Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals. / Schröter, Matthias; Kraemer, Roland; Remme, Roy P. et al.
in: Ambio, Jahrgang 49, Nr. 5, 01.05.2020, S. 1100-1113.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schröter M, Kraemer R, Remme RP, van Oudenhoven APE. Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals. Ambio. 2020 Mai 1;49(5):1100-1113. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3

Bibtex

@article{f6a8841dfa17473c875f89cfc7b29f87,
title = "Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals",
abstract = "Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.",
keywords = "Biodiversity conservation, Ecosystem service flows, Service-providing species, Sustainability, Telecoupling, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Roland Kraemer and Remme, {Roy P.} and {van Oudenhoven}, {Alexander P.E.}",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1100--1113",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Kraemer, Roland

AU - Remme, Roy P.

AU - van Oudenhoven, Alexander P.E.

PY - 2020/5/1

Y1 - 2020/5/1

N2 - Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.

AB - Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Ecosystem service flows

KW - Service-providing species

KW - Sustainability

KW - Telecoupling

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073960605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e2cdeea3-2451-3109-b30b-cd2267eb2c20/

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3

DO - 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 31552645

AN - SCOPUS:85073960605

VL - 49

SP - 1100

EP - 1113

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 5

ER -

DOI