Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. / Cristea, Ioana A.; Kok, Robin N.; Cuijpers, Pim.
in: The British Journal of Psychiatry, Jahrgang 206, Nr. 1, 01.01.2015, S. 7-16.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 1;206(1):7-16. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761

Bibtex

@article{373f189797244bfeaf1280bfd7b1c405,
title = "Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background Cognitive bias modification (CBM) interventions are strongly advocated in research and clinical practice.Aims To examine the efficiency of CBM for clinically relevant outcomes, along with study quality, publication bias and potential moderators.Method We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBM interventions that reported clinically relevant outcomes assessed with standardised instruments.Results We identified 49 trials and grouped outcomes into anxiety and depression. Effect sizes were small considering all the samples, and mostly non-significant for patient samples. Effect sizes became non-significant when outliers were excluded and after adjustment for publication bias. The quality of the RCTs was suboptimal.Conclusions CBM may have small effects on mental health problems, but it is also very well possible that there are no significant clinically relevant effects. Research in this field is hampered by small and low-quality trials, and by risk of publication bias. Many positive outcomes are driven by extreme outliers.",
keywords = "Psychology, anxiety disorder, clinical effectiveness, cognitive bias, cognitive therapy, depression, psychosocial care",
author = "Cristea, {Ioana A.} and Kok, {Robin N.} and Pim Cuijpers",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761",
language = "English",
volume = "206",
pages = "7--16",
journal = "The British Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0007-1250",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression

T2 - meta-analysis

AU - Cristea, Ioana A.

AU - Kok, Robin N.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background Cognitive bias modification (CBM) interventions are strongly advocated in research and clinical practice.Aims To examine the efficiency of CBM for clinically relevant outcomes, along with study quality, publication bias and potential moderators.Method We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBM interventions that reported clinically relevant outcomes assessed with standardised instruments.Results We identified 49 trials and grouped outcomes into anxiety and depression. Effect sizes were small considering all the samples, and mostly non-significant for patient samples. Effect sizes became non-significant when outliers were excluded and after adjustment for publication bias. The quality of the RCTs was suboptimal.Conclusions CBM may have small effects on mental health problems, but it is also very well possible that there are no significant clinically relevant effects. Research in this field is hampered by small and low-quality trials, and by risk of publication bias. Many positive outcomes are driven by extreme outliers.

AB - Background Cognitive bias modification (CBM) interventions are strongly advocated in research and clinical practice.Aims To examine the efficiency of CBM for clinically relevant outcomes, along with study quality, publication bias and potential moderators.Method We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBM interventions that reported clinically relevant outcomes assessed with standardised instruments.Results We identified 49 trials and grouped outcomes into anxiety and depression. Effect sizes were small considering all the samples, and mostly non-significant for patient samples. Effect sizes became non-significant when outliers were excluded and after adjustment for publication bias. The quality of the RCTs was suboptimal.Conclusions CBM may have small effects on mental health problems, but it is also very well possible that there are no significant clinically relevant effects. Research in this field is hampered by small and low-quality trials, and by risk of publication bias. Many positive outcomes are driven by extreme outliers.

KW - Psychology

KW - anxiety disorder

KW - clinical effectiveness

KW - cognitive bias

KW - cognitive therapy

KW - depression

KW - psychosocial care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920398422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761

DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 25561486

VL - 206

SP - 7

EP - 16

JO - The British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - The British Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0007-1250

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Dorit Gräbnitz

Publikationen

  1. Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online- and video-based intervention study
  2. Forest-specific diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens
  3. Local organochlorine pesticide concentrations in soil put into a global perspective
  4. Cyberspace Battleground
  5. Spurred Emulation
  6. Isolation Playground
  7. Transdisziplinäre Integration in der Universität
  8. EU-Prüferreform „light“?!
  9. Transnational labour solidarity
  10. Die Herausforderung der Migration
  11. Multilevel Party Politics during the Grand Coalition
  12. Multi-Level Governance in Universities
  13. Fedeli alla linea "Getreu der Linie mit Marx" neu beginnen
  14. Der europäische Weg
  15. Einführung in die Ästhetische Bildung
  16. Exkursion in die Coy-Galaxis
  17. Anpassung oder Widerstand?
  18. Ästhetische Erziehung
  19. Escape. Computerspiele als Kulturtechnik
  20. The Publics Behind Political Web Campaigning
  21. Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals
  22. The reputation costs of executive misconduct accusations
  23. CoLab
  24. Comfortable Time Headways in Adaptive Cruise Control:
  25. Angst and unsustainability in postmodern times
  26. Der Unort von Karten und das Nirgendwo der Kunst
  27. Aufgaben 2.0
  28. Migration Struggles and the Global Justice Movement
  29. Mechanismen der Veränderung von Organisationen
  30. Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung und Diffusion
  31. Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices
  32. Vernarrt in die Soziologie
  33. Adaptation knowledge for New Zealand's primary industries: Known, not known and needed
  34. Spent mushroom substrate and sawdust to produce mycelium-based thermal insulation composites
  35. Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness
  36. The WTO’s Crisis