When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany. / Koß, Michael.
In: Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Vol. 2024, 31.01.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{105c085a9c9e42bc8fe452dc06c62431,
title = "When (and how) ideas become arguments: the regulation of party donations in Germany",
abstract = "This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.",
keywords = "Politics, case study, donations, germany, ideational policy stabilisation, party funding, process-tracing analysis, qualitative content analysis",
author = "Michael Ko{\ss}",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/ipo.2023.31",
language = "English",
volume = "2024",
journal = "Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica",
issn = "0048-8402",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When (and how) ideas become arguments

T2 - the regulation of party donations in Germany

AU - Koß, Michael

PY - 2024/1/31

Y1 - 2024/1/31

N2 - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

AB - This article aims to explain the deviant German case of an early and comprehensive regulation of party donations (combining a high level of transparency and incentives for small donations). Given the limited explanatory power of economic and institutional factors, the article emphasises the causal role of ideas for a policy stabilisation which occurred after 1993. A process-tracing analysis suggests that the 1983–1993 reform period was characterised by a conflict of ideas. During this conflict, ideas regarding undisclosed donations as an anti-democratic interference with democratic political competition came to prevail over ideas regarding all donations as a necessary condition for democratic competition irrespective of their regulation. The key actors in this conflict were, on the one hand, the new Green party which resuscitated the idea of donations being potentially anti-democratic and, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court which ultimately endorsed this ideational legacy promoted by the Greens. After 1993, donations in Germany came to be accepted as a necessary evil whose anti-democratic potential had to be limited by transparency obligations and incentives for small donations. The findings presented here suggest that policymakers need to link attempts to regulate party donations to ideational legacies (if available) to successfully tackle political corruption.

KW - Politics

KW - case study

KW - donations

KW - germany

KW - ideational policy stabilisation

KW - party funding

KW - process-tracing analysis

KW - qualitative content analysis

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica/article/when-and-how-ideas-become-arguments-the-regulation-of-party-donations-in-germany/1FD5F71F7D61FBBF8922BF221706B2EA#article

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/070bad51-49fb-315d-ad32-b0bdf3ba6b49/

U2 - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

DO - 10.1017/ipo.2023.31

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 2024

JO - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

JF - Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

SN - 0048-8402

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Tilman Spangenberg

Publications

  1. Einsam oder gemeinsam
  2. Magnesium alloys as implant materials-Principles of property design for Mg-RE alloys
  3. Executive Prerogatives in the Legislative Process and Democratic Stability
  4. Publikationsstrategien
  5. Versteigern statt Verschenken!
  6. "pathos"
  7. Peopling Europe through Data Practices
  8. The platform as factory
  9. The structure of contributing factors of human error in safety-critical industries
  10. Magnesium alloy containing silver for degradable biomedical implants
  11. Grenzenloses Wachstum in den Metropolen des Südens?
  12. "Inability to pay"
  13. Kunstraum of Lüneburg University
  14. Critical Stances
  15. Nachhaltigkeit
  16. Drivers of above-ground understorey biomass and nutrient stocks in temperate deciduous forests
  17. Does elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide affect internal nitrogen allocation in the temperate trees Alnus glutinosa and Pinus sylvestris?
  18. Methodenentwicklung zu Social Management
  19. An overview of biofuel policies across the world
  20. A Social Network Perspective on International Assignments:
  21. Zielablösezyklus
  22. Fast supercritical fluid extraction and high-resolution gas chromatography with electron-capture and flame photometric detection for multiresidue screening of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides in Brazil's medicinal plants
  23. Virtuous Play - Promoting Moral Sensitivity with Digital Games
  24. Promoting electric vehicles in Germany via subsidies – An efficient strategy?
  25. Diversitätsgerechte und digitale Lehre - Chance oder Widerspruch?
  26. Magnesium
  27. Correction to
  28. (Un)sichtbare Botschaften
  29. Identification of polybrominated debenzofurans from photolysis of decabromdiphenylether by uv spectroscopy
  30. Deciding whether to work after retirement
  31. Modelling ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurry in energy crop rotations