Giving is a question of time: response times and contributions to an environmental public good

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Giving is a question of time: response times and contributions to an environmental public good. / Lohse, Johannes; Goeschl, Timo; Diederich, Johannes H.
in: Environmental and Resource Economics, Jahrgang 67, 2017, S. 455-477.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e409059c71764ffa9fe6e43eab47c1c7,
title = "Giving is a question of time: response times and contributions to an environmental public good",
abstract = "Does it matter whether contribution decisions regarding environmental publicgoods are arrived at through intuition or reflection? Experimental research in behavioral economics has recently adopted dual-system theories of the mind from psychology in order to address this question. This research uses response time data in public good games to distinguish between the two distinct cognitive processes. We extend this literature towards environmental public goods by analyzing response time data from an online experiment inwhich over 3400 subjects from the general population faced a dichotomous choice between receiving a monetary payment or contributing to climate change mitigation efforts. Our evidence confirms a strong positive link between response times and contributions: The average response time of contributors is 40% higher than that of non-contributors. This suggests that reflection, not intuition, is at the root of pro-environmental contributions. This result is robust to a comprehensive set of robustness checks, including a within-subjects analysis that controls for potentially unobserved confounds and recovers the relationship at the individual level.",
keywords = "Public goods, Cooperation, Dual-system theories, Response times, Climate change, Online experiment, Economics",
author = "Johannes Lohse and Timo Goeschl and Diederich, {Johannes H.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10640-016-0029-z",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "455--477",
journal = "Environmental and Resource Economics",
issn = "0924-6460",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving is a question of time: response times and contributions to an environmental public good

AU - Lohse, Johannes

AU - Goeschl, Timo

AU - Diederich, Johannes H.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Does it matter whether contribution decisions regarding environmental publicgoods are arrived at through intuition or reflection? Experimental research in behavioral economics has recently adopted dual-system theories of the mind from psychology in order to address this question. This research uses response time data in public good games to distinguish between the two distinct cognitive processes. We extend this literature towards environmental public goods by analyzing response time data from an online experiment inwhich over 3400 subjects from the general population faced a dichotomous choice between receiving a monetary payment or contributing to climate change mitigation efforts. Our evidence confirms a strong positive link between response times and contributions: The average response time of contributors is 40% higher than that of non-contributors. This suggests that reflection, not intuition, is at the root of pro-environmental contributions. This result is robust to a comprehensive set of robustness checks, including a within-subjects analysis that controls for potentially unobserved confounds and recovers the relationship at the individual level.

AB - Does it matter whether contribution decisions regarding environmental publicgoods are arrived at through intuition or reflection? Experimental research in behavioral economics has recently adopted dual-system theories of the mind from psychology in order to address this question. This research uses response time data in public good games to distinguish between the two distinct cognitive processes. We extend this literature towards environmental public goods by analyzing response time data from an online experiment inwhich over 3400 subjects from the general population faced a dichotomous choice between receiving a monetary payment or contributing to climate change mitigation efforts. Our evidence confirms a strong positive link between response times and contributions: The average response time of contributors is 40% higher than that of non-contributors. This suggests that reflection, not intuition, is at the root of pro-environmental contributions. This result is robust to a comprehensive set of robustness checks, including a within-subjects analysis that controls for potentially unobserved confounds and recovers the relationship at the individual level.

KW - Public goods

KW - Cooperation

KW - Dual-system theories

KW - Response times

KW - Climate change

KW - Online experiment

KW - Economics

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-016-0029-z

DO - 10.1007/s10640-016-0029-z

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 67

SP - 455

EP - 477

JO - Environmental and Resource Economics

JF - Environmental and Resource Economics

SN - 0924-6460

ER -

DOI