liebe zur Musik
  6. The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon
  7. The significance of R&D Reporting as an element of Corporate Governance
  8. The World is Flat: Study Guide
  9. Heidegger reads Goethe. A polyphonic "Dialogue" (approx. 1910 to 1976)
  10. Texte evaluieren und für Sprache sensibilisieren
  11. The Rise and Fall of Electricity Distribution Cooperatives in Germany
  12. Toward industrial silicone 3D printing of soft robots
  13. In search of the Holy Grail of Rodent control
  14. The Environmentalitarian Situation
  15. Assessing the added value of the recent declaration on unregulated fishing for sustainable governance of the central Arctic Ocean
  16. The Importance of Business Continuity for Making Business: The Case of Design Kitchen
  17. Energy conservation attitudes and intentions
  18. Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from southern Africa
  19. Planning Table
  20. Prozess Simulation
  21. Promoting workers’ health in smalland medium-sized enterprises
  22. Composite extrusion of thin aluminum profiles with high reinforcing volume
  23. § 45 Reinhaltung von Küstengewässern
  24. Beyond Allyship
  25. Ausgewählte Kapitel der Theoretischen Informatik
  26. Cytotoxicity of the ga-containing coatings on biodegradable magnesium alloys
  27. Living on polluted soil