Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore. / Checco, Julia; Demont, Matty; Coote, Leonard V. et al.
in: Food Quality and Preference, Jahrgang 137, 105812, 03.2026.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Checco J, Demont M, Coote LV, Schulze M, Permani R, Muflikh YN et al. Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore. Food Quality and Preference. 2026 Mär;137:105812. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105812

Bibtex

@article{929d450208a24065b2bbadaf2c1c719a,
title = "Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore",
abstract = "Multidimensional labels have emerged as a potential solution to the proliferation of multi-labelling in the food industry, which often leads to consumer confusion and scepticism. This study examines the performance of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) multidimensional label compared to single-issue labels (Organic, Fairtrade, and World Wildlife Fund) and origin attributes in the rice market. We assessed SRP's potential to replace or complement existing labelling systems using a discrete choice experiment with 507 German and 361 Singaporean rice consumers, measuring willingness to pay for rice with different label combinations. Results indicate that while SRP's familiarity and trust lagged most established single-issue labels in both markets, its performance varied by market context. In Singapore's unsaturated label market, SRP outperformed single-issue labels and origin, whereas in Germany's saturated market, familiar labels like Fairtrade, Organic or EU origin surpassed SRP. Partial substitution effects occurred when SRP was combined with Organic in both markets, but SRP cannot fully replace the Organic label. Complementary effects emerged when SRP was combined with trustworthy single-issue labels or favourable origin labels. Importantly, multi-labelling with Organic, Fairtrade and WWF labels outperformed the SRP label by almost double in Singapore and triple in Germany, suggesting consumers value multiple simple certifications over a single, complex multidimensional label. These findings contribute to existing literature on multidimensional and multi-labelling scheme effectiveness, revealing market-specific consumer preferences. The results have significant implications for sustainable labelling strategies in the rice industry and can guide policymakers and food companies in developing more effective sustainability communication approaches.",
keywords = "Discrete choice experiment, Organic, Rice, Sustainability labels, Sustainable rice platform, Willingness to pay, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Julia Checco and Matty Demont and Coote, {Leonard V.} and Maureen Schulze and Risti Permani and Muflikh, {Yanti Nuraeni} and Jaquie Mitchell and Aziz, {Ammar Abdul}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2026",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105812",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore

AU - Checco, Julia

AU - Demont, Matty

AU - Coote, Leonard V.

AU - Schulze, Maureen

AU - Permani, Risti

AU - Muflikh, Yanti Nuraeni

AU - Mitchell, Jaquie

AU - Aziz, Ammar Abdul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2026/3

Y1 - 2026/3

N2 - Multidimensional labels have emerged as a potential solution to the proliferation of multi-labelling in the food industry, which often leads to consumer confusion and scepticism. This study examines the performance of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) multidimensional label compared to single-issue labels (Organic, Fairtrade, and World Wildlife Fund) and origin attributes in the rice market. We assessed SRP's potential to replace or complement existing labelling systems using a discrete choice experiment with 507 German and 361 Singaporean rice consumers, measuring willingness to pay for rice with different label combinations. Results indicate that while SRP's familiarity and trust lagged most established single-issue labels in both markets, its performance varied by market context. In Singapore's unsaturated label market, SRP outperformed single-issue labels and origin, whereas in Germany's saturated market, familiar labels like Fairtrade, Organic or EU origin surpassed SRP. Partial substitution effects occurred when SRP was combined with Organic in both markets, but SRP cannot fully replace the Organic label. Complementary effects emerged when SRP was combined with trustworthy single-issue labels or favourable origin labels. Importantly, multi-labelling with Organic, Fairtrade and WWF labels outperformed the SRP label by almost double in Singapore and triple in Germany, suggesting consumers value multiple simple certifications over a single, complex multidimensional label. These findings contribute to existing literature on multidimensional and multi-labelling scheme effectiveness, revealing market-specific consumer preferences. The results have significant implications for sustainable labelling strategies in the rice industry and can guide policymakers and food companies in developing more effective sustainability communication approaches.

AB - Multidimensional labels have emerged as a potential solution to the proliferation of multi-labelling in the food industry, which often leads to consumer confusion and scepticism. This study examines the performance of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) multidimensional label compared to single-issue labels (Organic, Fairtrade, and World Wildlife Fund) and origin attributes in the rice market. We assessed SRP's potential to replace or complement existing labelling systems using a discrete choice experiment with 507 German and 361 Singaporean rice consumers, measuring willingness to pay for rice with different label combinations. Results indicate that while SRP's familiarity and trust lagged most established single-issue labels in both markets, its performance varied by market context. In Singapore's unsaturated label market, SRP outperformed single-issue labels and origin, whereas in Germany's saturated market, familiar labels like Fairtrade, Organic or EU origin surpassed SRP. Partial substitution effects occurred when SRP was combined with Organic in both markets, but SRP cannot fully replace the Organic label. Complementary effects emerged when SRP was combined with trustworthy single-issue labels or favourable origin labels. Importantly, multi-labelling with Organic, Fairtrade and WWF labels outperformed the SRP label by almost double in Singapore and triple in Germany, suggesting consumers value multiple simple certifications over a single, complex multidimensional label. These findings contribute to existing literature on multidimensional and multi-labelling scheme effectiveness, revealing market-specific consumer preferences. The results have significant implications for sustainable labelling strategies in the rice industry and can guide policymakers and food companies in developing more effective sustainability communication approaches.

KW - Discrete choice experiment

KW - Organic

KW - Rice

KW - Sustainability labels

KW - Sustainable rice platform

KW - Willingness to pay

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105023306854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105812

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105812

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105023306854

VL - 137

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

M1 - 105812

ER -

DOI