Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria. / Zemp, Stefan; Stauffacher, Michael; Lang, Daniel et al.
in: Transport Policy, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 2, 03.2011, S. 446-455.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{360928d5c5754bcd8f552cfdfbd99ef2,
title = "Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria",
abstract = "The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.",
keywords = "Environmental planning, Functions , Stakeholders, Common system understanding , Assessment, Railway station, Systemic perspective , Assessment, Common system understanding, Functions, Railway station, Stakeholders, Systemic perspective",
author = "Stefan Zemp and Michael Stauffacher and Daniel Lang and Scholz, {Roland W.}",
year = "2011",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "446--455",
journal = "Transport Policy",
issn = "0967-070X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic functions of railway stations

T2 - A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria

AU - Zemp, Stefan

AU - Stauffacher, Michael

AU - Lang, Daniel

AU - Scholz, Roland W.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.

AB - The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.

KW - Environmental planning

KW - Functions

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Common system understanding

KW - Assessment

KW - Railway station

KW - Systemic perspective

KW - Assessment

KW - Common system understanding

KW - Functions

KW - Railway station

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Systemic perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251635672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8bcc4467-5bf3-34a1-93a5-4902b29092a7/

U2 - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 18

SP - 446

EP - 455

JO - Transport Policy

JF - Transport Policy

SN - 0967-070X

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Ines Carstensen

Publikationen

  1. Technology Development and Stakeholder Influence
  2. Models for integrated production-inventory systems
  3. Microstructure and corrosion of AZ91 with small amounts of cerium
  4. Sprache
  5. Working the Digital Humanities
  6. Influence of processing route on the properties of magnesium alloys
  7. Labs in the real world
  8. Implementierung eines Fehlerpräventionsprogramms für gefahrenintensive Arbeitsprozesse
  9. Mehrsprachige Lehramtsstudierende schreiben
  10. Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information
  11. The Boundary Objects Concept: Theorizing Film and Media.
  12. After Occupy
  13. Scaffolding im Rahmen von Inquiry-based Learning.
  14. Introduction
  15. Performancemanagement in Projekten durch Earned Value Management (EVM)
  16. The role of knowledge and information in innovation
  17. Abnormal extrusion texture and reversed yield asymmetry in a Mg–Y-Sm-Zn-Zr alloy
  18. Frustrated and helpless - sources and consequences of students’ negative deactivating emotions in university mathematics
  19. Cascaded Backstepping Control for a Permanent Magnet Linear Motor using a Dual Kalman Filter
  20. Zwischen Assimilation und Multikultur
  21. BP’s Solar Business Model - A Case Study on BP’s Solar Business Case and its Drivers
  22. Investigation of minimum creep rates and stress exponents calculated from tensile and compressive creep data of magnesium alloy AE42
  23. Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) 2021
  24. „Beach Soccer“
  25. Milchbubirechnung
  26. Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies
  27. Plant functional traits and community assembly along interacting gradients of productivity and fragmentation
  28. Computer Support for Environmental Management Accounting
  29. Nucleation mechanism of Mg17Al12-precipitates in binary Mg-7 wt.% Al alloy