Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria. / Zemp, Stefan; Stauffacher, Michael; Lang, Daniel et al.
In: Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 446-455.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{360928d5c5754bcd8f552cfdfbd99ef2,
title = "Generic functions of railway stations: A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria",
abstract = "The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.",
keywords = "Environmental planning, Functions , Stakeholders, Common system understanding , Assessment, Railway station, Systemic perspective , Assessment, Common system understanding, Functions, Railway station, Stakeholders, Systemic perspective",
author = "Stefan Zemp and Michael Stauffacher and Daniel Lang and Scholz, {Roland W.}",
year = "2011",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "446--455",
journal = "Transport Policy",
issn = "0967-070X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic functions of railway stations

T2 - A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria

AU - Zemp, Stefan

AU - Stauffacher, Michael

AU - Lang, Daniel

AU - Scholz, Roland W.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.

AB - The redevelopment of railway stations calls for the integration of many different objectives. Two crucial challenges thereby are the development of a common system understanding among the multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and the structured definition of comprehensiveassessment criteria. Defining the functions of the system railway station, i.e. discussing what the system should do, can support solving these challenges. Based on a review of Swiss railway stations in a transdisciplinary research project applying four focus groups (n¼38), 28 expert interviews and twoexpert workshops, we present a structured framework of five generic functions of railway stations and their interdependencies. The five generic functions are: linking catchment area and transport network, supporting transfer between modes of transport, facilitating commercial use of real estate, providingpublic space, and contributing to the identity of the surrounding area. Potential conflicts between functions are identified. They concern the competition of multiple functions for space, for customer attention or for revenues as well as increasing system complexities with station size. We illustrate how the framework of functions can be used to foster a common system understanding and to develop assessment criteria. Although elaborated from a Swiss perspective the framework is perceived adaptable to railway stations of other countries.

KW - Environmental planning

KW - Functions

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Common system understanding

KW - Assessment

KW - Railway station

KW - Systemic perspective

KW - Assessment

KW - Common system understanding

KW - Functions

KW - Railway station

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Systemic perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251635672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8bcc4467-5bf3-34a1-93a5-4902b29092a7/

U2 - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 18

SP - 446

EP - 455

JO - Transport Policy

JF - Transport Policy

SN - 0967-070X

IS - 2

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Bsc-Thesis: Vertical stratification of ant community composition along a forest succession gradient in subtropical China.
  2. Interactions between social movements and international organisations
  3. A Hermeneutic Interpretation of Concepts in a Cooperative Multicultural Working Project
  4. Comparative Perspectives on Social Values and Modernization - 2011
  5. College (Organisation)
  6. 15th International Conference on Sensors and Measurement Technology - SENSOR 2011
  7. Reactivity on a student-centered recording system – a video-based longitudinal study in primary education
  8. Measuring the Quality of Democracies - 2011
  9. Mental representations of art field globalization
  10. 1st conference of the COST Action IS0906 "Transforming Audiences, Transforming Societies" - COST ISO0906 2011
  11. Walter de Gruyter (Verlag)
  12. Optimization of solid phase extraction of Beta-blockers from hospital effluent by Response Surface Methodology
  13. After Progress
  14. Teach About US - Innovative Ways of Teaching English: The Election Project 2020
  15. Kinderliterarisches Übersetzen
  16. Children’s Literature in Language Teaching 2004
  17. 2. KLIFF-Statusseminar - 2011
  18. Imaginative Resilience: Beyond Climate Fatalism and Cruel Eco Optimism
  19. Swets & Zeitglinger (Verlag)
  20. Villanova University
  21. Exploring corporate reality of sustainability accounting practices
  22. Another End of the World is Possible: Beyond Climate Fatalism and Cruel Eco-Optimism
  23. Conference „Managing the way out of the crisis: between regulation and forecasts“ 2011
  24. Fakultät W allgemein (Organisation)
  25. Große Transformation zur klimaverträglichen Gesellschaft 2011
  26. Emerging Researchers on Videos in Teacher Education - Structured Video Talk [Konferenz abgesagt]
  27. Creativity and Innovation Management (Zeitschrift)
  28. Stiftungsrat (Organisation)
  29. Science slam: a new approach of popular science communication
  30. Conference of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics - DS11 SIAM 2011