Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review. / Behm, David G.; Granacher, Urs; Warneke, Konstantin et al.
in: Sports Medicine, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 2, 02.2024, S. 289-302.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Behm DG, Granacher U, Warneke K, Aragão-Santos JC, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME, Konrad A. Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review. Sports Medicine. 2024 Feb;54(2):289-302. Epub 2023 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3

Bibtex

@article{62a82db46bb447d49f7cb9e631c94cd1,
title = "Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review",
abstract = "Background: Findings from original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have demonstrated the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) on markers of performance and health. However, the literature is inconsistent with regards to the dosage effects (frequency, intensity, time, type) of RT to maximize training-induced improvements. This is most likely due to moderating factors such as age, sex, and training status. Moreover, individuals with limited time to exercise or who lack motivation to perform RT are interested in the least amount of RT to improve physical fitness. Objectives: The objective of this review was to investigate and identify lower than typically recommended RT dosages (i.e., shorter durations, lower volumes, and intensity activities) that can improve fitness components such as muscle strength and endurance for sedentary individuals or beginners not meeting the minimal recommendation of exercise. Methods: Due to the broad research question involving different RT types, cohorts, and outcome measures (i.e., high heterogeneity), a narrative review was selected instead of a systematic meta-analysis approach. Results: It seems that one weekly RT session is sufficient to induce strength gains in RT beginners with < 3 sets and loads below 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). With regards to the number of repetitions, the literature is controversial and some authors report that repetition to failure is key to achieve optimal adaptations, while other authors report similar adaptations with fewer repetitions. Additionally, higher intensity or heavier loads tend to provide superior results. With regards to the RT type, multi-joint exercises induce similar or even larger effects than single-joint exercises. Conclusion: The least amount of RT that can be performed to improve physical fitness for beginners for at least the first 12 weeks is one weekly session at intensities below 50% 1RM, with < 3 sets per multi-joint exercise.",
keywords = "Physical education and sports",
author = "Behm, {David G.} and Urs Granacher and Konstantin Warneke and Arag{\~a}o-Santos, {Jose Carlos} and {Da Silva-Grigoletto}, {Marzo Edir} and Andreas Konrad",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "289--302",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimalist Training

T2 - Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review

AU - Behm, David G.

AU - Granacher, Urs

AU - Warneke, Konstantin

AU - Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos

AU - Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir

AU - Konrad, Andreas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2024/2

Y1 - 2024/2

N2 - Background: Findings from original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have demonstrated the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) on markers of performance and health. However, the literature is inconsistent with regards to the dosage effects (frequency, intensity, time, type) of RT to maximize training-induced improvements. This is most likely due to moderating factors such as age, sex, and training status. Moreover, individuals with limited time to exercise or who lack motivation to perform RT are interested in the least amount of RT to improve physical fitness. Objectives: The objective of this review was to investigate and identify lower than typically recommended RT dosages (i.e., shorter durations, lower volumes, and intensity activities) that can improve fitness components such as muscle strength and endurance for sedentary individuals or beginners not meeting the minimal recommendation of exercise. Methods: Due to the broad research question involving different RT types, cohorts, and outcome measures (i.e., high heterogeneity), a narrative review was selected instead of a systematic meta-analysis approach. Results: It seems that one weekly RT session is sufficient to induce strength gains in RT beginners with < 3 sets and loads below 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). With regards to the number of repetitions, the literature is controversial and some authors report that repetition to failure is key to achieve optimal adaptations, while other authors report similar adaptations with fewer repetitions. Additionally, higher intensity or heavier loads tend to provide superior results. With regards to the RT type, multi-joint exercises induce similar or even larger effects than single-joint exercises. Conclusion: The least amount of RT that can be performed to improve physical fitness for beginners for at least the first 12 weeks is one weekly session at intensities below 50% 1RM, with < 3 sets per multi-joint exercise.

AB - Background: Findings from original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have demonstrated the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) on markers of performance and health. However, the literature is inconsistent with regards to the dosage effects (frequency, intensity, time, type) of RT to maximize training-induced improvements. This is most likely due to moderating factors such as age, sex, and training status. Moreover, individuals with limited time to exercise or who lack motivation to perform RT are interested in the least amount of RT to improve physical fitness. Objectives: The objective of this review was to investigate and identify lower than typically recommended RT dosages (i.e., shorter durations, lower volumes, and intensity activities) that can improve fitness components such as muscle strength and endurance for sedentary individuals or beginners not meeting the minimal recommendation of exercise. Methods: Due to the broad research question involving different RT types, cohorts, and outcome measures (i.e., high heterogeneity), a narrative review was selected instead of a systematic meta-analysis approach. Results: It seems that one weekly RT session is sufficient to induce strength gains in RT beginners with < 3 sets and loads below 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). With regards to the number of repetitions, the literature is controversial and some authors report that repetition to failure is key to achieve optimal adaptations, while other authors report similar adaptations with fewer repetitions. Additionally, higher intensity or heavier loads tend to provide superior results. With regards to the RT type, multi-joint exercises induce similar or even larger effects than single-joint exercises. Conclusion: The least amount of RT that can be performed to improve physical fitness for beginners for at least the first 12 weeks is one weekly session at intensities below 50% 1RM, with < 3 sets per multi-joint exercise.

KW - Physical education and sports

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175728861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4911d561-6525-36fc-8bc2-532f855aae8d/

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3

DO - 10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 37924459

AN - SCOPUS:85175728861

VL - 54

SP - 289

EP - 302

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Does a smile open all doors? Understanding the impact of appearance disclosure on accommodation sharing platforms
  2. Christine Helmer: The trinity and Martin Luther
  3. Symbol Systems as Cognitive and Performative Hybrids
  4. We have Some Calves left! Socially Accepted Alternatives to the Current Handling of Male Calves from Dairy Production
  5. Protest 2.0 - Don't believe the Hype
  6. Der Markenwert
  7. A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship
  8. §50 Windenergie auf See
  9. Towards space traffic management
  10. Influence of cerium on stress corrosion cracking in AZ91D
  11. Kleinknecht, Alfred and Bain, Donald (eds.): New concepts in innovation output measurement, Basingstoke/London: Macmillan, 1993.204 pp. f 45.00. ISBN 0-333-58818-5
  12. Off-stage ecosystem service burdens
  13. Error Training
  14. Comparative Study of AC-DC Rectifiers for Vibration Energy Harvesters
  15. The Whiteness of Wealth Management
  16. Report on the First CELIS NOW Conference ‘The Age of Open Strategic Autonomy’
  17. Verschlafener Medienwandel
  18. Lesekompetenz heute
  19. „Der ganze Landkreis komplett in Aufruhr“
  20. Entwicklung und Qualitätssicherung von Anwendungssoftware
  21. Die Kolonialisierung der Vergangenheit
  22. The overburdened mother: How social workers view the private sphere
  23. After Occupy
  24. Loan managers’ trust and credit access for SMEs
  25. Roboter aus dem Silikondrucker
  26. Web-Based and Mobile Stress Management Intervention for Employees
  27. The Altmark Trans judgment: consequences for the hospital sector
  28. Staat und Gewissen. Ein Beitrag zum Grundrecht auf Kriegsdienstverweigerung
  29. Sustainability assessments designed for multiple functions
  30. Proletarische und bürgerliche Jünglinge in der Moderne
  31. Doing Gender – Doing Space – Doing Body
  32. Determinants in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Decisions—A Cross-Country Study