Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. / Prümper, Jochen; Zapf, Dieter; Brodbeck, Felix C. et al.
in: Behaviour and Information Technology, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 6, 01.11.1992, S. 319-328.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Prümper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1992 Nov 1;11(6):319-328. doi: 10.1080/01449299208924353

Bibtex

@article{376e6a1ab046401a824707a170242f98,
title = "Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. {\textcopyright} 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Jochen Pr{\"u}mper and Dieter Zapf and Brodbeck, {Felix C.} and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01449299208924353",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "319--328",
journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
issn = "0144-929X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

AU - Prümper, Jochen

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/11/1

Y1 - 1992/11/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001009953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6c38db66-d228-3056-ba28-beff0962f4e9/

U2 - 10.1080/01449299208924353

DO - 10.1080/01449299208924353

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0001009953

VL - 11

SP - 319

EP - 328

JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

SN - 0144-929X

IS - 6

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. 25th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing
  2. Personal Initiative Training
  3. Lena Meyer-Bergner in Mexiko
  4. Co-creation in Open Strategy and Entrepreneurship
  5. The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational justice in the use of ecosystems and their services
  6. The Sources of Discursive Legitimation in International Organizations
  7. Tag der Hydrologie - TdH 2012
  8. World Resources Forum - WRF 2011
  9. 2013 5th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control - ICMIC 2013
  10. The hands that steer us: Notes from an ethnography of software developers
  11. Criteria and Strategies of Student Teachers to Deal with Teaching Material from the Internet about Refugees
  12. Simulation Project 2.0: Electing the U.S. President in a Web-Based EFL Scenario. Task, Processes Outcomes
  13. Into the weeds: the indirect effects of introduced plants
  14. KLANGSTÄRKE°18
  15. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RESIDUAL STRESS ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ON THE RESIDUAL STRESS AND FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH BEHAVIOUR IN AA7075
  16. Journal of Chromatographic Science (Zeitschrift)
  17. College (Organisation)
  18. Renewing Sustainability Thinking in Light of the Anthropocene: Exploring the Potentials of STS
  19. The COP24 Rulebook
  20. Processing Uncertainty. Timescapes in German Schools in the Context of Refugee Migration from Ukraine
  21. Perspectives on digital teaching and learning and AI in education I
  22. Lean Startup Risk Management
  23. Teach About US - Innovative Ways of Teaching English: The Election Project 2020
  24. Uncertain futures. The (Un-)Making of Certainty in German Schools in the Context of Refugee Migration from Ukraine