Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. / Prümper, Jochen; Zapf, Dieter; Brodbeck, Felix C. et al.
In: Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.11.1992, p. 319-328.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Prümper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1992 Nov 1;11(6):319-328. doi: 10.1080/01449299208924353

Bibtex

@article{376e6a1ab046401a824707a170242f98,
title = "Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. {\textcopyright} 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Jochen Pr{\"u}mper and Dieter Zapf and Brodbeck, {Felix C.} and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01449299208924353",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "319--328",
journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
issn = "0144-929X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

AU - Prümper, Jochen

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/11/1

Y1 - 1992/11/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001009953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6c38db66-d228-3056-ba28-beff0962f4e9/

U2 - 10.1080/01449299208924353

DO - 10.1080/01449299208924353

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0001009953

VL - 11

SP - 319

EP - 328

JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

SN - 0144-929X

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second-Language Multimedia Learning Environment
  2. Improving Human-Machine Interaction
  3. Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory
  4. Crop rotation modelling
  5. Embedding Evidence on Conservation Interventions Within a Context of Multilevel Governance
  6. Governing Objects from a Distance
  7. Anwendungsprogrammierung mit Embedded-SQL
  8. Digital teaching as an instrument for cross-location teaching networks in medical informatics
  9. Sliding Mode Control for a Vertical Dynamics in the Presence of Nonlinear Friction
  10. Unveiling local knowledge
  11. Individual differences and cognitive load theory
  12. Navigating the dimensions of criticality
  13. Mapping Amazon's logistical footprint on the Ruhr
  14. Differentiating forest types using TerraSAR–X spotlight images based on inferential statistics and multivariate analysis
  15. Automated Measurement of Thread Quality
  16. Always on Call: Is There an Age Advantage in Dealing with Availability and Response Expectations?
  17. Increased Reliability of Draw-In Prediction in a Single Stage Deep-Drawing Operation via Transfer Learning
  18. Who can nudge for sustainable development? How nudge source renders dynamic norms (in-)effective in eliciting sustainable behavior
  19. Buckling Analysis under Uncertainty
  20. Applying Quarter-Vehicle Model Simulation for Road Elevation Measurements Utilizing the Vehicle Level Sensor
  21. Performance Saga: Interview 01
  22. Modern Baselines for SPARQL Semantic Parsing
  23. Development of a cell culture system for studying effects of native and photochemically transformed gaseous compounds using an air/liquid culture technique
  24. Steering of land use in the context of sustainable development
  25. Bifactor Models for Predicting Criteria by General and Specific Factors
  26. Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?
  27. RAWSim-O: A Simulation Framework for Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems
  28. Diversity Management and Corporate Change: Implications for Co-Determination
  29. Optimal control strategies for PMSM with a decoupling super twisting SMC and inductance estimation in the presence of saturation