Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. / Genschow, Oliver; Van Den Bossche, Sofie; Cracco, Emiel et al.
in: PLoS ONE, Jahrgang 12, Nr. 9, e0183784, 06.09.2017.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Genschow, O, Van Den Bossche, S, Cracco, E, Bardi, L, Rigoni, D & Brass, M 2017, 'Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated', PLoS ONE, Jg. 12, Nr. 9, e0183784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183784

APA

Genschow, O., Van Den Bossche, S., Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017). Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS ONE, 12(9), Artikel e0183784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183784

Vancouver

Genschow O, Van Den Bossche S, Cracco E, Bardi L, Rigoni D, Brass M. Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS ONE. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784

Bibtex

@article{b37d3126be3e49bfbdbaf5ccfc50bd5a,
title = "Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated",
abstract = "It is widely known that individuals have a tendency to imitate each other. However, different psychological disciplines assess imitation in different manners. While social psychologists assess mimicry by means of action observation, cognitive psychologists assess automatic imitation with reaction time based measures on a trial-by-trial basis. Although these methods differ in crucial methodological aspects, both phenomena are assumed to rely on similar underlying mechanisms. This raises the fundamental question whether mimicry and automatic imitation are actually correlated. In the present research we assessed both phenomena and did not find a meaningful correlation. Moreover, personality traits such as empathy, autism traits, and traits related to self- versus other-focus did not correlate with mimicry or automatic imitation either. Theoretical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and {Van Den Bossche}, Sofie and Emiel Cracco and Lara Bardi and Davide Rigoni and Marcel Brass",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Genschow et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0183784",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Van Den Bossche, Sofie

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Bardi, Lara

AU - Rigoni, Davide

AU - Brass, Marcel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Genschow et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2017/9/6

Y1 - 2017/9/6

N2 - It is widely known that individuals have a tendency to imitate each other. However, different psychological disciplines assess imitation in different manners. While social psychologists assess mimicry by means of action observation, cognitive psychologists assess automatic imitation with reaction time based measures on a trial-by-trial basis. Although these methods differ in crucial methodological aspects, both phenomena are assumed to rely on similar underlying mechanisms. This raises the fundamental question whether mimicry and automatic imitation are actually correlated. In the present research we assessed both phenomena and did not find a meaningful correlation. Moreover, personality traits such as empathy, autism traits, and traits related to self- versus other-focus did not correlate with mimicry or automatic imitation either. Theoretical implications are discussed.

AB - It is widely known that individuals have a tendency to imitate each other. However, different psychological disciplines assess imitation in different manners. While social psychologists assess mimicry by means of action observation, cognitive psychologists assess automatic imitation with reaction time based measures on a trial-by-trial basis. Although these methods differ in crucial methodological aspects, both phenomena are assumed to rely on similar underlying mechanisms. This raises the fundamental question whether mimicry and automatic imitation are actually correlated. In the present research we assessed both phenomena and did not find a meaningful correlation. Moreover, personality traits such as empathy, autism traits, and traits related to self- versus other-focus did not correlate with mimicry or automatic imitation either. Theoretical implications are discussed.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028967353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28877197

AN - SCOPUS:85028967353

VL - 12

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 9

M1 - e0183784

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Tanja Neubüser

Publikationen

  1. Land Take and Soil Sealing—Drivers, Trends and Policy (Legal) Instruments
  2. (Re)Produktivität im Dialog mit der Praxis
  3. Challenging infrastructures of domestic labor
  4. Female Bodybuilding and Patriarchal Civilization. The Intrusion of a Practice in Sport into Artistic Fields and Visual Culture
  5. Karlsruher Postmoderne
  6. Modellierung und Erfassung von informell und non-formal erworbenen Kompetenzen
  7. Intersubjectivity and alterity in the works of Kant
  8. Teachers’ beliefs concerning teaching multilingual learners
  9. Beschreibung zentraler mathematischer Kompetenzen
  10. Staatsorganisation
  11. Feuilleton
  12. Mathe darstellend vernetzen
  13. Stress-Bewältigungs-Trainings
  14. Anleihekommunikation in der Unternehmenspraxis
  15. Tiergartentiere
  16. Biodegradable Magnesium Implants - How Do They Corrode in-vivo?
  17. Wertbeitrag des Human Resource Managements aus ökonomischer Sicht
  18. Self-selection into export markets by business services firms
  19. Multifunctional Agricultural Policies – Pathways towards Sustainable Rural Development?
  20. Sustainability Management Control
  21. Impact of sod-cutting and choppering on nutrient budgets of dry heathlands
  22. Pantomimisches Lernen in der Grundschule
  23. "Oh, You are a Scientist!" Elsa Glaser and Art History
  24. Diskussionsinhalte der 8. Hamburger Revisions-Tagung vom 14. und 15. September 2009
  25. The impact of long working hours on the health of German employees
  26. Erleben, Verstehen, Vergleichen
  27. Notting Hill Gate 3 Basic
  28. The Doctrines of Contract and Negotiorum Gestio in European Private Law: Quest for Structure in a No Man's Land of Legal Reasoning
  29. Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention im Setting Schule
  30. Quelques remarques sur les enjeux d'une confrontation entre Foucault et Marx
  31. Thesaurieren
  32. Between Risk, Beauty and the Sublime
  33. Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting
  34. Make EU trade with Brazil sustainable
  35. Dispositions of entrepreneurs: Exploring entrepreneurs’ personality characteristics
  36. Tausch, Technik, Krieg
  37. Le nouveau paradigme écologique

Presse / Medien

  1. Die Lust des Stattdessen