Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation. / Kochskämper, Elisa; Koontz, Tomas M.; Newig, Jens.
in: Ecology and Society, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 1, 22, 03.2021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{fb9dfe4fd1d24b2d95ee81e9be209fa6,
title = "Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation",
abstract = "Adaptive management has been proliferating since the 1970s as a policy approach for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance through learning. Learning takes place through a cyclical approach of experimentation and (possible) adjustment. However, few empirical studies exist that cover full iterations of adaptive management cycles. We report on five adaptive management projects on water quality enhancement, of which four led to innovations in the small-scale management of waterways in northern Germany. We trace processes as well as outcomes, to identify factors affecting learning, environmental improvement, and the successful delivery of a project throughout a management cycle.Our findings point to a key difference between two kinds of uncertainty in the studied processes: ecological uncertainty (whether and how interventions will be effective in improving water quality) and what we term “social uncertainty” (how stakeholders will respond to interventions). We find that those managers performed better who addressed both kinds of uncertainty. Factors for dealing with social uncertainties were usually rather different than the ones linked to knowledge gain for the results in the rivers, and their acknowledgment was decisive for successful project delivery. On a conceptual level, our findings suggest that the model of a dual feedback cycle, including both types of uncertainties, allows for more clear-cut conceptual differentiation and empirical outcome measurement of adaptive management processes. ",
keywords = "Environmental Governance, comparative research, environmental governance, implementation, public participation, Water Framework Directive, comparative research, environmental governance, implementation, public participation, Water Framework Directive",
author = "Elisa Kochsk{\"a}mper and Koontz, {Tomas M.} and Jens Newig",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance.",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
doi = "10.5751/ES-12080-260122",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation

AU - Kochskämper, Elisa

AU - Koontz, Tomas M.

AU - Newig, Jens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance.

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - Adaptive management has been proliferating since the 1970s as a policy approach for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance through learning. Learning takes place through a cyclical approach of experimentation and (possible) adjustment. However, few empirical studies exist that cover full iterations of adaptive management cycles. We report on five adaptive management projects on water quality enhancement, of which four led to innovations in the small-scale management of waterways in northern Germany. We trace processes as well as outcomes, to identify factors affecting learning, environmental improvement, and the successful delivery of a project throughout a management cycle.Our findings point to a key difference between two kinds of uncertainty in the studied processes: ecological uncertainty (whether and how interventions will be effective in improving water quality) and what we term “social uncertainty” (how stakeholders will respond to interventions). We find that those managers performed better who addressed both kinds of uncertainty. Factors for dealing with social uncertainties were usually rather different than the ones linked to knowledge gain for the results in the rivers, and their acknowledgment was decisive for successful project delivery. On a conceptual level, our findings suggest that the model of a dual feedback cycle, including both types of uncertainties, allows for more clear-cut conceptual differentiation and empirical outcome measurement of adaptive management processes.

AB - Adaptive management has been proliferating since the 1970s as a policy approach for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance through learning. Learning takes place through a cyclical approach of experimentation and (possible) adjustment. However, few empirical studies exist that cover full iterations of adaptive management cycles. We report on five adaptive management projects on water quality enhancement, of which four led to innovations in the small-scale management of waterways in northern Germany. We trace processes as well as outcomes, to identify factors affecting learning, environmental improvement, and the successful delivery of a project throughout a management cycle.Our findings point to a key difference between two kinds of uncertainty in the studied processes: ecological uncertainty (whether and how interventions will be effective in improving water quality) and what we term “social uncertainty” (how stakeholders will respond to interventions). We find that those managers performed better who addressed both kinds of uncertainty. Factors for dealing with social uncertainties were usually rather different than the ones linked to knowledge gain for the results in the rivers, and their acknowledgment was decisive for successful project delivery. On a conceptual level, our findings suggest that the model of a dual feedback cycle, including both types of uncertainties, allows for more clear-cut conceptual differentiation and empirical outcome measurement of adaptive management processes.

KW - Environmental Governance

KW - comparative research

KW - environmental governance

KW - implementation

KW - public participation

KW - Water Framework Directive

KW - comparative research

KW - environmental governance

KW - implementation

KW - public participation

KW - Water Framework Directive

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104615025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/41f584f0-4234-3870-8170-194acd952766/

U2 - 10.5751/ES-12080-260122

DO - 10.5751/ES-12080-260122

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 26

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

M1 - 22

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Analysing money demand relation for OECD countries using common factors
  2. Predicting Effects of a Digital Stress Intervention for Patients With Depressive Symptoms
  3. Effective working hours and wages
  4. Challenges and opportunities in linking carbon sequestration, livelihoods and ecosystem service provision in drylands
  5. Dynamics of Supply Chains Under Mixed Production Strategies
  6. Mietmodell Software Adobe
  7. Feedback mit eigenen Augen
  8. Adaptive Lehrerinterventionen beim mathematischen Modellieren
  9. Control of geometry deviation by stiffness variation in polymer deep drawing tools
  10. Establishment age and wages
  11. Designing a model for the global energy system-GENeSYS-MOD
  12. An Experimental Study on Corrupt Actions
  13. Media use in Germany around the attacks in the United States
  14. Active suspensions decoupling by algebraic feedback
  15. Two-way NxP fertilisation experiment on barley (Hordeum vulgare) reveals shift from additive to synergistic N-P interactions at critical phosphorus fertilisation level
  16. You again Obsessive repeated Encounters in the Work of Rosamunde Pitcher and Leo Tolstoy
  17. A Reconsideration of the Perfect-Competition Model
  18. Differenz(en) im Inklusionskonzept
  19. Firm size and the use of export intermediaries.
  20. Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors for Track Applications
  21. Determinants and Management of Make-­and-Buy
  22. Warum Diderot?
  23. How many Persistent Organic Pollutants should we expect?
  24. A robust cascade sliding mode control for a hybrid piezo-hydraulic actuator in camless internal combustion engines
  25. Nanoindentation of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
  26. Transformative education
  27. Enforcement
  28. Contaminated sediment in Ramsar wetlands; A challenge towards sustainable management of sensitive ecosystems