A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition. / Upham, Paul; Johansen, Katinka.
in: Energy Research and Social Science, Jahrgang 66, 101489, 01.08.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d7a4db74f4534c02bd44a852949cd53e,
title = "A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition",
abstract = "The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific developments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.",
keywords = "Sustainability Governance, Acceptance, Cognitive polyphasia, Nearshore wind, Offshore wind, Public objection, Social representations, Environmental Governance",
author = "Paul Upham and Katinka Johansen",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cognitive mess

T2 - Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Johansen, Katinka

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific developments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.

AB - The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific developments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.

KW - Sustainability Governance

KW - Acceptance

KW - Cognitive polyphasia

KW - Nearshore wind

KW - Offshore wind

KW - Public objection

KW - Social representations

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084203654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084203654

VL - 66

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

M1 - 101489

ER -

DOI