Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. / Wittmayer, Julia M.; Schäpke, Niko.
in: Sustainability Science, Jahrgang 9, Nr. 4, 24.10.2014, S. 483-496.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{23d958746eac47b3b64424f7283f96e8,
title = "Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions",
abstract = "In sustainability science, the tension between more descriptive–analytical and more process-oriented approaches is receiving increasing attention. The latter entails a number of roles for researchers, which have largely been neglected in the literature. Based on the rich tradition of action research and on a specific process-oriented approach to sustainability transitions (transition management), we establish an in-depth understanding of the activities and roles of researchers. This is done by specifying ideal-type roles that researchers take when dealing with key issues in creating and maintaining space for societal learning—a core activity in process-oriented approaches. These roles are change agent, knowledge broker, reflective scientist, self-reflexive scientist and process facilitator. To better understand these ideal-type roles, we use them as a heuristic to explore a case of transition management in Rotterdam. In the analysis, we discuss the implications of this set of ideal-type roles for the self-reflexivity of researchers, role conflicts and potentials, and for the changing role of the researcher and of science in general.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Action research, Process-oriented sustainability science, Roles of researchers, Transdisciplinarity, transition management, Action research, Process-oriented sustainability science, Roles of researchers, Transdisciplinarity, Transition management",
author = "Wittmayer, {Julia M.} and Niko Sch{\"a}pke",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "483--496",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Action, research and participation

T2 - roles of researchers in sustainability transitions

AU - Wittmayer, Julia M.

AU - Schäpke, Niko

PY - 2014/10/24

Y1 - 2014/10/24

N2 - In sustainability science, the tension between more descriptive–analytical and more process-oriented approaches is receiving increasing attention. The latter entails a number of roles for researchers, which have largely been neglected in the literature. Based on the rich tradition of action research and on a specific process-oriented approach to sustainability transitions (transition management), we establish an in-depth understanding of the activities and roles of researchers. This is done by specifying ideal-type roles that researchers take when dealing with key issues in creating and maintaining space for societal learning—a core activity in process-oriented approaches. These roles are change agent, knowledge broker, reflective scientist, self-reflexive scientist and process facilitator. To better understand these ideal-type roles, we use them as a heuristic to explore a case of transition management in Rotterdam. In the analysis, we discuss the implications of this set of ideal-type roles for the self-reflexivity of researchers, role conflicts and potentials, and for the changing role of the researcher and of science in general.

AB - In sustainability science, the tension between more descriptive–analytical and more process-oriented approaches is receiving increasing attention. The latter entails a number of roles for researchers, which have largely been neglected in the literature. Based on the rich tradition of action research and on a specific process-oriented approach to sustainability transitions (transition management), we establish an in-depth understanding of the activities and roles of researchers. This is done by specifying ideal-type roles that researchers take when dealing with key issues in creating and maintaining space for societal learning—a core activity in process-oriented approaches. These roles are change agent, knowledge broker, reflective scientist, self-reflexive scientist and process facilitator. To better understand these ideal-type roles, we use them as a heuristic to explore a case of transition management in Rotterdam. In the analysis, we discuss the implications of this set of ideal-type roles for the self-reflexivity of researchers, role conflicts and potentials, and for the changing role of the researcher and of science in general.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Action research

KW - Process-oriented sustainability science

KW - Roles of researchers

KW - Transdisciplinarity

KW - transition management

KW - Action research

KW - Process-oriented sustainability science

KW - Roles of researchers

KW - Transdisciplinarity

KW - Transition management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910005455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4

DO - 10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 9

SP - 483

EP - 496

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Self-directed racialized humor as in-group marker among migrant players in a professional football team
  2. Moral Sensitivity as a Precondition of Moral Distress
  3. Herausforderungen des kulturellen Wandels in Richtung Nachhaltigkeit
  4. Interieur
  5. The Contribution of Fisheries Access Agreements to the Emergence of the Exclusive Economic Zone
  6. The Changing Role of Business in Global Society
  7. Schätzung des Projektfortschritts bei Fertigungsaufträgen nach IFRS
  8. Nicolai Hartmanns Neue Ontologie und die Philosophische Anthropologie
  9. Statistische Auswertungsverfahren nominalskalierter Daten
  10. Die Qual der Wahl
  11. Ein Smartphone-gestütztes internetbasiertes Programm für Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 und komorbider Depression
  12. Kommentierung von: Art. 340 AEUV
  13. Nachhaltig transformativ?
  14. Tunesische Transformationen
  15. Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
  16. Nachhaltigkeit managen mit der Balanced Scorecard
  17. The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements.
  18. Frühzeitige Identifizierung des Qualifikationsbedarfes für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung und Gestaltung von Berufsprofilen
  19. Reply to Maier et al., Szaszi et al., and Bakdash and Marusich
  20. The influence of empowering leadership on repatriate knowledge transfer
  21. Verhalten des Zytostatikums Epirubicin-Hydrochlorid in der aquatischen Umwelt
  22. Rechtsmissbrauch durch Prozessfinanzierung bei Gewinnabschöpfungsklage
  23. GRAMSCI CON FOUCAULT FILOSOFIA DELLA PRASSI COME ANALISI STRATEGICA
  24. Auctionning biodiversity conservation contracts
  25. Auswirkungen der Wärmespeicherung auf die Mikroflora in Aquiferen.
  26. Formen teilhabender Kritik
  27. Consumer Contracts and European Community Law
  28. § 287 Verantwortlichkeit während des Verzugs