On the role of critique for science: A reply to Bao and Pöppel
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Kommentare / Debatten / Berichte › Forschung
Standard
in: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Jahrgang 37, Nr. 4, 05.2013, S. 723-725.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Kommentare / Debatten / Berichte › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the role of critique for science
T2 - A reply to Bao and Pöppel
AU - Martínez Mateo, M.
AU - Cabanis, Maurice
AU - Cruz de Echeverría Loebell, N.
AU - Krach, S.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Highlights► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
AB - Highlights► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
KW - Concept of science
KW - Cultural neurosciences
KW - Immanent critique
KW - Implications
KW - Philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876313722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.006
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.006
M3 - Comments / Debate / Reports
C2 - 23174651
AN - SCOPUS:84876313722
VL - 37
SP - 723
EP - 725
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
SN - 0149-7634
IS - 4
ER -