The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. / Raymond, Christopher M.; Bieling, Claudia; Fagerholm, Nora et al.
in: Ambio, Jahrgang 45, Nr. 2, 01.03.2016, S. 173-184.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Raymond CM, Bieling C, Fagerholm N, Martin-Lopez B, Plieninger T. The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio. 2016 Mär 1;45(2):173-184. Epub 2015 Sep 7. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0

Bibtex

@article{9d85a204a464458a8646084152bbba8a,
title = "The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions",
abstract = "We develop a landscape stewardship classification which distinguishes between farmers{\textquoteright} understanding of landscape stewardship, their landscape values, and land management actions. Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with small-holder (<5 acres), medium-holders (5–100 acres), and large-holders (>100 acres) in South-West Devon, UK. Thematic analysis revealed four types of stewardship understandings: (1) an environmental frame which emphasized the farmers{\textquoteright} role in conserving or restoring wildlife; (2) a primary production frame which emphasized the farmers{\textquoteright} role in taking care of primary production assets; (3) a holistic frame focusing on farmers{\textquoteright} role as a conservationist, primary producer, and manager of a range of landscape values, and; (4) an instrumental frame focusing on the financial benefits associated with compliance with agri-environmental schemes. We compare the landscape values and land management actions that emerged across stewardship types, and discuss the global implications of the landscape stewardship classification for the engagement of farmers in landscape management.",
keywords = "Conservation behavior, Environmental management, Pro-environmental behavior, Production behavior, Social values, Sustainability Science, Conservation behavior, Social values, environmental management, Pro-environmental behavior, Production behavior",
author = "Raymond, {Christopher M.} and Claudia Bieling and Nora Fagerholm and Berta Martin-Lopez and Tobias Plieninger",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "173--184",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The farmer as a landscape steward

T2 - Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

AU - Bieling, Claudia

AU - Fagerholm, Nora

AU - Martin-Lopez, Berta

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - We develop a landscape stewardship classification which distinguishes between farmers’ understanding of landscape stewardship, their landscape values, and land management actions. Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with small-holder (<5 acres), medium-holders (5–100 acres), and large-holders (>100 acres) in South-West Devon, UK. Thematic analysis revealed four types of stewardship understandings: (1) an environmental frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in conserving or restoring wildlife; (2) a primary production frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in taking care of primary production assets; (3) a holistic frame focusing on farmers’ role as a conservationist, primary producer, and manager of a range of landscape values, and; (4) an instrumental frame focusing on the financial benefits associated with compliance with agri-environmental schemes. We compare the landscape values and land management actions that emerged across stewardship types, and discuss the global implications of the landscape stewardship classification for the engagement of farmers in landscape management.

AB - We develop a landscape stewardship classification which distinguishes between farmers’ understanding of landscape stewardship, their landscape values, and land management actions. Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with small-holder (<5 acres), medium-holders (5–100 acres), and large-holders (>100 acres) in South-West Devon, UK. Thematic analysis revealed four types of stewardship understandings: (1) an environmental frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in conserving or restoring wildlife; (2) a primary production frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in taking care of primary production assets; (3) a holistic frame focusing on farmers’ role as a conservationist, primary producer, and manager of a range of landscape values, and; (4) an instrumental frame focusing on the financial benefits associated with compliance with agri-environmental schemes. We compare the landscape values and land management actions that emerged across stewardship types, and discuss the global implications of the landscape stewardship classification for the engagement of farmers in landscape management.

KW - Conservation behavior

KW - Environmental management

KW - Pro-environmental behavior

KW - Production behavior

KW - Social values

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Conservation behavior

KW - Social values

KW - environmental management

KW - Pro-environmental behavior

KW - Production behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958110059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/749373e3-af5a-3709-a4b2-c33f27f3b186/

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0

DO - 10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 26346276

VL - 45

SP - 173

EP - 184

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. LEK – Längsschnittliche Erhebung pädagogischer Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden: Zusammenhangsstruktur der Konstrukte der beiden Tests des pädagogischen Wissens.
  2. 28th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association and 67th European Meeting of the Econometric Society - EEA 2013
  3. Förderung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Klassenführung von Lehramtsstudierenden durch online Videoanalyse und Expertenfeedback
  4. 41. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Ökologie - GfÖ 2011
  5. Aktuelle Urteile zum Korruptionsstrafrecht (§§ 299 a, b StGB)?
  6. Gesellschaft für Didaktik des Sachunterrichts Doktorand*innenarbeitstagung - GDSU 2015
  7. A Coding Scheme to Analyse Global Text Processing in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: What Eye Movements Can Tell Us
  8. Aufgabenbezogenes Aufmerksamkeitsverhalten von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf
  9. Professionalisierung weiterentwickeln heißt selbst professionell denken und handeln – Anforderungen an die Ausbildung
  10. Präventive Diagnostik in AAL-Umgebungen
  11. Projektentwicklung: Die kommunikative Konstruktion des sozialen Imaginären in Kunst und Alltag – untersucht am Beispiel des Konzeptes „Nachhaltigkeit“
  12. Fachgespräch „Vermeidung von Lebensmittelabfällen“, Bewertung, Maßnahmenvorschläge und Ansatzpunkte aus der Umweltperspektive, Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung
  13. First European-Latin American-Caribbean International Management Conference 2008
  14. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Fantastikforschung 2017
  15. Organisation des Symposiums "Phasen digital-gestützten individualisierten Übens im Fokus: Erkenntnisse aus dem CODIP-Projekt"
  16. Platform for Sustainable Aviation Fuels - Combining Ecological Research and Sustainability Management with Industrial Needs

Publikationen

  1. How to stay agile while growing: (re-)designing the IT landscape of a digital gazelle in the online marketing industry
  2. Distanzen von Lehrkräften und Studierenden des Sachunterrichts zur Physik
  3. "Et mundus hoc est homo" : Von einer sehr alten, nun wieder virtuellen Weltkarte
  4. Erfassung von Schülerselbsteinschätzungen zum schulbezogenen Sozial- und Lernverhalten
  5. Systemy nauczania je̜zyka niemieckiego w lektoratach DaF w Republice Federalnej Niemiec
  6. Co-kreatives Lehren und Lernen am Leuphana College
  7. Religiöse Sprachgebrauchsmuster: Das Beispiel Online-Trauer
  8. Herstellungskosten nach dem Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Besteuerungsverfahrens
  9. Corporate Environmental Accounting
  10. Die Energieversorgung in Deutschland und die Rolle der Steinkohle
  11. Energiewende als Gemeinschaftswerk? Stand und Perspektiven zur Einbindung der Jugend
  12. Nachhaltigkeit als Lerngegenstand zur Förderung von Mündigkeit im Kontext beruflichen Handelns
  13. Dialektik und philosophische Geschichtserzählung beim späten Schelling
  14. The role of semi‐open habitats as dispersal corridors for plant species of woodlands and open habitats
  15. The oil palm boom
  16. Mit Recht regieren? Zur Verrechtlichung transmigrantischer 24-Stunden- Carearbeit in österreichischen Privathaushalten
  17. Transdisziplinäre Bildungsforschung für nachhaltige Entwicklung
  18. Assessment of genetic diversity among seed transfer zones for multiple grassland plant species across Germany
  19. Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation
  20. Die Lüneburger Ziegelrohstoffe und ihre Bedeutung für die historische Ziegelproduktion
  21. Forschendes Lernen mit digitalen Medien – Ein Beitrag zur „Diklusion“
  22. Möglichkeiten der Optimierung einjähriger Blühstreifen für blütenbesuchende Insekten