On the role of critique for science: A reply to Bao and Pöppel
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Kommentare / Debatten / Berichte › Forschung
Authors
Highlights
► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews |
| Jahrgang | 37 |
| Ausgabenummer | 4 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 723-725 |
| Anzahl der Seiten | 3 |
| ISSN | 0149-7634 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 05.2013 |
| Extern publiziert | Ja |
- Philosophie