Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. / Prümper, Jochen; Zapf, Dieter; Brodbeck, Felix C. et al.
in: Behaviour and Information Technology, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 6, 01.11.1992, S. 319-328.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Prümper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1992 Nov 1;11(6):319-328. doi: 10.1080/01449299208924353

Bibtex

@article{376e6a1ab046401a824707a170242f98,
title = "Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. {\textcopyright} 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Jochen Pr{\"u}mper and Dieter Zapf and Brodbeck, {Felix C.} and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01449299208924353",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "319--328",
journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
issn = "0144-929X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

AU - Prümper, Jochen

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/11/1

Y1 - 1992/11/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001009953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6c38db66-d228-3056-ba28-beff0962f4e9/

U2 - 10.1080/01449299208924353

DO - 10.1080/01449299208924353

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0001009953

VL - 11

SP - 319

EP - 328

JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

SN - 0144-929X

IS - 6

ER -

DOI