Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. / Prümper, Jochen; Zapf, Dieter; Brodbeck, Felix C. et al.
In: Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.11.1992, p. 319-328.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Prümper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1992 Nov 1;11(6):319-328. doi: 10.1080/01449299208924353

Bibtex

@article{376e6a1ab046401a824707a170242f98,
title = "Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. {\textcopyright} 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Jochen Pr{\"u}mper and Dieter Zapf and Brodbeck, {Felix C.} and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01449299208924353",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "319--328",
journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
issn = "0144-929X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

AU - Prümper, Jochen

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/11/1

Y1 - 1992/11/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001009953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6c38db66-d228-3056-ba28-beff0962f4e9/

U2 - 10.1080/01449299208924353

DO - 10.1080/01449299208924353

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0001009953

VL - 11

SP - 319

EP - 328

JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

SN - 0144-929X

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Competence-Oriented Teaching
  2. Toward a lifespan metric of reading fluency
  3. Improving Human-Machine Interaction
  4. Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory
  5. The Making of MEZ - Multilingual Development:
  6. Digital teaching as an instrument for cross-location teaching networks in medical informatics
  7. John Howard Yoder
  8. Unveiling local knowledge
  9. Navigating the dimensions of criticality
  10. Automated Measurement of Thread Quality
  11. Always on Call: Is There an Age Advantage in Dealing with Availability and Response Expectations?
  12. The dynamics of prior entry in serial visual processing
  13. Knowledge transfer during the integration of knowledge-intensive acquisitions
  14. Buckling Analysis under Uncertainty
  15. Applying Quarter-Vehicle Model Simulation for Road Elevation Measurements Utilizing the Vehicle Level Sensor
  16. A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice
  17. Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?
  18. Hot forging of cast magnesium alloy TX31 using semi-closed die and its finite element simulation
  19. MICSIM: Concept, Developments, and Applications of a PC Microsimulation Model for Research and Teaching
  20. Effectiveness of a gratitude app at reducing repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic risk factor in the general population
  21. Land use affects dung beetle communities and their ecosystem service in forests and grasslands
  22. Temporal and thermodynamic irreversibility in production theory
  23. Investigation of the utilization of oat pomace and acid whey in technical scale succinic acid fermentation including downstream processing
  24. New incremental methods for springback compensation by stress superposition
  25. Introduction to the basics of life cycle sustainability assessment focusing on the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative LCSA framework
  26. Assessing mire-specific biodiversity with an indicator based approach
  27. The frame of the game
  28. Using machine learning to identify important predictors of COVID-19 infection prevention behaviors during the early phase of the pandemic
  29. The Influence of Adjustment Costs on Labour Adjustment: An Analysis Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Establishments in Lower Saxony
  30. Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands