Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices. / Brüll, Anja; Bohemen, Hein van; Costanza, Robert et al.
in: Procedia Environmental Sciences, Jahrgang 9, 2011, S. 16-20.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Brüll, A., Bohemen, H. V., Costanza, R., & Mitsch, W. J. (2011). Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 9, 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.004

Vancouver

Brüll A, Bohemen HV, Costanza R, Mitsch WJ. Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2011;9:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.004

Bibtex

@article{7825ed96928344c09b6b8031abd5b233,
title = "Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices",
abstract = "With the intention to further promote the field of ecological engineering and the solutions it provides, a workshop on “Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices” was held 3 Dec 2009. It was conducted by the International Ecological Engineering Society in Paris at the conference “Ecological Engineering: from Concepts to Application” organized by the Ecological Engineering Applications Group GAIE. This paper presents the results of the workshop related to three key questions: (1) what are the benefits of ecological engineering practices to human and ecosystem well-being, (2) which concepts are used or useful to identify, reference, and measure the benefits of ecological engineering practices, and (3) how and to whom shall benefits of ecological engineering practices be promoted. While benefits of ecological engineering practices are diverse, general conclusions can be derived to facilitate communication. Identifying benefits requires valuation frameworks reaching beyond the scope of ecology and engineering. A distinction between human and ecosystem well-being in this regard may not be easy or useful, but instead humans embedded in ecosystems should be addressed as a whole. The concepts of resource efficiency, ecosystem services, ecosystem health, and multifunctional land use could serve as suitable references to frame ecological engineering benefits, as well as referring to international political goals such as biodiversity protection, climate change mitigation and poverty reduction. Sector and application specific criteria of good practice could be worked out. Regional, area specific reference systems for sustainable development could provide comparative advantages for ecologically engineered solutions. Besides people with high decision making power and people with high motivation for change are good target groups to be addressed.",
keywords = "Environmental planning, benefits, ecological engineering, ecosystem services, mulitfunctional landscape",
author = "Anja Br{\"u}ll and Bohemen, {Hein van} and Robert Costanza and Mitsch, {William J.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "16--20",
journal = "Procedia Environmental Sciences",
issn = "1878-0296",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices

AU - Brüll, Anja

AU - Bohemen, Hein van

AU - Costanza, Robert

AU - Mitsch, William J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - With the intention to further promote the field of ecological engineering and the solutions it provides, a workshop on “Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices” was held 3 Dec 2009. It was conducted by the International Ecological Engineering Society in Paris at the conference “Ecological Engineering: from Concepts to Application” organized by the Ecological Engineering Applications Group GAIE. This paper presents the results of the workshop related to three key questions: (1) what are the benefits of ecological engineering practices to human and ecosystem well-being, (2) which concepts are used or useful to identify, reference, and measure the benefits of ecological engineering practices, and (3) how and to whom shall benefits of ecological engineering practices be promoted. While benefits of ecological engineering practices are diverse, general conclusions can be derived to facilitate communication. Identifying benefits requires valuation frameworks reaching beyond the scope of ecology and engineering. A distinction between human and ecosystem well-being in this regard may not be easy or useful, but instead humans embedded in ecosystems should be addressed as a whole. The concepts of resource efficiency, ecosystem services, ecosystem health, and multifunctional land use could serve as suitable references to frame ecological engineering benefits, as well as referring to international political goals such as biodiversity protection, climate change mitigation and poverty reduction. Sector and application specific criteria of good practice could be worked out. Regional, area specific reference systems for sustainable development could provide comparative advantages for ecologically engineered solutions. Besides people with high decision making power and people with high motivation for change are good target groups to be addressed.

AB - With the intention to further promote the field of ecological engineering and the solutions it provides, a workshop on “Benefits of Ecological Engineering Practices” was held 3 Dec 2009. It was conducted by the International Ecological Engineering Society in Paris at the conference “Ecological Engineering: from Concepts to Application” organized by the Ecological Engineering Applications Group GAIE. This paper presents the results of the workshop related to three key questions: (1) what are the benefits of ecological engineering practices to human and ecosystem well-being, (2) which concepts are used or useful to identify, reference, and measure the benefits of ecological engineering practices, and (3) how and to whom shall benefits of ecological engineering practices be promoted. While benefits of ecological engineering practices are diverse, general conclusions can be derived to facilitate communication. Identifying benefits requires valuation frameworks reaching beyond the scope of ecology and engineering. A distinction between human and ecosystem well-being in this regard may not be easy or useful, but instead humans embedded in ecosystems should be addressed as a whole. The concepts of resource efficiency, ecosystem services, ecosystem health, and multifunctional land use could serve as suitable references to frame ecological engineering benefits, as well as referring to international political goals such as biodiversity protection, climate change mitigation and poverty reduction. Sector and application specific criteria of good practice could be worked out. Regional, area specific reference systems for sustainable development could provide comparative advantages for ecologically engineered solutions. Besides people with high decision making power and people with high motivation for change are good target groups to be addressed.

KW - Environmental planning

KW - benefits

KW - ecological engineering

KW - ecosystem services

KW - mulitfunctional landscape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857416754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.004

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 9

SP - 16

EP - 20

JO - Procedia Environmental Sciences

JF - Procedia Environmental Sciences

SN - 1878-0296

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Die Predigten von Plötzensee
  2. Zur Weiterveräußerung gebrauchter Softwarelizenzen ("UsedSoft II")
  3. Interpunktionszeichen der Geschichte; Leichen
  4. Valuation approaches for soil carbon
  5. Verfassungsrechtliche Vertiefung: Neue Ansätze zur Regulierung der Windenergie
  6. Aspekte sozialer Nachhaltigkeit im Kontext der beruflichen Bildung Benachteiligter
  7. Hoffnung auf Normalität. Normalitätskonstruktionen in inklusionsbezogenen Hoffnungsbildern
  8. Environmental assessment in Tsunami-affected Andaman Islands, INDIA
  9. Die Sustainability Balanced Scorecard als Integrationsrahmen für BUIS
  10. On Freedom, Power, Justice
  11. The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement
  12. Sacred Protest
  13. Blended-Learning Brückenkurs Mathematik für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler.
  14. Kritik der Anerkennung von Vielfalt in der Pädagogik und dem was wir nicht nicht wollen können
  15. The economic insurance value of ecosystem resilience
  16. Climate change, conservation and management: an assessment of the peer-reviewed scientific journal literature
  17. Robust estimates of exporter productivity premia in German business services enterprises
  18. Vasodilatierende Substanzen in Kläranlagenabläufen und Oberflächengewässern
  19. Idiome: Die kleinen ks der Kunst
  20. Vergewaltigung
  21. Aus Wörtern werden Texte
  22. „Dan Flavin” / “Ilya Kabakov” / “Urs Fischer”
  23. Chronological investigations of pleistocene interglacial, glacial and aeolian deposits from Schöningen (Germany) using post-IR IRSL dating and pollen analysis
  24. Psychological approaches to entrepreneurship
  25. Zeit nachhaltig gestalten lernen
  26. The regulation of zero-price markets by the competition authorities in the USA and the EU
  27. Eine alternative Einstiegsvorlesung in die Fachmathematik – Konzept und Auswirkungen
  28. Lebenszyklen touristischer Destinationen
  29. Führung von Silver Workern