Bridging scenario planning and backcasting: A Q-analysis of divergent stakeholder priorities for future landscapes

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Bridging scenario planning and backcasting: A Q-analysis of divergent stakeholder priorities for future landscapes. / Jiren, Tolera Senbeto; Abson, David James; Schultner, Jannik et al.
in: People and Nature, Jahrgang 5, Nr. 2, 04.2023, S. 572-590.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{37d0f9de00f34ad4bcae974e2d7a3e50,
title = "Bridging scenario planning and backcasting: A Q-analysis of divergent stakeholder priorities for future landscapes",
abstract = "Many landscapes in sub-Saharan Africa have undergone rapid changes, often with negative social and ecological impacts. Avoiding (or reversing) such negative impacts requires proactive landscape planning. Scenario planning, a participatory approach that generates narratives of plausible landscape change trajectories in the future, has been widely used to support landscape planning and decisions. However, not least because of challenges arising from group dynamics, few examples exist where backcasting—the collective envisioning of a desirable future landscape and the identification of pathways to reach that future—has been applied in landscape planning. In this study, building on past scenario planning work in southwestern Ethiopia, we begin to fill this empirical and methodological gap. Specifically, we used the Q-methodology to elucidate stakeholders' divergent landscape aspirations in a case study in southwestern Ethiopia. Our results show that many stakeholders share a similar vision of building a future landscape that supports smallholder-based development. However, details in the envisaged pathways differ between stakeholders. Three distinct pathways were prioritized by different stakeholders: (1) Agroecological production, (2) Coffee investment and (3) Intensive food crop production. Accounting for these divergent aspirations is important when taking further steps in landscape planning. We show how using the Q-methodology as a subjective assessment of stakeholders' landscape priorities can facilitate the integration of backcasting within the normative process of landscape planning. Our approach thus helps navigate conflicting stakeholders' preferences and based on that, carefully plan collective action towards a shared landscape vision. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.",
keywords = "backcasting, landscape, Q-methodology, scenario, stakeholder, visioning, Environmental planning, Environmental Governance",
author = "Jiren, {Tolera Senbeto} and Abson, {David James} and Jannik Schultner and Maraja Riechers and J{\"o}rn Fischer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1002/pan3.10441",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "572--590",
journal = "People and Nature",
issn = "2575-8314",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging scenario planning and backcasting

T2 - A Q-analysis of divergent stakeholder priorities for future landscapes

AU - Jiren, Tolera Senbeto

AU - Abson, David James

AU - Schultner, Jannik

AU - Riechers, Maraja

AU - Fischer, Jörn

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - Many landscapes in sub-Saharan Africa have undergone rapid changes, often with negative social and ecological impacts. Avoiding (or reversing) such negative impacts requires proactive landscape planning. Scenario planning, a participatory approach that generates narratives of plausible landscape change trajectories in the future, has been widely used to support landscape planning and decisions. However, not least because of challenges arising from group dynamics, few examples exist where backcasting—the collective envisioning of a desirable future landscape and the identification of pathways to reach that future—has been applied in landscape planning. In this study, building on past scenario planning work in southwestern Ethiopia, we begin to fill this empirical and methodological gap. Specifically, we used the Q-methodology to elucidate stakeholders' divergent landscape aspirations in a case study in southwestern Ethiopia. Our results show that many stakeholders share a similar vision of building a future landscape that supports smallholder-based development. However, details in the envisaged pathways differ between stakeholders. Three distinct pathways were prioritized by different stakeholders: (1) Agroecological production, (2) Coffee investment and (3) Intensive food crop production. Accounting for these divergent aspirations is important when taking further steps in landscape planning. We show how using the Q-methodology as a subjective assessment of stakeholders' landscape priorities can facilitate the integration of backcasting within the normative process of landscape planning. Our approach thus helps navigate conflicting stakeholders' preferences and based on that, carefully plan collective action towards a shared landscape vision. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

AB - Many landscapes in sub-Saharan Africa have undergone rapid changes, often with negative social and ecological impacts. Avoiding (or reversing) such negative impacts requires proactive landscape planning. Scenario planning, a participatory approach that generates narratives of plausible landscape change trajectories in the future, has been widely used to support landscape planning and decisions. However, not least because of challenges arising from group dynamics, few examples exist where backcasting—the collective envisioning of a desirable future landscape and the identification of pathways to reach that future—has been applied in landscape planning. In this study, building on past scenario planning work in southwestern Ethiopia, we begin to fill this empirical and methodological gap. Specifically, we used the Q-methodology to elucidate stakeholders' divergent landscape aspirations in a case study in southwestern Ethiopia. Our results show that many stakeholders share a similar vision of building a future landscape that supports smallholder-based development. However, details in the envisaged pathways differ between stakeholders. Three distinct pathways were prioritized by different stakeholders: (1) Agroecological production, (2) Coffee investment and (3) Intensive food crop production. Accounting for these divergent aspirations is important when taking further steps in landscape planning. We show how using the Q-methodology as a subjective assessment of stakeholders' landscape priorities can facilitate the integration of backcasting within the normative process of landscape planning. Our approach thus helps navigate conflicting stakeholders' preferences and based on that, carefully plan collective action towards a shared landscape vision. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

KW - backcasting

KW - landscape

KW - Q-methodology

KW - scenario

KW - stakeholder

KW - visioning

KW - Environmental planning

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147293827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/713cb270-7031-3854-91ed-296f25c83cb8/

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10441

DO - 10.1002/pan3.10441

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85147293827

VL - 5

SP - 572

EP - 590

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Case Study
  2. Punitive Damages
  3. Primed Goals and Primed Actions
  4. Discrimination at work: Effects on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. An empirical study of the influence of perceived discrimination on work-related behaviours among people with and without a migration background
  5. Leverage points for improving gender equality and human well-being in a smallholder farming context
  6. Georeferencing System for Maneuvering of Autonomous Truck in Mining Environment
  7. From Pity to Control
  8. Combining mechanics and electrostatics
  9. Studien zu einer Ethik der Enttäuschung
  10. Self-determined or non-self-determined? Exploring consumer motivation for sustainable food choices
  11. EEZ-adjacent distant-water fishing as a global security challenge
  12. Innovation bazaar
  13. Counts of all walks as atomic and molecular descriptors.
  14. Sustainability Reporting as a Consequence of Environmental Orientation
  15. A high power dye laser pumped by a crowbar mode flashlamp
  16. Independent Music and Digital Technology in the Philippines
  17. Personalisation as currency
  18. Modernization
  19. Advancing Decision-Visualization Environments—Empirically informed Design Recommendations
  20. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics
  21. Design of a Real Time Path of Motion Control for Manufacturing Applications
  22. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options
  23. Processes for green and sustainable software engineering
  24. Effect of laser peening process parameters and sequences on residual stress profiles
  25. Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization
  26. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  27. Microstructural pattern formation in finite-deformation single-slip crystal plasticity under cyclic loading
  28. SHEstainability
  29. Virtualität und Interaktivität
  30. Effects of microbial processes on the performance of a ReSponge™ zero valent iron PRB
  31. Mythos als Aufklärung