Tree cover mediates the effect on rapeseed leaf damage of excluding predatory arthropods, but in an unexpected way

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

Birds and predatory arthropods are often implicated in pest control, but their relative impact and how this is mediated by variation in tree cover requires elucidation. We excluded birds and ground predatory arthropods from rapeseed plants in 2.5. ×. 1. m plots in 26 homegardens in Ethiopia, leaving the same sized control plots. From six groups of plants in bird exclosure and control plots, respectively, three groups were excluded from ground predatory arthropods. Data on leaf damage were surveyed four times at weekly intervals. The tree cover and land-use composition within 100. ×. 100. m surrounding each plots were recorded in the field and from a satellite image within 200 and 500. m buffer zones. The results show that the mean leaf damage was higher on rapeseed plants from which predatory arthropods were excluded than on control plants. However, excluding birds had no or only a weak impact on leaf damage. The mean leaf damage within predatory arthropod exclosures decreased with increasing tree, forest and perennial cover but increased with increasing grazing land cover and annual crop cover, while on control plants it was low across the tree cover variation. This pattern may indicate the presence of a higher density of herbivores on rapeseed plants and also more predatory arthropods (i.e., to control them) in tree-poor homegardens compared to tree-rich homegardens. Hence, tree-poor homegardens in this landscape have sufficient habitat heterogeneity to support natural enemies to deliver significant pest control on rapeseed. Our results show that there was variation in the dynamics of pests and predatory arthropods across the tree cover variation, suggesting changes in landscape composition could affect the pest control services and the outcomes for local farmers.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Jahrgang211
Seiten (von - bis)57-64
Anzahl der Seiten8
ISSN0167-8809
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 15.12.2015

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Tormentil for active ulcerative colitis
  2. Conceptual Dimensions of Embodiment
  3. CDS spreads, systemic risk and interconnectedness
  4. How cognitive issue bracketing affects interdependent decision-making in negotiations
  5. Promoting physical activity in worksite settings
  6. A transfer operator based numerical investigation of coherent structures in three-dimensional Southern ocean circulation
  7. Sustainability performance measurement – a framework for context-specific applications
  8. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests
  9. Value struggles in the creative city
  10. Random walks on infinite self-similar graphs
  11. Small-scale soil patterns drive sharp boundaries between succulent "dwarf" biomes (or habitats) in the arid Succulent Karoo, South Africa
  12. Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
  13. Alignment of the life cycle initiative’s “principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment” with the LCSA practice
  14. Refunding ETS proceeds to spur the diffusion of renewable energies
  15. Payments for ecosystem services – for efficiency and for equity?
  16. The negative interplay between national custodial sanctions and leniency
  17. An integrative analysis of energy transitions in energy regions
  18. Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations
  19. Implementing education for sustainable development in the German school system
  20. Gottes Rhetorizität (oder Gott als Rhetor?)
  21. Normative Innovation for Sustainable Business Models in Value Networks
  22. Germany
  23. HyperUCB
  24. Freunde, Zeiger, Daten
  25. Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste
  26. § 29