Standard
Context in natural-language communication: presupposed or co-supposed? /
Fetzer, Anita.
Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001 Dundee, UK, July 27–30, 2001 Proceedings. Hrsg. / Varol Akman; Paolo Bouquet; Richmond Thomason; Roger A. Young. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer, 2001. S. 449-452 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Band 2116).
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Konferenzbänden › Forschung
Harvard
Fetzer, A 2001,
Context in natural-language communication: presupposed or co-supposed? in V Akman, P Bouquet, R Thomason & RA Young (Hrsg.),
Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001 Dundee, UK, July 27–30, 2001 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Bd. 2116, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, S. 449-452, 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context - 2001, Dundee, Großbritannien / Vereinigtes Königreich,
27.07.01.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
APA
Fetzer, A. (2001).
Context in natural-language communication: presupposed or co-supposed? In V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R. Thomason, & R. A. Young (Hrsg.),
Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001 Dundee, UK, July 27–30, 2001 Proceedings (S. 449-452). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Band 2116). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
Vancouver
Fetzer A.
Context in natural-language communication: presupposed or co-supposed? in Akman V, Bouquet P, Thomason R, Young RA, Hrsg., Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001 Dundee, UK, July 27–30, 2001 Proceedings. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. 2001. S. 449-452. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). doi: 10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
Bibtex
@inbook{23252cdf489b47d39470446579b75fcd,
title = "Context in natural-language communication: presupposed or co-supposed?",
abstract = "The role of context is investigated in natural-language communication by differentiating between cognitive, linguistic and social contexts. It is firmly anchored to a dialogue framework and based on a relational conception of context as structured and interactionally organised. It adopts bottom-up and top-down perspectives and argues for natural-language communication as a dialogical, cooperative and collaborative endeavour, in which local meaning is negotiated in context. In the case of an acceptance, an utterance and its presuppositions are allocated to the dialogue common ground and assigned the status of co-suppositions. In the case of a non-acceptance, a negotiation-of-validity sequence is initiated. The adaptation of both micro and macro perspectives requires a differentiation between unilateral speech acts and collective dialogue acts, individual I-intentions and collective WE-intentions, individual presuppositions and collective co-suppositions, and individual sensemaking and collective coherence.",
keywords = "English, Communicative Intention, Communicative project, indexical expression, communicative contribution, local meaning",
author = "Anita Fetzer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001.; 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context - 2001 ; Conference date: 27-07-2001 Through 30-07-2001",
year = "2001",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-540-42379-9",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "449--452",
editor = "Varol Akman and Paolo Bouquet and Richmond Thomason and Young, {Roger A.}",
booktitle = "Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings",
address = "Germany",
url = "http://context19.disi.unitn.it/index.php/context-conferences-and-journal/",
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Context in natural-language communication
T2 - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context - 2001
AU - Fetzer, Anita
N1 - Conference code: 3
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - The role of context is investigated in natural-language communication by differentiating between cognitive, linguistic and social contexts. It is firmly anchored to a dialogue framework and based on a relational conception of context as structured and interactionally organised. It adopts bottom-up and top-down perspectives and argues for natural-language communication as a dialogical, cooperative and collaborative endeavour, in which local meaning is negotiated in context. In the case of an acceptance, an utterance and its presuppositions are allocated to the dialogue common ground and assigned the status of co-suppositions. In the case of a non-acceptance, a negotiation-of-validity sequence is initiated. The adaptation of both micro and macro perspectives requires a differentiation between unilateral speech acts and collective dialogue acts, individual I-intentions and collective WE-intentions, individual presuppositions and collective co-suppositions, and individual sensemaking and collective coherence.
AB - The role of context is investigated in natural-language communication by differentiating between cognitive, linguistic and social contexts. It is firmly anchored to a dialogue framework and based on a relational conception of context as structured and interactionally organised. It adopts bottom-up and top-down perspectives and argues for natural-language communication as a dialogical, cooperative and collaborative endeavour, in which local meaning is negotiated in context. In the case of an acceptance, an utterance and its presuppositions are allocated to the dialogue common ground and assigned the status of co-suppositions. In the case of a non-acceptance, a negotiation-of-validity sequence is initiated. The adaptation of both micro and macro perspectives requires a differentiation between unilateral speech acts and collective dialogue acts, individual I-intentions and collective WE-intentions, individual presuppositions and collective co-suppositions, and individual sensemaking and collective coherence.
KW - English
KW - Communicative Intention
KW - Communicative project
KW - indexical expression
KW - communicative contribution
KW - local meaning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942873168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e90ca295-bc08-3570-affd-b86b2626233b/
U2 - 10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
DO - 10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
M3 - Article in conference proceedings
SN - 978-3-540-42379-9
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 449
EP - 452
BT - Modeling and Using Context - 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2001, Proceedings
A2 - Akman, Varol
A2 - Bouquet, Paolo
A2 - Thomason, Richmond
A2 - Young, Roger A.
PB - Springer
CY - Heidelberg, Berlin
Y2 - 27 July 2001 through 30 July 2001
ER -
