TY - CHAP

T1 - Objects of Art after Duchamp

T2 - on creativity and gentrification

AU - Hui, Yuk

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - What is an artist? An artist is an exemplary figure of individuation — understood as process of psychic and collective individuation where a “I”is only inside of a “we”, and where a “we” is constituted at the same time by the saturated potential and strained by the preindividual backgroundthat it supposes….it is an operator of transindividuation of available preindividual: it creates the works, that is to say the artifacts…which typically open up the future as the undeterminedsingularity by an access to the repressed which contrives the power of the noeticsoul as its possibility — which is only by irregularity– of passing to acts. Bernard Stiegler Who envisions this image of evolutionary alternative, has a clear fundamental understanding of the SOCIAL SCULPTURE which is formed by MAN AS ARTIST. Who says that there must be a change, but instead skips over the “revolution of concept” and runs against the external manifestations of ideology will fail. He will either resign, or be content with reforms or end up in an impasse of terrorism. All three forms are the victoryof systems’ strategy. When it is finally asked: WHAT CAN WE DO? so that we can each the goal of the reorganization of the foundations, then we must make it clear:there is only one way [nonviolent transformation] to change the status quo– but these require a wide rangeof measures.

AB - What is an artist? An artist is an exemplary figure of individuation — understood as process of psychic and collective individuation where a “I”is only inside of a “we”, and where a “we” is constituted at the same time by the saturated potential and strained by the preindividual backgroundthat it supposes….it is an operator of transindividuation of available preindividual: it creates the works, that is to say the artifacts…which typically open up the future as the undeterminedsingularity by an access to the repressed which contrives the power of the noeticsoul as its possibility — which is only by irregularity– of passing to acts. Bernard Stiegler Who envisions this image of evolutionary alternative, has a clear fundamental understanding of the SOCIAL SCULPTURE which is formed by MAN AS ARTIST. Who says that there must be a change, but instead skips over the “revolution of concept” and runs against the external manifestations of ideology will fail. He will either resign, or be content with reforms or end up in an impasse of terrorism. All three forms are the victoryof systems’ strategy. When it is finally asked: WHAT CAN WE DO? so that we can each the goal of the reorganization of the foundations, then we must make it clear:there is only one way [nonviolent transformation] to change the status quo– but these require a wide rangeof measures.

KW - Cultural studies

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fdce3ca6-e455-39c1-aa54-34b14fb46b8f/

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SP - 171

EP - 179

BT - N.0 Critique Of Creative Reason

A2 - Vignola, Paolo

PB - La Deleuziana

CY - Italy

ER -