Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. / Dee, Laura E.; Allesina, Stefano; Bonn, Aletta et al.
In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 118-130.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

Dee, LE, Allesina, S, Bonn, A, Eklöf, A, Gaines, SD, Hines, J, Jacob, U, McDonald-Madden, E, Possingham, H, Schröter, M & Thompson, RM 2017, 'Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

APA

Dee, L. E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S. D., Hines, J., Jacob, U., McDonald-Madden, E., Possingham, H., Schröter, M., & Thompson, R. M. (2017). Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

Vancouver

Dee LE, Allesina S, Bonn A, Eklöf A, Gaines SD, Hines J et al. Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2017 Feb 1;32(2):118-130. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

Bibtex

@article{ef89014ad6424f66ac0b1ef855b828c3,
title = "Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments",
abstract = "Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.",
keywords = "ecosystem services, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), natural resource management, network theory, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Dee, {Laura E.} and Stefano Allesina and Aletta Bonn and Anna Ekl{\"o}f and Gaines, {Steven D.} and Jes Hines and Ute Jacob and Eve McDonald-Madden and Hugh Possingham and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Thompson, {Ross M.}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "118--130",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments

AU - Dee, Laura E.

AU - Allesina, Stefano

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Eklöf, Anna

AU - Gaines, Steven D.

AU - Hines, Jes

AU - Jacob, Ute

AU - McDonald-Madden, Eve

AU - Possingham, Hugh

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Thompson, Ross M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.

AB - Managing ecosystems to provide ecosystem services in the face of global change is a pressing challenge for policy and science. Predicting how alternative management actions and changing future conditions will alter services is complicated by interactions among components in ecological and socioeconomic systems. Failure to understand those interactions can lead to detrimental outcomes from management decisions. Network theory that integrates ecological and socioeconomic systems may provide a path to meeting this challenge. While network theory offers promising approaches to examine ecosystem services, few studies have identified how to operationalize networks for managing and assessing diverse ecosystem services. We propose a framework for how to use networks to assess how drivers and management actions will directly and indirectly alter ecosystem services.

KW - ecosystem services

KW - Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

KW - natural resource management

KW - network theory

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006705708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 27856059

AN - SCOPUS:85006705708

VL - 32

SP - 118

EP - 130

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 2

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Mathematical Modelling of molecular adsorption in zeolite coated frequency domain sensors
  2. The role of learning strategies for performance in mathematics courses for engineers
  3. Developmentalities and donor-NGO relations
  4. Forging of cast Mg-3Sn-2Ca-0.4Al-0.4Si magnesium alloy using processing map
  5. Daily breath-based mindfulness exercises in a randomized controlled trial improve primary school children’s performance in arithmetic
  6. Smarte Anpassung von Presslinienparametern
  7. An inquiry into the digitisation of border and migration management
  8. A toolkit for robust risk assessment using F-divergences
  9. Biodegradability and genotoxicity of surface functionalized colloidal silica (SiO2) particles in the aquatic environment
  10. The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics
  11. Soziale Netzwerkanalyse
  12. A trainable object finder, selector and identifier for pollen, spores and other things
  13. Insights into creep behavior of Mg–14Gd–1Zn–0.4Zr (wt.%) alloy containing β- and γ-type precipitates
  14. Making REDD+ pay
  15. Geometric Properties on the Perfect Decoupling Disturbance Control in Manufacturing Systems
  16. The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas
  17. Allometric equations for maximum filtration rate in blue mussels Mytilus edulis and importance of condition index
  18. Accurate control of hyperbolic trajectories in any dimension
  19. DBLPLink 2.0 -- An Entity Linker for the DBLP Scholarly Knowledge Graph
  20. The challenges of gamifying CSR communication
  21. Influence of Dy in solid solution on the degradation behavior of binary Mg-Dy alloys in cell culture medium
  22. Microstructure by design
  23. Noticing Colour
  24. Emotion Perception in Human-Robot Interaction
  25. Self-Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth-Király, and Colosimo (2018)
  26. Correction to
  27. Efficacy of a Self-Help Web-Based Recovery Training in Improving Sleep in Workers