Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. / Dee, Laura E.; Allesina, Stefano; Bonn, Aletta et al.
in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 2, 01.02.2017, S. 118-130.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

Dee, LE, Allesina, S, Bonn, A, Eklöf, A, Gaines, SD, Hines, J, Jacob, U, McDonald-Madden, E, Possingham, H, Schröter, M & Thompson, RM 2017, 'Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jg. 32, Nr. 2, S. 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

APA

Dee, L. E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S. D., Hines, J., Jacob, U., McDonald-Madden, E., Possingham, H., Schröter, M., & Thompson, R. M. (2017). Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

Vancouver

Dee LE, Allesina S, Bonn A, Eklöf A, Gaines SD, Hines J et al. Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2017 Feb 1;32(2):118-130. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

Bibtex

@article{ef89014ad6424f66ac0b1ef855b828c3,
title = "Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments",
abstract = "Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.",
keywords = "ecosystem services, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), natural resource management, network theory, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Dee, {Laura E.} and Stefano Allesina and Aletta Bonn and Anna Ekl{\"o}f and Gaines, {Steven D.} and Jes Hines and Ute Jacob and Eve McDonald-Madden and Hugh Possingham and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Thompson, {Ross M.}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "118--130",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments

AU - Dee, Laura E.

AU - Allesina, Stefano

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Eklöf, Anna

AU - Gaines, Steven D.

AU - Hines, Jes

AU - Jacob, Ute

AU - McDonald-Madden, Eve

AU - Possingham, Hugh

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Thompson, Ross M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.

AB - Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.

KW - ecosystem services

KW - Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

KW - natural resource management

KW - network theory

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006705708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 27856059

AN - SCOPUS:85006705708

VL - 32

SP - 118

EP - 130

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Marco Hofheinz

Publikationen

  1. Reducing Energy by a Factor of 10
  2. Microstructure and mechanical properties of large-scale Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloys prepared through semi-continuous casting
  3. Chapter 9: Particular Remedies for Non-performance: Section 3: Termination of Contract
  4. Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research
  5. Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations
  6. Chapter 9: Particular Remedies for Non-performance: Section 4: Price Reduction
  7. How data on transformation products can support the redesign of sulfonamides towards better biodegradability in the environment
  8. Existential Graphs as Ontographic Media
  9. Biological Computer Laboratory
  10. Experimental evidence for stronger cacao yield limitation by pollination than by plant resources
  11. Whose Change is it, Anyway?
  12. Collaboration or fragmentation?
  13. Erratum zu
  14. Chapter 9: Particular Remedies for Non-performance: Section 5: Damages and Interest
  15. Digital Classroom
  16. Entry, Exit and Productivity
  17. Introduction
  18. Ergebnisse einer Sparkassen-Umfrage
  19. Strategic Spatial Planning
  20. “Greedy Buyers, Amoral Speculators and Lacking State Control”
  21. Estimation of the cancer risk to humans resulting from the presence of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in surface water
  22. A multivariate, multilevel analysis of the relationship between cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement
  23. Impact of high carbon amendments and pre-crops on soil bacterial communities
  24. Development of a cycling anger scale
  25. One-year follow-up results of unsupported online computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care
  26. The research potential of new types of enterprise data based on surveys from official statistics in Germany
  27. Foucault, Reader and Critic of Marx
  28. QUANT - Question Answering Benchmark Curator
  29. VIPs in der Lesesozialisation ?
  30. Unplanned, Unanticipated and Unsupported?