Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. / Prümper, Jochen; Zapf, Dieter; Brodbeck, Felix C. et al.
In: Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.11.1992, p. 319-328.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Prümper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1992 Nov 1;11(6):319-328. doi: 10.1080/01449299208924353

Bibtex

@article{376e6a1ab046401a824707a170242f98,
title = "Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. {\textcopyright} 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Jochen Pr{\"u}mper and Dieter Zapf and Brodbeck, {Felix C.} and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01449299208924353",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "319--328",
journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
issn = "0144-929X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

AU - Prümper, Jochen

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/11/1

Y1 - 1992/11/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001009953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6c38db66-d228-3056-ba28-beff0962f4e9/

U2 - 10.1080/01449299208924353

DO - 10.1080/01449299208924353

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0001009953

VL - 11

SP - 319

EP - 328

JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

SN - 0144-929X

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Experimentally validated multi-step simulation strategy to predict the fatigue crack propagation rate in residual stress fields after laser shock peening
  2. Collaborative modelling for active involvement of stakeholders in urban flood risk management
  3. The effect of structural complexity on large mammal occurrence in revegetation
  4. Time Use Research and Time Use Data
  5. How to attract visitors with strategic, value-based experience design
  6. Telecoupling as a framework to support a more nuanced understanding of causality in land system science
  7. Does modality play a role? Visual-verbal cognitive style and multimedia learning
  8. Some results on output algebraic feedback with applications to mechanical systems
  9. The link between in- and external rotation of the auditor and the quality of financial accounting and external audit
  10. Biodiversity in space and time - towards a grid mapping for Mongolia
  11. Lexical markers of common grounds
  12. The global context and people at work: Special issue introduction
  13. Using Daily Stretching to Counteract Performance Decreases as a Result of Reduced Physical Activity—A Controlled Trial
  14. The Radius of Trust Problem Remains Resolved
  15. A four-component classification of uncertainties in biological invasions: implications for management
  16. Mapping industrial patterns in spatial agglomeration
  17. Reframing the technosphere
  18. Solvable problems or problematic solvability?
  19. Determinants of mandatory goodwill disclosure
  20. Theorizing the Role of Metaphors in Co-orienting Collective Action Toward Grand Challenges
  21. Long-term population dynamics of Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soo after abandonment and re-introduction of mowing
  22. Digital–sustainable co-transformation
  23. Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative
  24. A transdisciplinary evaluation framework for the assessment of integration in boundary-crossing collaborations in teacher education
  25. Process Analysis of Grounding Activities in Net-Based Cooperative Learning
  26. Adaptive Environments