Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization : Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project . / Edenhofer, Ottmar; Lessmann, Kai; Kemfert, Claudia et al.

in: The Energy Journal, Jahrgang 27, Nr. SonderIssue 1-3, 01.09.2006, S. 57-108.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Edenhofer O, Lessmann K, Kemfert C, Grubb M, Köhler J. Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project . The Energy Journal. 2006 Sep 1;27(SonderIssue 1-3):57-108. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-3

Bibtex

@article{a3ea795de71f4012b55ec37c8b6e8122,
title = "Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project ",
abstract = "This paper summarizes results from ten global economy-energy-environment models implementing mechanisms of endogenous technological change (ETC). Climate policy goals represented as different CO2 stabilization levels are imposed, and the contribution of induced technological change (ITC) to meeting the goals is assessed. Findings indicate that climate policy induces additional technological change, in some models substantially. Its effect is a reduction of abatement costs in all participating models. The majority of models calculate abatement costs below 1 percent of present value aggregate gross world product for the period 2000-2100. The models predict different dynamics for rising carbon costs, with some showing a decline in carbon costs towards the end of the century. There are a number of reasons for differences in results between models; however four major drivers of differences are identified. First, the extent of the necessary CO2 reduction which depends mainly on predicted baseline emissions, determines how much a model is challenged to comply with climate policy. Second, when climate policy can offset market distortions, some models show that not costs but benefits accrue from climate policy. Third, assumptions about long-term investment behavior, e.g. foresight of actors and number of available investment options, exert a major influence. Finally, whether and how options for carbon-free energy are implemented (backstop and end-of-the-pipe technologies) strongly affects both the mitigation strategy and the abatement costs. ",
keywords = "Economics, Induced technological change, CO2 emissions reduction, Model classification, Model comparison",
author = "Ottmar Edenhofer and Kai Lessmann and Claudia Kemfert and Michael Grubb and Jonathan K{\"o}hler",
year = "2006",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-3",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "57--108",
journal = "The Energy Journal",
issn = "0195-6574",
publisher = "International Association for Energy Economics",
number = "SonderIssue 1-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization

T2 - Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project

AU - Edenhofer, Ottmar

AU - Lessmann, Kai

AU - Kemfert, Claudia

AU - Grubb, Michael

AU - Köhler, Jonathan

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - This paper summarizes results from ten global economy-energy-environment models implementing mechanisms of endogenous technological change (ETC). Climate policy goals represented as different CO2 stabilization levels are imposed, and the contribution of induced technological change (ITC) to meeting the goals is assessed. Findings indicate that climate policy induces additional technological change, in some models substantially. Its effect is a reduction of abatement costs in all participating models. The majority of models calculate abatement costs below 1 percent of present value aggregate gross world product for the period 2000-2100. The models predict different dynamics for rising carbon costs, with some showing a decline in carbon costs towards the end of the century. There are a number of reasons for differences in results between models; however four major drivers of differences are identified. First, the extent of the necessary CO2 reduction which depends mainly on predicted baseline emissions, determines how much a model is challenged to comply with climate policy. Second, when climate policy can offset market distortions, some models show that not costs but benefits accrue from climate policy. Third, assumptions about long-term investment behavior, e.g. foresight of actors and number of available investment options, exert a major influence. Finally, whether and how options for carbon-free energy are implemented (backstop and end-of-the-pipe technologies) strongly affects both the mitigation strategy and the abatement costs.

AB - This paper summarizes results from ten global economy-energy-environment models implementing mechanisms of endogenous technological change (ETC). Climate policy goals represented as different CO2 stabilization levels are imposed, and the contribution of induced technological change (ITC) to meeting the goals is assessed. Findings indicate that climate policy induces additional technological change, in some models substantially. Its effect is a reduction of abatement costs in all participating models. The majority of models calculate abatement costs below 1 percent of present value aggregate gross world product for the period 2000-2100. The models predict different dynamics for rising carbon costs, with some showing a decline in carbon costs towards the end of the century. There are a number of reasons for differences in results between models; however four major drivers of differences are identified. First, the extent of the necessary CO2 reduction which depends mainly on predicted baseline emissions, determines how much a model is challenged to comply with climate policy. Second, when climate policy can offset market distortions, some models show that not costs but benefits accrue from climate policy. Third, assumptions about long-term investment behavior, e.g. foresight of actors and number of available investment options, exert a major influence. Finally, whether and how options for carbon-free energy are implemented (backstop and end-of-the-pipe technologies) strongly affects both the mitigation strategy and the abatement costs.

KW - Economics

KW - Induced technological change

KW - CO2 emissions reduction

KW - Model classification

KW - Model comparison

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/931d1abb-432a-3f14-8ffc-57bad8559ede/

U2 - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-3

DO - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-3

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 27

SP - 57

EP - 108

JO - The Energy Journal

JF - The Energy Journal

SN - 0195-6574

IS - SonderIssue 1-3

ER -