Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Ambio, Jahrgang 49, Nr. 5, 01.05.2020, S. 1100-1113.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals
AU - Schröter, Matthias
AU - Kraemer, Roland
AU - Remme, Roy P.
AU - van Oudenhoven, Alexander P.E.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.
AB - Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.
KW - Biodiversity conservation
KW - Ecosystem service flows
KW - Service-providing species
KW - Sustainability
KW - Telecoupling
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073960605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e2cdeea3-2451-3109-b30b-cd2267eb2c20/
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3
DO - 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 31552645
AN - SCOPUS:85073960605
VL - 49
SP - 1100
EP - 1113
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
SN - 0044-7447
IS - 5
ER -